Required to do work based assignments on templates provided. Radical register can be used also.
BSB50820 Diploma of Project Management Assessment Workbook – Module 2 Customised for Sydney Water Infrastructure Projects About this Module Assessment This Module Assessment focusses on the following Units of Competency: · BSBPMG533 - Manage project cost · BSBPMG532 - Manage project quality · BSBPMG536 - Manage project risk Accompanying this Assessment Workbook is the “Elemental Learner Handbook” in your Student Resource Kit. It contains additional relevant information, guidance, and policies relating to this assessment. To submit each Module Assessment, follow the instructions in the document “User Manual for Learners – Student Portal” in your Student Resource Kit. Student details and declaration Student Name: Arthur Andronopoulos Date of submission: Click to select date Comments/Feedback: (anything you’d like your assessor to know?) DECLARATION: The documents and answers that I have attached and submitted are my own work, completed in person by me. I understand that I am not to give my completed assessment (or provide a copy of my assessment) to any person other than Elemental Projects personnel. I have read, understood, and agree to the declaration above: Choose an item. Overall Assessment Result [ASSESSOR USE ONLY] Module Assessment Matrix Satisfactory Not Satisfactory Resubmit – due: Click or tap to enter a date. Feedback Assessor Name: Date of assessment: Click or tap to enter a date. Module 2 Assessment – Summary Table To complete this Module Assessment, you must complete each of the assessment tasks outlined below. Task # Assessment type Assessment description 1 Case study project documentation Activities workshopped during training, based on the case study project provided. These may be completed during training or completed individually at home. They include: 1. Project Management Plan 2. Quality Plan 3. Quality Control Tools 4. Risk Register 5. Project Cost Estimate 6. Integrated Baseline 7. EVM Analysis 2 Work-based project documentation Professional project management documents developed for a work-based project using either the templates provided in the Elemental Toolkit or your own organisation’s equivalent project management templates: 1. Project Management Plan 2. Quality Plan 3. Risk Register 4. Project Cost Estimate / Project Budget 5. Status Report 6. Change Log 7. Project Review 8. Closure Report 3 Knowledge questions Knowledge questions, answered in your own words, taking into consideration the content covered during the training, additional independent research, and your own work experience. 4 Observable Task Record of your participation in the Mencken Madness simulation, signed by your trainer. Copyright © Elemental Projects (Australia Pty Ltd) – RTO# 45615 – Version 6.0 Jan 2022 Assessment Task 1 – Case Study Project Documentation Case Study: PMP Instructions to students: use the template below to develop the sections of the PMP relevant to Cost, Quality and Risk Management for the case study project. Project Management Plan Cost Management Plan Cost management concepts, processes, and techniques to be applied e.g. How will cost plans be developed and who should be involved? Will Earned Value Management be used? What is the tolerance for being over budget? Are there any rewards or penalties for being under/over budget? Are there any funding or cash-flow constraints, such as annual budget cycles? How will human resources be charged to the project (if at all)? How much contingency will be calculated? How will indirect costs be captured? Are profit or amortised costs to be considered? What bank/cost/control accounts will be set up? How and when will committed/receipted costs be captured? · Quality Management Plan Quality management concepts, processes, and techniques to be applied e.g. How will quality requirements be identified and who needs to be consulted? Whose definition of quality needs to be considered? Are there any penalties or rewards for under/over-delivering on quality? What needs to be considered – e.g. end user preferences; product lifecycle and through-life/maintenance costs; obsolescence? · Risk Management Plan Risk management concepts, processes, and techniques to be applied e.g. Who needs to be involved in Risk Management? What policies, guidelines and standards are to be complied with? How will risks be identified? What risk categories will be considered (e.g. WHS and Environmental Risk)? What likelihood and impact classifications will be used? How will risk treatment strategies be funded? (e.g. work package contingency?) How will issues be managed/reported? How will open risks be handed over at the end of the project? · Risk context What is relevant about the context of the project and should be taken into consideration when identifying, analysing and managing risk? What existing risk controls are in place? · Frequency and format How frequently and in what format will you hold risk reviews to maintain currency of risk plans and ensure that treatment strategies have been implemented effectively? · [ASSESSOR USE ONLY] Assessment Result Assessment Result Satisfactory Not Satisfactory If NS, resubmit – due: Click or tap to enter a date. Assessor Feedback … Case Study: Quality Plan Instructions to students: Develop this sub-plan for the case study project by completing the template below electronically in Word. Quality Plan Deliverable A product, process, service, or result Stakeholder input Who needs to be involved in defining quality requirements? Quality definition What features, functions and attributes will make it ‘fit for purpose’? Acceptance criteria The test of ‘good enough’ – an objective measure of minimum acceptable quality Applicable standards (if any) e.g. Technical/functional standards, Australian/ ISO/ Industry standards or codes, organisational policies. Quality Assurance What will be done to ensure that products and processes WILL meet the quality definition? Quality Control What will be done to check that completed products and processes HAVE met the quality definition? Renewing potable water main Engineering teams Water quality Operations Community Engagement teams Durability Sustainability Relevant asset, etc size Pressure test Water quality test Trail Disinfection of asset Business case Water Standards Authority Australia Sydney Water Design guidelines Engineering assessment Operational assessment Hydraulic Modelling PCP – post completion package review Field Inspection / Audit Desk top audit – etc photos of site IT Scheduling tool Planning Teams Digital Heads of business Operational Teams Integration with current platforms Adapt to whole of business Functionality with current devices Staff survey results Improvement in scheduling performance Current KPI trends improving Sydney Water digital governance standards ISO standards Stakeholder engagement forums / sessions Approvals through IT Governance team Trail and onboarding training Data has been transferred and all reports are not missing any data 30 maintenance holes Water Service Coordinator Tap in – Sydney Water website Operations Developer Water Standards Authority Australia Operational – etc relevant size/high structures Pressure testing assess before commissioning Water Standards Authority Australia Sydney Water Standards WSC submits request via website and Sydney Water will approve if standard design or refer to customer to engage WSC. If WSC is engaged engineering review, operational review is required PCP – Post completion package Field Inspection / Audit Desk top audit – etc photos of site [ASSESSOR USE ONLY] Assessment Result Assessment Result Satisfactory Not Satisfactory If NS, resubmit – due: Click or tap to enter a date. Assessor Feedback … Case Study: Quality Control Tools Select two QC tools and apply these to the case study as a means of identifying and removing defective products and/or processes. Create the tool below using Charts and explain how this tool and the data that it represents would support quality control. 1st QC tool: Chart depicting the application of the tool to the case study: Explanation: Treated Water Quality Parameters The sampling and monitoring data collected during commissioning of the new treatment facility has been plotted on a spider graph. · Bacteria · Helminths · Turbidity · Chloride · Sodium 2nd QC tool: Chart depicting the application of the tool to the case study: depicting the application of the tool to the case study: Explanation: Fishbone diagram QC tool to brainstorm work process issue with ‘Inspection and remediations of maintenance holes and vent shafts’ task falling behind schedule. [ASSESSOR USE ONLY] Assessment Result Assessment Result Satisfactory Not Satisfactory If NS, resubmit – due: Click or tap to enter a date. Assessor Feedback … Case Study: Risk Register Instructions to students: Develop a risk register register for the case study project using the matrix and classificaiton tables below. Include three threats from the following risk categories: Schedule, Financial, Service Delivery (business continuity, ability for BAU to continue to operate effectively). Classification Table - Likelihood Likelihood Description Probability Almost Certain Is almost certain to occur within the foreseeable future or within the project timeframe >90% Likely Is likely to occur within the foreseeable future or within the project timeframe 51-90% Possible May occur within the foreseeable future or within the project timeframe 16-50% Unlikely Is not likely to occur within the foreseeable future or within the project timeframe 6-15% Very Unlikely Will only occur in exceptional circumstances<5% classification="" table="" -="" threat="" category="" insignificant="" minor="" moderate="" major="" extreme="" health="" &="" safety="" incident="" with="" no="" medical="" treatment="" required="" minor="" injury="" –="" first="" aid="" treatment="" only="" injury="" requiring="" medical="" treatment="" or="" more="" than="" 1="" day="" off="" work="" one="" or="" multiple="" serious="" injuries="" requiring="" medical="" treatment,="" hospitalisation,="" or="" more="" than="" 5="" days="" off="" work="" loss="" of="" life="" or="" permanent="" disability="" legal="" &="" compliance="" breaches="" of="" a="" technical="" nature="" that="" do="" not="" expose="" the="" organization="" to="" legal="" action="" or="" can="" be="" managed="" through="" bau="" activities/existing="" risk="" controls="" breach="" resulting="" in="" exposure="" to="" civil="" action="" breach="" resulting="" in="" threats="" of="" legal="" action="" (civil="" and="" criminal)=""><$100k, or="" licenses/permits="" being="" revoked="" breach="" resulting="" in="" government="" enquiry,="" fines,="" prosecution,="" or="" litigation="">$100K, or closure of key services Breach resulting in major public/regulatory scrutiny, prosecution, imprisonment, fines/litigation >$500K Financial Project completed over budget but within tolerance or below 5% Project completed 6-10% over budget Project completed 11-15% over budget Project completed 16-50% over budget Project completed more than 50% over budget Service Delivery Minor disruption to operations or delivery of services in BAU Interruption to operations/delivery of services for less than 1 day Disruption to operations/delivery of services for 1-5 business days Disruption causing significant client complaints, reputational damage, or inquiries by regulator Disruption dramatically affecting client relationships, pipeline, reputation, or interference by regulator Classification Table - Opportunity Category Insignificant Minor Moderate Major Extreme Health & Safety Occasional improvement in an individuals’ health, safety and wellbeing of personnel Small improvement in health, safety and wellbeing of personnel within one division (localised) Small improvement to health, safety and wellbeing of personnel across all divisions (systemic) Significant improvement to health, safety and wellbeing of personnel in some divisions Significant improvement to health, safety and wellbeing of personnel across all divisions (systemic) Reputation Recognition by a few individuals Recognition by local community groups Positive local press coverage or nomination for award Positive state press coverage or award win Positive national/ international press coverage Financial Project completed 0-5% under budget or equivalent expansion of scope/quality Project completed 6-10% under budget or equivalent expansion of scope/quality Project completed 11-15% under budget or equivalent expansion of scope/quality Project completed 16--50% under budget or equivalent expansion of scope/quality Project completed more than 50%