Someone suggested two types of potential knowledge developers: “Send me a well-developed computer programmer or a programmer competent in several languages, and we’ll make him or her into a successful...

Someone suggested two types of potential knowledge developers: “Send me a well-developed computer programmer or a programmer competent in several languages, and we’ll make him or her into a successful knowledge developer.” and “Send me a talented generalist with well-developed interpersonal skills—or somewhat more delicately,‘user friendly person’ —and a rigorously analytical mind, and we’ll team him or her with a competent knowledge developer.” In your opinion, which approach would be more successful in knowledge development? Why?