Description / introduction
Total marks: 8
|
Writing is clear, concise, and well organized with excellent writing Skills.
The introduction is engaging, states the main topic and
Previews the report structure. 8 marks
|
Writing is mostly clear, concise, and well organized with good writing
Skills.
Thoughts are expressed in a coherent and logical manner.
6 marks
|
Writing is unclear and/or disorganized.
The introduction states the main topic but does not adequately preview the structure of report
4 marks
|
Writing is unclear and disorganized.
There are numerous spelling, grammar, or syntax errors throughout the response.
2 marks
|
Background Total marks: 20
|
Author's writing demonstrates good understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources. (5 marks)
Viewpoints and interpretations are insightful and well supported. Clear, detailed examples are provided, as applicable. (5 marks)
Cited all data obtained from other sources. (5 marks)
All cited works, both text and visual, are done in the correct format with no errors (5 marks)
20 marks
|
Author's writing demonstrates some understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources. (4 marks)
Viewpoints and interpretations are supported. Appropriate examples are provided, as applicable. (4 marks)
Cited some data obtained from other sources. (4 marks)
All cited works, both text and visual, are done in the correct format with no errors. (4 marks)
16 marks
|
Author's writing demonstrates some understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources. (2.5 marks)
Viewpoints and interpretations are unsupported or supported with flawed arguments. (2.5 marks)
Cited very few data obtained from other sources. (2.5 marks)
All cited works, both text and visual, are done in the correct format with few errors. (2.5 marks)
10 marks
|
Writing does not demonstrate understanding any relationships among material obtained from all sources. (1.5 mark)
Viewpoints and interpretations are missing, inappropriate, and/or unsupported. (1.5 mark)
All cited works, both text and visual, are wrong. (1 mark)
4 marks
|