ENGG4500 Engineering Complexity – Assessment 3 Rubric XXXXXXXXXX ENGG4500 Engineering Complexity – Assessment 3 – Comparisons and Evaluations Assessment Criteria:Fail (0-49%) (failure to...

1 answer below »
Responses will be measured and ranked by how well they;
1. demonstrate connections between various aspects of complexity (beyond

definitions of terms)
2. demonstrate systems-level thinking / frameworks of knowledge
3. demonstrate the use of visual communications to support concepts.
4. demonstrate the creative development of the supplied shape.

• Note: Applicants are free to; utilise any part or all of this shape, use any

combinations or derivatives of this shape.


ENGG4500 Engineering Complexity – Assessment 3 Rubric 2021 1 ENGG4500 Engineering Complexity – Assessment 3 – Comparisons and Evaluations Assessment Criteria: Fail (0-49%) (failure to adequately address the main issues and lack of understanding of the basic principles) Pass (50-64%) (majority of the main issues addressed but inadequate evidence of independent thinking and analysis) Credit (65-74%) (all the main issues are addressed but limited evidence of independent thinking and analysis) Distinction (75-84%) (good exploration of main issues with high level of independent thinking and critical analysis) High Distinction (85-100%) (comprehensive exploration of main issues with outstanding level of independent thinking and critical analysis) Formatting, Clarity 10% Submission filename is not correct. For ‘document’ submission - is not in pdf format. Page count and / or word count exceeded by more than 20% For ‘video’ submission – link not included and / or inactive. Video duration is more than 4.00 minutes Submission filename is correct. For ‘document’ submission - is in pdf format. Document is more than 3 pages and/or with a word count in excess of 600 words For ‘video’ submission – link is included and active. Video duration is more than 4.00 minutes Submission filename is correct. For ‘document’ submission - is in pdf format. Document is 3 pages or less, with a word count of 600 words For ‘video’ submission – link is included and active. Video duration is less than 4.00 minutes Submission filename is correct. For ‘document’ submission - is in pdf format. Document is 3 pages or less, with a word count of 600 words For ‘video’ submission – link is included and active. Video duration is less than 4.00 minutes Submission filename is correct. For ‘document’ submission - is in pdf format. Document is 3 pages or less, with a word count of 600 words For ‘video’ submission – link is included and active. Video duration is less than 4.00 minutes Complexity - Content and Knowledge 45% Very low standard of addressing complexity factors from the course materials. Failure to address connections between aspects. Very low use of visual communication to support concepts. Low standard of addressing complexity factors from the course materials. Absence of proposing connections between aspects being included. Poor standard of utilising visual communication to support concepts. Reasonable levels of addressing complexity factors from the course materials. Good standard of proposing connections between aspects being included. Good standard of utilising visual communication to support concepts. High levels of addressing complexity factors from the course materials. Thorough articulation of connections between aspects being included. Excellent use of visual communication to support concepts. Exceptional approach to complexity factors from the course materials. Extensive and insightful connections between aspects being included. Excellent use of visual communication to support concepts. Creativity – Exploration and Communication 45% Poor quality of exploration for applying the supplied ‘shape’. Poor use of visual communication for directions and ease of reading. Doc. submissions – poor quality of diagramming with frequent ambiguous / vague content. Video submissions – poor quality of explanation / demonstration of concepts. Low quality of exploration for applying the supplied ‘shape’. Low to adequate use of visual communication for directions and ease of reading. Doc. submissions – difficult to read, poor quality of diagramming with regular ambiguous / vague content. Video submissions – adequate quality of explanation / demonstration of concepts. Good quality of exploration for applying the supplied ‘shape’. Visual Communication devices used appropriately for directions and ease of reading. Document submissions – easy to read, good quality of diagramming with occasional ambiguous / vague content. Video submissions – good quality of explanation / demonstration of concepts. High quality exploration of applying the supplied ‘shape’. Sophisticated and well considered use of visual communication methods. Doc. submissions – insightful proposals with excellent use of diagramming to support concepts. Video submissions – Excellent quality of explanation / demonstration of concepts. Outstanding exploration of applying the supplied ‘shape’. Sophisticated and well considered use of visual communication methods. Doc. submissions – insightful proposals, high levels of integration with diagramming of concepts. Video submissions – Outstanding quality of explanation / demonstration of concepts. PowerPoint Presentation Prepared by; Warren A. Reilly Assignment 3 Summary: AIM = to synthesise how aspects of complexity may relate to each other. Prepared by; Warren A. Reilly • … we are going to use a fictitious ‘Client’ as a way of formulating your thoughts about complexity. • Q: Why use a ‘fictitious’ Client for this Assessment..? • … echoes of professional practice • … it displaces our focus away from ourselves. • … it implies a structure/format to our thoughts Prepared by; Warren A. Reilly • Q:… remember the various diagrams we have been exploring…? • … Assessment 3 allows us to think about how these may relate to each other.. Prepared by; Warren A. Reilly • So lets introduce our ‘Client’…… TetraHedra Consulting • TetraHedra* is a National Engineering Company that specialises in innovative solutions to complex projects. • They are looking to open an office in the Hunter Valley • .. so they are recruiting to extend their current team of engineers and consultants. • .. this is a fantastic opportunity to join a company that have a proven record of making a positive change in the world. (*) - TetraHedra is a fictional company used for this assessment Prepared by; Warren A. Reilly • So lets introduce our ‘Client’…… TetraHedra Consulting • Typical for TetraHedra, they have taken an unusual approach to sorting the ‘best and brightest people’ for their new team • .. they have set a ‘simple’ challenge for all applicants to complete. • .. how applicants utilise this (seemingly simple) information, will determine if they are considered for a permanent position in the team. • For us, Assessment 3 will take the form of your response to this challenge. • (Note: for the sake of this assessment, assume that you REALLY want this job) Prepared by; Warren A. Reilly The TetraHedra Challenge: • Below is the developed shape for a solid. “How can you use this ‘starting point’ to demonstrate both; your knowledge of complexity + your creativity as an engineer..?” Prepared by; Warren A. Reilly The TetraHedra Challenge: “How can you use this ‘starting point’ to demonstrate both; your knowledge of complexity and your creativity as an engineer..?” • Responses will be measured and ranked by how well they; 1. demonstrate connections between various aspects of complexity (beyond definitions of terms) 2. demonstrate systems-level thinking / frameworks of knowledge 3. demonstrate the use of visual communications to support concepts. 4. demonstrate the creative development of the supplied shape. • Note: Applicants are free to; utilise any part or all of this shape, use any combinations or derivatives of this shape. Prepared by; Warren A. Reilly The TetraHedra Challenge: “How can you use this ‘starting point’ to demonstrate both; your knowledge of complexity and your creativity as an engineer..?” • Responses will be measured and ranked by how well they; • Responses must be in one of the two following formats (NOT both): 1. A Youtube video demonstrating your response – (maximum length 4 minutes) OR 2. A pdf document using text and diagrams – (maximum of 600 words over 3 pages) • (Note: text within diagrams are not part of the word count). • … a template file is available if you want to use it… Prepared by; Warren A. Reilly The TetraHedra Challenge: “How can you use this ‘starting point’ to demonstrate both; your knowledge of complexity and your creativity as an engineer..?” Prepared by; Warren A. Reilly Prepared by; Warren A. Reilly • Q: What do we need to do..? a. Determine which aspects of Complexity you understand are important. b. Decide how many of those aspects you will include. c. Articulate how these aspects may connect or relate to each other. d. Map/diagram how these connections could be communicated to someone else. e. Creatively utilise the supplied shape to communicate those connections. f. Decide on which format (video or document) to communicate your thoughts. Prepared by; Warren A. Reilly Assignment 3 Summary: “To synthesise how aspects of complexity may relate to each other.” • What = respond to the Clients challenge question. • How = electronic submission via CANVAS • Format = Youtube OR pdf document only…. • … there is a template file for written responses • .. please do not ‘zip’ the submissions • Submission name = [your name, student number]_Assess 3 • eg “Warren Reilly 1234567_Assess 3” • Alternatively for those needing privacy, “Warren” and last 4 numbers of your student number eg. “Warren4321_Assess 3” • When = due 11.59pm 23 October 2022 Prepared by; Warren A. Reilly Assignment 3 – checklist. Assessment 3 – checklist before submitting. Content Have I considered the two different aspects (knowledge/creativity)..? Have I clearly explained how to read my model in a way the Client can follow? Have I considered the connections between the aspects of complexity I have included? Have I avoided definitions of terms? Delivery Have I pushed myself to ‘use’ their shape in novel and appropriate ways? Have I kept within the time/word limits? Is the file named appropriately (student name, assessment etc)…? Is it in the correct format..? Time Have I submitted my files before 11.59pm 23/10/2022..? ENGG4500/6500 Engineering Complexity 2022 – Assessment 3 Template ENGG45/6500 Student
Answered 3 days AfterOct 18, 2022

Answer To: ENGG4500 Engineering Complexity – Assessment 3 Rubric XXXXXXXXXX ENGG4500 Engineering Complexity –...

Banasree answered on Oct 21 2022
56 Votes
ENGG4500/6500 Engineering Complexity 2022 – Assessment 3 Template
    ENGG45/6500 Student Name:
    
    Youtube video
link:
    
    Written/visual response
    Submission constraints
    Page limit = 3 pages
Word limit = 600 words of free text (text in diagrams are not counted)
    Your response:
    Use the space below to articulate;
* how the aspects of complexity you have selected relate to each other?
* how you could you diagram the connections between those aspects?
* how you could creatively use the clients base shape to communicate those connections..?
The space below this table is for any graphic content you may wish to add…
Tetrahedral is a pyramid with a triangular base and three sides. In this assignment we will study projected Tetrahedra of GPU based implementation. A Projected Tetrahedra algo involves with display visualization of the tetrahedra’s data space and converting it into a right rendering order. Primarily, the process will be the 3D data which must be in a tetrahedralated. Although for the regular volume, which can be possible by separating the independent lattice cell to 5 tetrahedra.
This project...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here