Siebt:rt's essay ends with two acts of violence: a caretaker killed by an elephant in captivity, and a villager killed and buried by an elephant herd. Why does he structure the piece in thjs way?...

Siebt:rt's essay ends with two acts of violence: a caretaker killed by an elephant in captivity, and a villager killed and buried by an elephant herd. Why does he structure the piece in thjs way? S.ince he also began by desc1ibing violence, has Siebert come fi1II circle? Or has he put hjs readers in a better position to understand the viokncc?