I will attach the reources
SRM301_Assessment 1 Case Study - Supplied Context_ 15122020 Page 1 of 5 Context As consumers become more aware of the impact of their actions on the planet, sustainability is becoming a significant factor in the management of tourism destinations. Many destinations around the world are currently experiencing tourism-related issues that are or have the potential to cause irreparable damage. As a result, destinations are focusing on adopting initiatives & strategies that support sustainable social, economic and environmental development. The United Nations World Tourism Organisation (UNWTO) is ‘responsible for the promotion of responsible, sustainable and universally accessible tourism’ and ‘assists destinations in their sustainable positioning in ever more complex and international markets’ (UNWTO, n.d.). This assessment will allow students to consider sustainability issues in global destinations and consider the role of the UNWTO in supporting sustainable development. ASSESSMENT 1 – Case Study Subject Code and Title SRM301 Sustainability and Resource Management Assessment Case Study - Supplied Context Individual/Group Individual Length 1000 words (+/- 10%) Learning Outcomes a) Identify the nature and context of environmental, social and economic trends that impact the management of tourism. b) Appraise the environmental, social and financial factors required to develop business resilience and sustainability in the tourism industry. c) Apply theories and concepts as they relate to sustainable development. Submission Due by 11:55pm AEST Sunday end of Module 2 (Week 4) Weighting 25% Total Marks 100 marks SRM301_Assessment 1 Case Study - Supplied Context_ 15122020 Page 2 of 5 Instructions Please select one (1) of the case studies from the following list. Please be aware that you will be using the destination within your chosen case study for subsequent assessments. You will also need to review the UNWTO Sustainable Tourism for Development Guidebook (https://www.e- unwto.org/doi/epdf/10.18111/9789284415496) as you are required to apply this to your case study analysis: • Venice: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-03-12/venice-is-it-being-killed-by-mass- tourism/10887226 • Mount Everest: https://metro.co.uk/2018/08/08/shocking-true-impact-tourism-mount- everest-7815396/ • Queenstown: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/mar/08/queenstown-considers- tourist-levy-after-claim-crowds-threaten-wellbeing • Santorini: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/aug/28/santorini-popularity-soars- but-locals-say-it-has-hit-saturation-point • Amsterdam: https://www.dw.com/en/how-amsterdam-is-fighting-mass-tourism/a- 47806959 Once you have selected your case study you are required to submit a report in which you address the following: • Provide a brief overview of the chosen case study & destination. • Discuss environmental, social and economic conditions that have contributed to the tourism- related issues currently being experienced in the destination. • Apply the UNWTO Sustainable Tourism for Development framework to propose actions that could be implemented in the destination to support future sustainability in the tourism industry. Referencing You should make significant references to the subject material and substantial wider reading. A minimum of three (3) academic (scholarly books and peer-reviewed journal articles) and three (3) other sources (newspaper articles, trade publications, websites, etc.) must be used. These should be referenced in the APA style, both in-text and in a reference list. References to ‘Wikipedia’ or similar unsubstantiated sources will not be accepted. You must recognise all sources of information; including images that you include in your work. Reference your work according to the APA 6th edition guidelines. Please see more information on referencing here http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing https://www.e-unwto.org/doi/epdf/10.18111/9789284415496 https://www.e-unwto.org/doi/epdf/10.18111/9789284415496 https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-03-12/venice-is-it-being-killed-by-mass-tourism/10887226 https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-03-12/venice-is-it-being-killed-by-mass-tourism/10887226 https://metro.co.uk/2018/08/08/shocking-true-impact-tourism-mount-everest-7815396/ https://metro.co.uk/2018/08/08/shocking-true-impact-tourism-mount-everest-7815396/ https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/mar/08/queenstown-considers-tourist-levy-after-claim-crowds-threaten-wellbeing https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/mar/08/queenstown-considers-tourist-levy-after-claim-crowds-threaten-wellbeing https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/aug/28/santorini-popularity-soars-but-locals-say-it-has-hit-saturation-point https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/aug/28/santorini-popularity-soars-but-locals-say-it-has-hit-saturation-point https://www.dw.com/en/how-amsterdam-is-fighting-mass-tourism/a-47806959 https://www.dw.com/en/how-amsterdam-is-fighting-mass-tourism/a-47806959 http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing SRM301_Assessment 1 Case Study - Supplied Context_ 15122020 Page 3 of 5 Submission Instructions Submit Assessment 1 Case Study - Supplied Context via the submission link in the Assessment section found in the main navigation menu in SRM301 Sustainable and Resource Management on the learning portal. A rubric will be attached to the assessment. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the learning portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades. Extensions cannot be granted by the lecturer after the submission date. In the event of serious illness or unusual circumstances, a student may apply for Special Consideration in accordance with the rules and regulations governing this application, but it is important that such requests be made as soon as the circumstance is known. SRM301_Assessment 1 Case Study - Supplied Context_ 15122020 Page 4 of 5 Assessment Rubric Assessment Attributes Fail (Below minimum standard) 0-49% Pass (Functional) 50-64% Credit (Proficient) 65-74% Distinction (Advanced) 75-84% High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100% Overview of case study & destination 15% No overview of case study and/or destination provided. Limited overview of case study and destination provided. Clear overview of case study and destination provided. Detailed overview of case study and destination provided. Highly detailed overview of case study and destination provided. Environmental, social and economic conditions contributing to current destination issues 25% No environmental, social and economic conditions discussed that have contributed to the destination’s issues and/or discussion irrelevant. Limited discussion of environmental, social and economic conditions that have contributed to the destination’s issues, however not clearly explained. Brief discussion of relevant environmental, social and economic conditions that have contributed to the destination’s issues, however additional detail required. Clear discussion of relevant environmental, social and economic conditions that have contributed to the destination’s current issues being experienced. Clear and in-depth discussion of relevant environmental, social and economic conditions that have contributed to the destination’s current issues being experienced. Application of the UNWTO framework with actions to support destination’s future sustainability. 30% No application of UNWTO framework and/or no actions proposed for implementation and/or discussion irrelevant. No explanation as to how proposed actions could support destination’s future sustainability in the tourism industry and/or discussion irrelevant. Potential actions identified for implementation with limited application of UNWTO framework, however minimal explanation as to how identified actions could support destination’s future sustainability in the tourism industry. Relevant actions proposed for implementation with logical application of the UNWTO framework. Brief discussion as to how proposed actions could support destination’s future sustainability in the tourism industry, however additional detail required. Relevant actions clearly proposed for implementation with clear and logical application of the UNWTO framework throughout. The proposed actions clearly present effective support for the destination’s future sustainability in the tourism industry. Relevant actions proposed clearly and in—depth for implementation with logical application of the UNWTO framework explained in detail. The proposed actions are explored in detail and present highly effective methods to support the destination’s future sustainability in the tourism industry. SRM301_Assessment 1 Case Study - Supplied Context_ 15122020 Page 5 of 5 Structure 10% Discussion points do not flow smoothly or logically, no connection between ideas. Paragraphs not used or lacked structure. Minimal structure evident however applicable points loosely connected. Limited use of paragraphs. Good structure evident with some applicable points presented in a logical order. Paragraph structure used throughout. Good structure evident with most applicable points presented in a clear and logical order. All paragraphs are well organised. Excellent structure evident with all applicable points presented in a clear and logical order. Paragraphs well defined and organised to a high quality. Research & referencing 10% No evidence of research. No academic sources used. Sources of information not referenced using the APA style. Limited evidence of research. Minimal academic sources used. Many errors in APA referencing style. Some evidence of research. Limited academic sources used. Few errors in APA referencing style. Clear evidence of research. Several quality academic sources used. One or two errors in APA referencing style. Evidence of in-depth research. Many high- quality academic sources used. No errors in APA referencing style. Format & presentation 10% Many spelling mistakes and/or grammatical errors. Irrelevant diagrams/images/ multimedia used. Several spelling mistakes and/or grammatical errors. Use of relevant diagrams/images/multimedia (if required) minimal linkage to discussion. A few spelling mistakes and/or grammatical errors. Use of relevant diagrams/images/ multimedia (if required) basic linkage to discussion. Minimal spelling mistakes and/or grammatical errors. Good use of relevant diagrams/images/ multimedia (if required) clear linkage to discussion. No spelling mistakes or grammatical errors. Excellent use of high- quality diagrams/images/ multimedia (if required) strong linkage to discussion.