1. Executive summary (2.5 marks) |
Does not identify/provides only a limited identification of the requirements for the executive summary. |
Provides an outline of the report structure, but significance and relevance of issues in not discussed. No/little justification provided. |
Provides the basic summary of the report and identifies the key issues and how they inter-relate, but limited justification of significance. The structure of the report explained.
|
Provides a comprehensive summary of the report and a clear, succinct identification of the main points, but requires further justification of significance. The structure of the report clearly explained. |
A comprehensive summary that highlights the purpose and significance of the main points, which are clearly explained, justified and supported. The structure of the report is well signposted. |
2. Identification, understanding, use andapplication of theory (5 marks) |
Relevant theory on the topic missing and/or none/ poor attempt to use theory to support point of view and/or argument. |
Provides little analysis and evaluation of relevant theory, and limited linking of theory and concepts to practice. But makes attempts to use theory to support point of view and/or argument. |
Some analysis and critical evaluation of relevant theory developed through linking theory and concepts to practice. Theory linked to point of view and/or argument. |
Provides analysis and critical evaluation of relevant theory, with evidence of insight developed through linking theory and concepts to practice. Theory is integrated and linked well to argument. |
Provides a comprehensive analysis and critical evaluation of relevant theory, with evidence of insight developed through linking theory and concepts to practice. Theory is integrated exceptionally well into argument. |
3.Critical analysis and reflection and discussion (7.5 marks) |
Does not demonstrate any attempt at critical/reflective analysis. |
Little evidence of independent, critical thought in problem identification and solving. Superficial attempt at critical/reflective analysis. |
Attempted development of critical thought in problem identification and solving, but ideas/comments not supported. Demonstrates and integrates limited critical/reflective analysis. Evidence of some reflective thinking. |
Evidence of independent, critical thought in problem identification and solving. Demonstrates and integrates some critical/reflective analysis. Evidence of reflective thinking skills. |
Strong evidence of independent, critical thought in problem identification and solving. Consistently demonstrates and integrates critical/reflective evaluation of issues identified in strategic analysis. Evidence of reasoned reflective thinking skills. |
4 Conclusion (2.5 marks)
|
Conclusion not evident and/or does not relate to main arguments in report. |
Provides a summary of main arguments in the report, and arrives at logical conclusions, but no support given. |
Clear conclusion that reflects main arguments in report. Limited support and reasoning for conclusions provided. |
Well-constructed and clear conclusion supported by main arguments in report. Reasoned and logical conclusions reached. |
Well-constructed and clear conclusion with strong links to main arguments in report. Well-reasoned and logical conclusions drawn. |
5. Referencing and Presentation (2.5 marks) |
Unsatisfactory expression and presentation. Meaning unclear and/or grammar and/or spelling contain frequent errors. Poor presentation (referencing does not follow APA style) and less than5 journal articles utilised. |
Expression and presentation of ideas are comprehensible but lack clarity. Poor referencing style (referencing uses APA style, but with errors). Demonstrates limited reading outside of topic materials provided and practical application; does not utilise the required5 journal articles. |
Expression is lucid and clear with precise use of language. Writing style appropriate to the assessment item. Few flaws in grammar and spelling. Referencing follows correct APA style, but requires improvement. Demonstrates reading of topic materials provided and practical application; the required5 journal articles utilised. |
Expression and presentation of ideas is mainly accurate. Fluent writing style appropriate to the assessment item. Grammar and spelling are accurate. Referencing follows correct APA style, but some small errors. Demonstrates reading outside of topic materials provided and practical application; the required5 journal articles utilised. |
Expression and presentation of ideas are developed and clear. Fluent writing style appropriate to the assessment item. Grammar and spelling are accurate. Referencing follows correct APA style. Demonstrates wide reading and practical application; going beyond the required 5 journal articles.
|