Rachels argues that utilitarianism would hold that active euthanasia is morally right so long as the patient consented to it. Suppose you were a rule utilitarian and you disagreed with Rachel’s...

Rachels argues that utilitarianism would hold that active euthanasia is morally right so long as the patient consented to it. Suppose you were a rule utilitarian and you disagreed with Rachel’s conclusion. How could a rule utilitarian argue that active euthanasia even with the patient’s consent is morally wrong?