Requirements Report Value: 30% Due date: 04-Oct-2017 Return date: 27-Oct-2017 Submission method options Alternative submission method Task Further Background Refer to background information provided...

Requirements Report Value: 30% Due date: 04-Oct-2017 Return date: 27-Oct-2017 Submission method options Alternative submission method Task Further Background Refer to background information provided in Assessments 1 and 2 regarding the Headspace project. The project is considering cloud based solutions which should be investigated. Consider various aspects of cloud based solutions such as; data security, which includes data ownership (by Headspace, the young person, medical professionals, the Emergency Department etc). As well as other relevant aspects of cloud solutions. Complete the Following Please refer to the marking guide when preparing your response to see what criteria and standards will be used to assess your work and your progress. Non-Functional Requirements This sets out the critical system qualities, system interfaces, user interface requirements, and system constraints. Use to ‘FURPS+’ acronym as reference, and ensure you at cover the non-functional aspects of the acronym, Usability, Reliability, Performance and Security. In your answer, critically compare and contrast these non-functional requirements from the functional requirements for this system. Review of cloud based. A review of strengths and weaknesses of cloud based solutions. Taking into consideration the environment which the solution would be deployed. Given the sensitive nature of mental health data, discuss how the data will be kept secure, particularly if third party products are involved which may not be subject to Australian legislative protections regarding the storage of such data. SDLC Approach Write brief description of the Pros and Cons to approaching the project using the ‘Predictive’ SDLC, then the Pros and Cons to approach the project as ‘Adaptive’ SDLC. Then recommend either Predictive or Adaptive to the SDLC for the project and briefly describe why. Rationale This assessment aligns with learning outcomes o be able to describe the context of an information system; o be able to compare and contrast the different methodologies of systems analysis and evaluate their appropriateness for different and complex situations; o be able to distinguish between requirement gathering techniques and combine these appropriately to apply to a real scenario; o be able to evaluate development requirements and prepare a feasibility proposal based on multi-disciplinary (financial, human resource, technological) analyses; o be able to formulate and justify system requirement models based on evaluation of given situations; o be able to assemble the components of a requirements model using the tools and techniques of object oriented or structured systems modelling. Marking criteria CRITERIA STANDARDS High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail 1.Non-Functional Requirements Maximum 10 Marks Specifies the qualities/ non-behavioural requirements that can be used to judge the operation of the system. Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Evidence of having researched/read more widely beyond the core materials. Specifies the qualities/ non-behavioural requirements that can be used to judge the operation of the system. Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic. Evidence of having read beyond the core materials. Specifies the main qualities/ non-behavioural requirements that can be used to judge the operation of the system. Demonstrates thorough understanding of material presented in core texts and readings. Specifies some of the qualities/ non-behavioural requirements that can be used to judge the operation of the system. Demonstrates evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. However literature is presented uncritically in a purely descriptive manner. Content acknowledged but not really taken into account. Poorly specifies the qualities/ non-behavioural requirements that can be used to judge the operation of the system. Demonstrates very little evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Inaccurate or inconsistent acknowledgment of sources. Limited knowledge of key principles and concepts. 2.Review of cloud based solution Maximum 8 Marks Clearly identified strengths and weaknesses of cloud solutions. As well as apply indepth understanding of the environment that the solution would be used in. Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic. Evidence of having researched/read more widely beyond the core materials. Clearly identified strengths and weaknesses of cloud solutions Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic. Evidence of having read beyond the core materials. Strengths and weaknesses are identified. Demonstrates thorough understanding of material presented in core texts and readings. Strengths and weaknesses are identified. Demonstrates evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. However literature is presented uncritically in a purely descriptive manner. Content acknowledged but not really taken into account. Strengths and weaknesses are poorly expressed. Demonstrates very little evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Inaccurate or inconsistent acknowledgment of sources. Limited knowledge of key principles and concepts. 3. SDLC Approach Maximum 8 marks Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding in relation to SDLC approach. Has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Evidence of having researched/read more widely beyond the core materials. Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding in relation to SDLC approach. Has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic. Evidence of having read beyond the core materials. Demonstrates clear understanding in relation to SDLC approach. Demonstrates thorough understanding of material presented in core texts and readings. Discusses the SDLC approach. Demonstrates evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. However literature is presented uncritically in a purely descriptive manner. Content acknowledged but not really taken into account. Poor discussion of SDLC approach. Demonstrates very little evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Inaccurate or inconsistent acknowledgment of sources. Limited knowledge of key principles and concepts. 4.Presentation, writing style, grammer and references Maximum 4 Marks Highly developed skills in expression and presentation of response. Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task. Grammar and spelling accurate. Well organised. Well-developed skills in expression and presentation of response. Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task. Grammar and spelling accurate. Well organised. Good skills in expression and clear presentation of response. Mostly fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task. Grammar and spelling accurate. Some skills in expression and presentation of response. Meaning apparent but writing style not always fluent or well organised. Grammar and spelling contain errors. Rudimentary skills in expression and presentation of response. Not all material is relevant and/or is presented in a disorganised manner. Meaning apparent but writing style not fluent or well-organised, Grammar and spelling contain errors. Presentation Your answer should be approx. 7 pages, Times Roman size 12 (title page and references are not part of page count). You should use your own words and avoid lengthy quotations. Requirements If any references are required, ensure to use APA referencing to acknowledge the sources that you have used in preparing your assessment. Please refer to the CSU referencing guide http://student.csu.edu.au/study/referencing-at-csu. In addition a very useful tool for you to use that demonstrates how to correctly use in text referencing and the correct way to cite the reference in your reference list can be found at https://apps.csu.edu.au/reftool/apa-6