so therre is two parts
the first one major project
in the infographic i need \analysis of two different rhetorical appeals used by graham hill in the ted talk for example pathos ethos and logos
then your opinion evaluation , was he persuasive , did he get his point across and how he approached it using the rhetorical appeals ( ethos ,legos , pathos ) and what statistics were used if any were used
for the second part the design plan all you need to do is fill out the right side the chart
CORE 100: Design Plan for Major Project Rationale A Design Plan is a document like an outline for an essay that allows you to explore your vision for an assignment you’re working on. However, unlike a simple outline for an essay, a design plan asks you to think about more than just the content of whatever you’re working on. It asks you to think about your purpose, audience, chosen genre, resources and academic integrity. It therefore allows you to be more mindful in your choices in writing and to communicate those choices clearly to your reader. Design Plan Template The template below includes the sections required for your Major Project assignment. This version includes an explanation of each question in the second column. Steps 1. Explore the genre extensions available to you for your Major Assignment. You are asked to choose from an academic essay, a podcast, or an infographic. Reading, looking at, or listening to examples of these genres can also help you to gain a better understanding of how each of these genres works to convey information. 2. Decide which of these genres you want to create out of the raw material in your summary report. You will need to create an essay, podcast, or infographic using the ideas you generated in your summary report. Think about your existing skills and your curiosity, as well as what types of writing you think you may need in your future at Humber, in your workplace, or in your community. You may have interest in more than one of these genres, but it’s best to choose early and stick with it so you can focus your efforts. 3. Answer the questions below. Some of the questions will need only one complete sentence. Some will require short paragraphs. Use your judgement but be sure to fully answer the questions. Make a copy of the table below and submit together with your assignment. Question Explanation 1. What is my purpose? 1. Include a statement of purpose to guide you as you complete your document. A statement of purpose includes: i) a choice of verb (to inform, to persuade, to prove, to contest, to describe, etc.), ii) a named audience, and iii) a brief description of strategy. Ex: I will inform [active verb] people looking for information about the media’s role in gun violence [specific audience] by summarizing [strategy #1] Dr. Jennifer Johnston’s public lecture called “Mass Shootings and Media Contagion”, using images and layout in an infographic [strategy #2] that includes paraphrased material from the lecture [strategy #3]. 2. What genre do I want to use to present my work? Choose from this list: essay, podcast, or infographic 3. What are the conventions of that genre? Study the resources on our Blackboard site related to your chosen genre. What does it typically look like? How is it typically organized? What kind of language does it usually use (think about the register or how formal the language is, as well as the tone, whether it uses humour, passion, sarcasm, anger, or a neutral tone). What else is distinctive or special to this kind of document? 4. Who is my audience? Think about where people typically encounter this type of document, and be as specific as you can about who might read/view/listen to yours if you made it public. Consider your audience’s profession, education level, interests, as well as any specific demographic details (like age, ethnicity, gender, class, etc.) that may be relevant. 5. How will I meet my audience’s expectations? Name specific ideas for how you will follow the general rules you outlined in question 3, or state which of these rules you will not follow and why. 6. What resources do I need? Think about what software you might need, how much time you think it will take, what lessons you might need to refer to from the Blackboard site, what outside websites or examples of the genre you might want to consult for help, and any other sources (like making an appointment with the writing centre or your instructor) you want to take advantage of. 7. What does academic integrity look like in this context? How do authors acknowledge their sources in this genre? Is there a formal References page in APA format? Do they use footnotes? Do they make it clear where information is coming from in the opening sentence or in small text at the bottom of the page? CORE 100: Major Project Due: December 2, midnight. Value: 20% Points: 30 Submission Instructions: upload via Blackboard Assignment Objective This assignment will allow you to build on your active reading, paraphrasing, summarizing, and critical thinking skills. In addition, you’ll identify/analyze rhetorical appeals and evaluate the author’s use of those appeals in a critical response. Task: Produce a summary and analysis/evaluation of this TED Talk “Less stuff, more happiness” by Graham Hill. Don’t forget that there’s a transcript right on the webpage to use. You can submit your work in EITHER form of the following genres. You choose the one you’d like to explore and produce. • A podcast +20% bonus if you decide to go with this genre. • An infographic +20% bonus if you decide to go with this genre. • A traditional summary-analysis essay. No matter what genre you decide to choose, your work should consist of the following elements: • A full summary of the assigned article. • Analysis of two different rhetorical appeals used by Graham Hill. For example, pathos and ethos or logos and pathos. • Your opinion (evaluation) about the overall strength of the author’s argument. • Proper citation to give credit to the author. • All original ideas from the article should be paraphrased. • If you decide to go with the essay, you don’t need a title page and a references page. Helpful Tips: Part 1. Before you start working on your assignment, download a Design Plan and complete it. It’ll help you choose the format of your Major Project. You must submit the design plan together with your assignment. Part 2. Use these questions to help you identify the rhetorical appeals and their kinds. 1. Check for logos or logical appeals. Here, you’re asking yourself how the author is trying to convince you by appealing to your intellect, your sense of reason. Ask yourself the following questions: • Did the author use any facts or statistics to support their claims? https://www.ted.com/talks/graham_hill_less_stuff_more_happiness/ https://www.ted.com/talks/graham_hill_less_stuff_more_happiness/ • Did the author use any causal reasoning to support their claim? For example, did they argue we should or should not do something because of its effects? • Did the author argue by analogy? Did they draw comparisons or contrasts to make their points? • Did the author include any counter argument or rebuttal? Did they consider any arguments or points on the opposite side of the argument and show why those points aren’t strong? 2. Check for pathos or emotional appeals. Here, you’re asking yourself how the author is trying to convince you by appealing to your emotions, for example, your sense of fairness, anger, sadness, pride or fear. Ask yourself the following questions: • Did the author use any loaded language to make the audience feel a specific emotion? • Did the author use any anecdotes, tell any stories, either real stories or hypothetical ones, to make the audience feel, for example, sympathy or anger or fear? 3. Check for ethos or ethical appeals. Here, you’re asking yourself how the author is trying to convince you by appealing to your sense of trust, by appearing to be a credible source. Ask yourself the following questions: • Did the author establish themselves as an expert on the topic? • Did the author borrow someone else’s credentials by referring to them as a source? • Did the author establish common ground with the audience? • Did the author disclose their motives, maybe by admitting potential bias? • Did the author present their argument professionally? Part 3. Use these questions to help you evaluate the rhetorical appeals and their kinds. A. Is there enough support for the author’s point of view? Did they leave out important information? Were there aspects or topics of the argument that you wanted more information on before you could agree with the author? B. Is there rebuttal or counterargument? Did the author acknowledge any arguments that would support the opposing viewpoint? If so, did they represent those arguments fairly? Did they clearly show why those arguments are not as strong as the author’s own point of view? Be sure to support your answers by explaining what was done well or poorly. C. Did the author make any mistakes when trying to make their arguments? Were the comparisons accurate and fair? Were the cause/effect relationships well explained and supported? Be sure to quote or paraphrase to show where you see the problem and then explain why this is an error in thinking. D. Did the author use any loaded language that is designed to elicit a particular emotion in the audience? Did they use any examples or anecdotes to elicit an emotion? In either case, was this an appropriate use of emotional language or examples, or did the author try to cover up a bad argument or insufficient evidence with a wave of emotion? Explain your answer. E. Were the sources the author used as support credible sources? Did the author quote or refer to any known experts? Did the author refer to any organizations or government agencies? Are all of these references appropriate sources for an article on this topic? (You can do some research to make your argument here, but be sure to cite it appropriately in APA format if you do.) F. Did the author’s tone and language, as well as the way they presented their argument make them seem credible and authoritative or did these detract from their credibility? Explain your answer with specific details. Rubric: Design plan: Design plan is complete and submitted together with the major project. (5) Summary part: Summary mentions the author, text title, year, source, and purpose. Summary is a short form of the original. Summary mentions the thesis and all main ideas of the text that support the thesis. Information is free from personal opinion and nothing extra is added. (10) Analysis and Evaluation part: Two different rhetorical appeals and their kinds are identified correctly. Examples of these appeals are present. Student opinion about the overall strength of the author’s argument is present. (10) Academic integrity: Critical response gives credit to the author when and where needed. APA formatting is used correctly if needed. (2) Language: Language is audience-appropriate. Information is mainly paraphrased. Language is mainly free from errors or they don't interfere with understanding. (3)