Select a case study from the list below and address the following points. 1. Determine the stakeholders including two health care professionals in the case scenario; 2. Differentiate the ethical and...

Select a case study from the list below and address the following points.
1. Determine the stakeholders including two health care professionals in the case scenario; 2. Differentiate the ethical and legal conflicts and explain them from the following perspectives:  The dignity and rights of all stakeholders in this case  The principles and virtues of health care ethics that inform professional practice  The relevant codes of ethics and/or codes of professional conduct  3. Propose a legally and ethically defensible resolution to these conflicts
CASE STUDY ONE Kamil Samra is a sports physiotherapist and specialist in treating musculoskeletal injuries who is employed by an AFL club on the basis of his notable success.   Kamil enjoys friendly relations with the players and the club managers and has become a close friend of two of the players. One evening, at a bar, Kamil is made aware that the coach and sports scientists are supplying performance-enhancing drugs to the players. He later verifies this information for himself when he discovers a package containing the banned peptide Thymosin beta-4 at the club headquarters.  Kamil discusses this issue with both the coach and the club management who, in turn, offer him an even higher salary in exchange for his silence on this matter.  In accepting the offer Kamil can ensure care for his poor, aging parents in Lebanon.  However, he is aware that Thymosin beta-4 not only enhances athletic performance (and is in breach of the anti-doping rules in sport), but it may also cause long-term health issues, but the players, in being contractually bound to follow instructions by the coaching team, are not really free to refuse to use this banned peptide