Read Gould and Lewontin’s (1979) paper, “The Spandrels of San Marcos and the
Paglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme” in volume 205
(pp. 581–598) of the Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B. List
both the merits and flaws in Gould and Lewontin’s approach. Overall, do you think
their critique is a fair one?
Already registered? Login
Not Account? Sign up
Enter your email address to reset your password
Back to Login? Click here