Since you just finished the Capsim simulation, compiled your results, and are now looking to the future of your company, the first component of your capstone requires you to compose a company...

1 answer below »

Since you just finished the Capsim simulation, compiled your results, and are now looking to the future of your company, the first component of your capstone requires you to compose a company performance summary. Imagine that this summary is for new members of the board of directors of your company. It is imperative that the board understand your company, its value, and its development cycle over the last eight years. This is your opportunity to exhibit your knowledge of your organization, your products, and how your business functions.


High-level business executives are often short on time, so it is important that your summary is concisely written and rich in content. As has been emphasized in previous classes in the business core, effective business communication, peer-to-peer and peer-to-leader collaboration, and professional etiquette are mandatory skills to have when entering today’s business world. Because this is the last course in the business core, the second component of your capstone


requires you to reflect on your use of business communication skills, professional etiquette, and collaboration skills throughout the Capsim simulation, this course, and the previous courses you have taken in the business core.



Capstone Component 1: Executive Summary


For the first of two capstone components, you will develop a comprehensive, professional executive summary by analyzing quantitative and qualitative tools, analyzing strategic problem-solving skills, assessing any ethical, legal, or social challenges that may be encountered, analyzing global markets, and analyzing entrepreneurial approaches. This executive summary will be used to inform new members of the board of directors who must become familiar with your company.


The following sections should be included:


I.
Progress of the Company.You should briefly bring the new board members up to speed about the progress of your company over the past eight years. While it is not important to describe every change, be sure to give an executive-level overview of the various products, strategies, and performances.


II.
Current Situation. Here, discuss the current situation of your company by performing and analyzing a full SWOT analysis.


a) Strengths: Identify the strengths of the organization.


b) Weaknesses: Identify the weaknesses of the organization.


c) Opportunities: Identify potential opportunities the organization should explore in order to expand.


d) Threats: Identify external factors that could negatively affect the organization.


III.
Future of the Company.Consider the results of your SWOT analysis, and detail an approach you plan to take regarding your top priority at the company. Be sure to include any innovative or sustainable approaches in your plan.


IV.
Ethical, Legal, and Social Challenges.Discuss any ethical, legal, or social challenges the company may have faced or could face in the future, and suggest strategies for how the company could overcome these challenges.


V.
Global Considerations.In this section, discuss what necessary factors would need to be considered if the company were to expand into the global market. Consider the opportunities and threats outlined in the SWOT analysis previously in order to analyze the greatest advantages and disadvantages to expanding this company into the global market.



Capstone Component 2: Professional Reflection


For the second and final component of your capstone, you will compose a reflection in which you discuss the process and outcomes of this project, as well as how your coursework culminated in the capstone project. This may include discussions of unforeseen problems or obstacles, and any unexpected surprises. The reflection should also discuss your identified strengths and problems that you encountered while completing the capstone. Finally, the reflection will examine how the capstone project will be useful in the job market or in furthering your education.


You should envision this component as a personal reflection on the capstone and your experience in the business core program as a whole. For instance, relative to the capstone, you could discuss what you did (or intended to do), and then consider what worked well, what challenges you faced, and what you would change or do differently to make your experience better. In reflecting on your time in the business core program, you might discuss where you started, where you are, and where you see yourself going.


Note that this component is not about evaluating the capstone itself but rather your experience within the capstone project.


Some of the issues that you could address in this final component of this capstone include the following:


· Overall, what was your capstone experience like?


· Reflect on your experience performing the Capsim simulation.


· Reflect on the significance of the capstone in relation to your own experience.


· What connections do you see between your capstone and your academic program?


· How will you apply what you have learned to your future academic and/or professional life?


· How did you demonstrate effective business communication in both this capstone course and throughout the business core program?


· How will you utilize these business communication skills in your future classes here at SNHU and in the working world after graduation?


Reflect on your experiences with peer-to-peer and peer-to-leader collaboration in this capstone course.


How has peer-to-peer and peer-to-leader collaboration influenced your performance and decision making in this class?


Reflect on establishing and maintaining professional business etiquette in both this capstone course and throughout the business program.



Final Project Rubric


This rubric will be applied to both components as a whole, and no component will be assessed on its own.


The “Possible Indicators of Success” are examples for you and the instructor of the types of concepts to look for to demonstrate proficiency. They are neither exhaustive nor proscriptive and should be used as guides for illustrating how your capstone embodies the outcome. All outcomes are weighted equally.



Guidelines for Submission:The submitted executive summary should be comprehensive and adhere to best practices for business writing. Be sure that your writing is concise and appropriate for your target audience. Any quoted, paraphrased, or borrowed information should be cited according to the guidelines in the
Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association(APA).


Answered Same DayDec 25, 2021

Answer To: Since you just finished the Capsim simulation, compiled your results, and are now looking to the...

David answered on Dec 25 2021
131 Votes
2018 – 2025 ANNUAL REPORT – THE ANDREW’S COMPANY | 1
Southern New Hampshire
University
Final Project
Grazina R. Jagucianskaite
2017
2018 - 2025 Annual Report
2018 – 2025 ANNUAL REPORT – THE ANDREW’S COMPANY | 2

Executive Summary
This executive summary is basically for the new members of the board of directors of the
Andrew’s Company. The summary is based upon the results compiled so far and is directed
towards the future of the company. The core objective is to make the board of the company well
understand the overall organizations, its values, and its overall development cycle in the last
couple of years. This is being regarded as an opportunity to exhibit the knowledge of the
organization, the products as well as the way business functions. This executive summary is
highly concise but rich in content and has been written in way taking into con
sideration the short
time of the high-level business executives.
Furthermore, this executive summary is based upon analyzing the quantitative and
qualitative tools, analyzing strategic problem-solving skills, assessing any ethical, legal, or social
challenges that may be encountered, analyzing global markets, and analyzing entrepreneurial
approaches.
2018 – 2025 ANNUAL REPORT – THE ANDREW’S COMPANY | 3

Contents
Mission Statement ........................................................................................................................... 4
Original Strategy ............................................................................................................................. 4
First Year – Ending December 31, 2018 ..................................................................................... 5
Second Year – Ending December 31, 2019 ................................................................................ 6
Third Year – Ending December 31, 2020 ................................................................................... 6
Fourth Year – Ending December 31, 2021 ................................................................................. 7
Fifth Year – Ending December 31, 2022 .................................................................................... 7
Sixth, Seventh and Eight Year – Ending December 31, 2023, 2024, 2025 ................................ 8
Conclusion ...................................................................................................................................... 9
Appendix ....................................................................................................................................... 10
2018 – 2025 ANNUAL REPORT – THE ANDREW’S COMPANY | 4

Mission Statement
The Mission of the Andrew’s Company is to basically provide and offer high quality
product to the industry for distribution worldwide. The product will be produced in a variety of
the Andrew’s Company in both the high and low tech markets using established market specific
Research & Development (R&D) techniques and price; and thereby, placing them in highly
competitive markets. Also, Andrew’s Software is committed to producing products that have
excellent design and quality attributes.
Original Strategy
At the outset of incorporation, the Andrew’s Company management decided that it would
concentrate on a strategy of being a “Cost Leader” with laying a strong focus on the “Product
Lifecycle”. As part of this strategy, chief focus will be laid upon keeping the R&D, production
and material costs as low as possible and then, make efforts to compete with other companies in
the related industry. Efforts will also be made to introduce the desired product into the High
Tech market after couple years in order to allow the product to move through the perceptual map
into Low Tech market and then, eventually become obsolete. Moreover, performance will be
measured in term of Stock Price, ROE and ROS.
The product is going to be used in a wide variety of industry and application as well as in
constant need of modifications to meet customers’ demand as usually customers like to purchase
cheaper products with a higher performance. Along with the Andrew’s Company, there were five
other identical organizations as well. Each of the six companies produced software which were
sold in both the High and Low tech markets. With the passage of time, these companies began to
2018 – 2025 ANNUAL REPORT – THE ANDREW’S COMPANY | 5

differentiate their software in the areas of price, age, reliability and positioning in size, and even,
performance.
Additionally, customers within the Low Tech market had specific buying criteria that
they were interested in for the software they purchased. They mainly focused on price, age,
reliability and positioning (in order of their liking and preference). Moreover, in the High Tech
market, specific buying criteria is more focused on positioning with age, price and reliability (in
order of their liking, importance and preference).
The Andrew’s Company competed against these five companies over a long period of
eight years, and during all this time, the Low Tech market created much more demand for
product as compared to the High Tech market. Also, Low Tech market started out demanding
68.1% leaving High Tech with just 31.9% of the market share. After the completion of the long
seven year period, customers in the Low Tech market still demanded a much greater portion of
the production; as they had just about 53.8% of the market leaving High Tech with 44.1%. Based
upon this reduction in market share for the Low Tech and increase for the High Tech market,
they each had different growth rates. Low Tech’s growth rate was 10% whereas the growth rate
of High Tech was about 20%.
First Year – Ending December 31, 2018
I was hired as a CEO, to run the business, and make the strategic decisions. As a CEO, I
decided, to go with one product and with a Low Tech Segment. I chose Low Tech Segment in
the beginning to introduce Andrew’s Company to the competitive market.
In this round in a Low Tec Able had 17% of Market Share, 926 Units were sold, Pfmn
Coord. was 6.4, Size 13.6, Price - $34.00, MTBF 21000. We spend $1,000 on Promo, Customer
2018 – 2025 ANNUAL REPORT – THE ANDREW’S COMPANY | 6

Average 58%, sales budget was $ 1,000, and Age on Dec. 31 was 4.10. Customer accessibility
had 35%, customer survey – 15.
In this round in a High Tec Able had 14% of Market Share, 367 Units were sold, Pfmn
Coord. was 6.4, Size 13.6, Price - $34.00, MTBF 21000. We spend $1,000 on Promo, Customer
Average 58%, sales budget was $ 1,000, and Age on Dec. 31 was 4.10. Customer accessibility
had 35%, customer survey – 9.
Second Year – Ending December 31, 2019
Stock Price, ROE and ROS were moving forward, in the right direction. Andrews
Company was rated in the third place, but we have some troubles with our inventory, we had too
much on the hand. Looking at the sales they weren’t the best but compared with our competitors
we still stood on the leading positions. I have decided to stick with the same price of the product,
and let product get adapt the market fluctuations. My strategy was, that Able would be known
product, and it will be available to sell for all entire year. This year, the interest of our product
came from the Low Tech market, 13% and the High Tech market took 8%. I needed to figure out
a strategy to produce enough product, the same eliminate inventory on the hand, generate enough
sales in each market, because we lost critical sales to our competitors.
Third Year – Ending December 31, 2020
This year we had a little dip in every department. Our ROE, ROA and ROS were very
low, sales reached $30, 605,087. Andrew’s company has little cash on hand, we spend almost
$11,000 on a direct Labor, $12,000 on materials, and inventory carried $2,032. In hindsight that
this product MTBF was set too low. Accessibility and awareness with both Low and High Tech
markets were still good. The product is doing seem better in Low Tech market more than the
2018 – 2025 ANNUAL REPORT – THE ANDREW’S COMPANY | 7

High Tech, because in the third round, the Low Tech market took 64.2% and High Tech market
35.7%.
Fourth Year – Ending December 31, 2021
Did we ever understand power of decision? This year was the worst year for an Andrew’s
company. As a CEO, I made a big mistake, which actually led us in some profit drop. Our
companies ROA was negative -3.5%, ROE - -4.3%, EBIT – ($792,004), and Profits dropped to a
– ($819,003). We still managed have $8,510,150 Cumulative profits, and stay away from
emergency loans, which could led Andrew’s Company close to bankruptcy. Andrew’s
Company’s market share was the lowest against other...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here