review(15d): suppose a researcher collected data to compare whether dogs of different size differed in mean cost to a pet owner. Dogs were categorized as small, medium, or large. Costs were calculated...









review(15d):


suppose a researcher collected data to compare whether dogs of different size differed in mean cost


  to a pet owner. Dogs were categorized as small, medium, or large. Costs were calculated as the aver


age cost of the amount spend of food, veterinary visits and medication. The calculated F statistic


was 421.58. Given this statistic, which of the following is the most reasonable conclusion.


(a)The  F statistic shows that variation within groups is larger than variation between groups, therfore


the researcher will likely fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there ia not an association


between dog size and mean cost to the pet owner.


(b) The F statistic  shows that large dogs have a signifcantly higher cost to the pet owner than the


other catgories., therfore the researcher will reject the null hypotheses  and conclude that large


dogs have a higher cost to the pet owner.


(c) THe F statistic shows that variation between groups  is larger than varition within groups., therefore, the researcher will reject the null hypothesis  and conclude that there is an


association between dog size and mean cost to the pet owner such that at least at least two of


the size groups differ.


(d) none of the above






Jun 10, 2022
SOLUTION.PDF

Get Answer To This Question

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here