Students are required to resolve two case problem type questions from a list of case problem questions provided from the prescribed textbook using IRAC method, based on topics discussed in lectures....

Legal case study
Contents
Case:    2
Issue:    2
Rule:    2
Application:    2
Conclusion:    2
Q&A:    2
References    4
Case:
In a major, national supermarket chain, Jean was a regular shopper in the “East End Four Corners Supermarket”. He was there at least once a week and sometimes if the sales were really good. When Jean was there this week, she slipped on some grapes in aisle 3 and ruptured her ankle. In the shop's fruit department, grapes are usually found, and the shop was unsure how long the grapes were there or how long they were. The store manager said that there were a variety of spills every week in this store.
Issue: “East End Four Corners Supermarket owes a duty of care to Jean”?
Rule: Usually, negligence is described as failure to apply the level of care a reasonable, responsible individual would have exercised under the circumstances. This is called contributory negligence and shows the root of the "fault" that underlines it field of tort law. The first question to be discussed in Jean's case is whether Jean's tragedy was a case of negligence on the part of “East End Four Corners Supermarket”. Jean, being a frequent shopper, who visited the store at least once a week, was aware of the store's general outlay. In tort law, tort is a mistake mostly used in civil law, and negligence ranks among such the most common. We are seeking to establish that there was a duty of care, the duty was violated and harm was caused. The key features making case for duty are Reasonable foreseeing capacity. Anticipate ability in tort is in its binding human will by choosing the consequences of actions, and then we have to wonder why tort law considers capacity in terms of what an agent can fairly anticipate, rather than what the person actually predicts.
Application: The...