Assessment Type: Group Assignment - Report and Video Presentation. All members of the group will be assessed equally on the group presentation (see marking below). Group members must be confirmed with...

1 answer below »
Question in word file, have a proper look at it before confirming


Assessment Type: Group Assignment - Report and Video Presentation. All members of the group will be assessed equally on the group presentation (see marking below). Group members must be confirmed with your tutor and must include 3-4 people. Purpose: To allow students to demonstrate the application of knowledge and skills acquired in the subject. It also allows students to further develop teamwork skills that are expected in a modern professional accounting practice. This assessment relates to learning outcomes a, b, c and d. Topic: Identify and apply theories and models in accounting to a current topical issue related to a corporation of your choice from a list of corporations provided (note approval must be sought from your lecturers and tutors). You are required to demonstrate your understanding of your chosen accounting theories to matter current to the approved corporation by reference to published material from the corporation and other related sources. Task Details: Choose a firm from a list of corporations provided by your lecturer / tutor, then find a news piece related to your chosen firm’s issues. Pick one of the following issues: Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) or Capital Market Reactions (CMR). Identify and rationalise with appropriate accounting theories, the motive, effectiveness and impact of the firm’s CSR/CMR disclosures in addressing these issues. Based on the case findings, groups must make recommendations on CSR/CMR reporting at the corporation level as well as at regulatory level. Emphasis must be given to effectiveness of CSR/CMR disclosures. Group Presentation: Groups are to present their analysis and findings/ conclusions in a professional 5 (five)-minute video presentation. Presentations should be a critical analysis covering the main theory elements of the course – not just presenting a factual story – reference to corporate reports and other material is encouraged. Information can be covered in any order in the presentation, but should contain elements of the course. It is strongly recommended that groups prepare their presentations well in advance of the presentation date, and make some effort to review their video presentation. This will improve the presentation overall, and give groups a chance to improve and time manage their presentations. Videos may be prepared using any available platform such as iMovie, MovieMaker, Prezi and others. Students are reminded that extensive use of third-party video materials in their video presentations may increase the risk of plagiarism. Research Requirements: Students need to support their analysis with references from the text and a minimum of ten (10) suitable, reliable, current and academically acceptable sources – check with your tutor if unsure of the validity of sources. Groups seeking Credit or above grades should support their analysis with increased number of reference sources comparable to the grade they are seeking. Report: 2500 word report format – Word .doc or .docx. Title page, executive summary, table of contents, appropriate headings and sub-headings, recommendations/findings/conclusions, in-text referencing and reference list (Harvard – Anglia style), attachments if relevant. Single spaced, font Times New Roman 12pt. Video Presentation: 5-minute video presentation in class supported by appropriate visual aids. Marking Guide: Group report: 10% Research – extent and application 30% Analysis 30% Recommendations/conclusions 20% Report content 20%. Total mark will be scaled to a mark out of 10 subject marks. Group Presentation: 15% A group mark will be given for the team component of the presentation and a mark will be scaled to a mark out of 15 subject marks. Detailed marking guides are in the following rubric. Research – extent and application 30% Analysis 30% Recommendations/conclusions 20% Video content 20%. Total mark will be scaled to a mark out of 15 subject marks. Marking Rubric for ACC706 Accounting Theory and Issues (Assignment 2 Group Report and Weekly Progress Report) Criteria Fail (0 – 49%) Pass (50 – 64%) Credit (65 – 74%) Distinction (75 – 84%) High Distinction (85 – 100%) Research – extent and application Value 30% Mark awarded Inaccurate, inappropriate or no use of literature. Analysis not developed. No original explanations provided. Minimum number of sources, not all current or relevant. Paraphrasing used throughout but not always accompanied by original explanations. Theory relevant but not always linked to analysis. Good selection of theory from a range of sources to build and adequately justifies analysis. Paraphrasing used throughout but accompanied by original explanations Insightful and appropriate selection of theory from a good range of current and relevant sources to systematically build and justify analysis. Minimum paraphrasing Integration and originality in the selection and handling of relevant theory to build and justify analysis. Wide range of current and relevant sources integrated in systematic way. Analysis of the organisation Value 30% Mark awarded Poor evaluation. Significant gaps in knowledge of the theory and lack of understanding of company’s capabilities. Minimal analysis provided. Disjointed or no discussion. Simple discussion of areas of strength and weakness in the organisation’s capabilities. Work reflects limited engagement with organisational context or relevant theory. Not all aspects of task completed In sufficient detail. Most aspects of the task completed but assessment lacks cohesion. Identifies and discusses areas of strength and weakness in the organisation’s capabilities. Discussion of some relevant issues in theory and organisational content in evaluation. All aspects of the task completed – some cohesion. Identifies and clearly explains areas of strength and weakness in the organisation’s capabilities. Links to organisational context and relevant theory in evaluation. All aspects of the task completed with minimal errors in cohesion Identifies and insightfully discusses areas of strength and weakness in the organisation’s capabilities. Strong links to organisational context and relevant theory in evaluation. All aspects of the task completed in a comprehensive and cohesive manner Recommendations / conclusions Value 20% Mark awarded Few or no recommendations made / no justification. Any recommendations made are not supported or are inaccurate. Some recommendations made / not well linked to the results of the evaluation or relevant theory. Good recommendations made, linked to the evaluation results / may not be linked back systematically to relevant theory Very good recommendations made, linked to the evaluation. Theory used systematically to justify recommendations and discuss enhancement of the organisation’s capabilities Excellent recommendations made, linked to the evaluation. Theory used in insightful way to justify recommendations and discuss enhancement of the organisation’s capabilities Report Content Value 20% Mark awarded Referencing is absent / not systematic / incorrect Acceptable content – obvious errors demonstrating lack of attention to detail. Some attempt at referencing but obvious errors Good content overall but some obvious errors. Referencing is mainly accurate Professional content– minor errors in some elements. Correct referencing throughout Highly professional content – satisfies all the elements for an exceptional report. Correct referencing throughout Weekly Progress Report Assessment Mark /5 Student does not submit log of videos Students submits weekly progress report however required number and comments not achieved Students submits weekly progress report and a majority of required number and comments achieved Students submits weekly progress report and most required number and comments achieved Students submits weekly progress report and required number and comments achieved Total mark out of 100 for group report and weekly progress report /15 Assessment mark /15 C706 Accounting Theory and Issues (Assignment 2 Presentation) Criteria Fail (0 – 49%) Pass (50 – 64%) Credit (65 – 74%) Distinction (75 – 84%) High Distinction (85 – 100%) Research – extent and application Value 30% Mark awarded Inaccurate, inappropriate or no use of research materials. Analysis not developed. No original explanations provided. Minimum number of sources, not all current or relevant. Material not always accompanied by original explanations. Theory not always linked to analysis. Good selection of theory from a range of sources to build and adequately justifies analysis to content in the video. Research accompanied by original explanations Insightful and appropriate selection of theory from a good range of current and relevant sources to systematically build and justify analysis in the video. Minimum paraphrasing Integration and originality in the selection and handling of relevant theory to build and justify analysis in the video. Wide range of current and relevant sources integrated in systematic way. Analysis of the organisation Value 30% Mark awarded Poor evaluation. Significant gaps in knowledge of the theory and lack of understanding of company’s capabilities. Minimal analysis provided. Disjointed or no discussion. Simple discussion of areas of strength and weakness in the organisation’s capabilities. Work reflects limited engagement with organisational context or relevant theory. Not all aspects of task completed In sufficient detail. Most aspects of the task completed but assessment lacks cohesion. Identifies and discusses areas of strength and weakness in the organisation’s capabilities. Discussion of some relevant issues in theory and organisational content in evaluation. All aspects of the task completed – some cohesion. Identifies and clearly explains areas of strength and weakness in the organisation’s capabilities. Links to organisational context and relevant theory in evaluation. All aspects of the task completed with minimal errors in cohesion Identifies and insightfully discusses areas of strength and weakness in the organisation’s capabilities. Strong links to organisational context and relevant theory in evaluation. All aspects of the task completed in a comprehensive and cohesive manner Recommendations / conclusions Value 20% Mark awarded Few or no recommendations made / no justification. Any recommendations made are not supported or are inaccurate. Some recommendations made / not well linked to the results of the evaluation or relevant theory. Good recommendations made, linked to the evaluation results / may not be linked back systematically to relevant theory Very good recommendations made, linked to the evaluation. Theory used systematically to justify recommendations and discuss enhancement of the organisation’s capabilities Excellent recommendations made, linked to the evaluation. Theory used in insightful way to justify recommendations and discuss enhancement of the organisation’s capabilities Video content Value 20% Mark awarded Content is absent / not systematic / incorrect Acceptable content – obvious errors demonstrating lack of attention to detail. Some attempt at critical application but obvious errors Good content overall but some obvious errors. Critical application is mainly accurate Professional content– minor errors in some elements. Correct critical application throughout Highly professional content – satisfies all the elements for an exceptional video. Correct critical application throughout Total mark out of 100 for presentation Assessment mark /15
Answered Same DaySep 09, 2021

Answer To: Assessment Type: Group Assignment - Report and Video Presentation. All members of the group will be...

Tanmoy answered on Sep 11 2021
152 Votes
Topic: Identify and apply theories and models in accounting to a current topical issue related to Rio Tinto
Student Name: Sudarshan
Executive Summary
Rio Tinto is the second largest mining company in Australia behind BHP. They are experts in production of iron ore, diamonds, aluminium, uranium and copper. It was founded under a transnational consortium in Spain by investors of mine complex in the year 1873. It is a company which is listed both on London Stock Exchange and Australian Stock Exchange. It also trades its American Depository Shares in the New York Stock Exchange. The mining
and extraction of minerals and ores lead to various hazards like water scarcity, environmental pollution, social, economic and financial risks. To overcome these issues there is need to adhere to the ethical standards and sustainable developmental programs. This will encourage the corporate social responsibility which is the call of the day for every industries and companies operating in their respective communities. In this research we will analyse the annual report of Rio Tinto from 2015 to 2019 to determine the accounting models used by the organization to create corporate social responsibilities by implementation of sustainable development programs like water conservation, community investment, and employees’ health, reduction in green house gases and industrial effluents and carbon emission. We will also research on the achievements made in this regard by Rio Tinto till now and the penalties and fines imposed on them due to non-adherence to these norms.
Table of Content
Analysis…………………………………………………………………Pg 1 to 2
Sustainability Report 2019 Rio Tinto…………………………………...Pg 2 to 4
Impact on Rio Tinto Financial Statement……………………………….Pg 5 to 7
Findings – Fines and Penalties…………………………………………..Pg 7 to 8
Conclusion………………………………………………………………..Pg 8
References………………………………………………………………...Pg 9
Analysis
Rio Tinto is a mining company headquartered in Australia and various parts of the world. Rio Tinto operates in more than 36 countries with mines, smelters and refineries and also have their offices situated in different locations having modernized sales offices, data centers, research and developmental labs. Rio Tinto deals with extraction of various mineral resources like iron ore, copper, salt, aluminium, borates, titanium dioxide and diamonds. In the year 1990, Rio Tinto was able to deliver safe, fair and sustainable mining and metal industry through the sustainable development initiative conducted by the International Council of Mining and Metals (ICMM). In 2008, Rio Tinto was able to launch the world’s first driverless car fully automated, heavy haul rail network and for heavy duty – AutoHaul using the next generation automation technology. This world’s largest robot helped Rio Tinto to run their operations more smoothly, efficiently, with safety and minimized the cost of production. Also, there was clear evidence of Rio Tinto following ethics where it is observed that the company was able to publish a tax report in 2010 of taxes and royalties payment to the government mentioned in the report which also helped them to create trust and credibility. In the 2012 London Olympics, Rio Tinto supplied approximately 8 tonnes of gold, silver and copper for making 4700 medals. Their ethical, environmental friendly and sustainable practice is also reflected as been the founding member of Responsible Jeweller Council (RJC). In 2015, Rio Tinto signed a pack with the Paris government to support them in every possible ways to restrict the global temperature rise to less than 2°C. In 2016, Rio Tinto introduced the world’s first low carbon certified aluminium which contained less than 4 tonnes of carbon dioxide per tonne of aluminium known as ‘Renewal’. In 2018, Rio Tinto declared themselves as the first major mining organization to be free of fossil fuel production. Thus the accounting model used Social and Environmental Accounting or SEA. In this modelling the role of the accountant or the finance manager is to analyse the social and environmental responsibility and also conduct proper audit, verification of the social and environmental reports. Thus in terms of social and environmental accounting, it is the duty of the financial accountant to verify the assets and liabilities of the social and environmental features and publish report on the same as per the standards specified in the corporate social responsibility. (Medley, 1997; Igalens, 2006)
Sustainability report 2019
As per the latest sustainability report of Rio Tinto 2019, the ultimate aim of initiating the corporate social responsibility is to generate long term growth and earn sustainable profitability by investing in the development and modernization of the communities where it operates. The activities contribute to the social development as well as advancement and enhancing the economy of the community. Rio Tinto works as per the United Nations Sustainable Developmental goals and try to focus on water and climate changes, adherence to ethical standards and transparency, human rights and safety and security of the employees. The social and environmental accounting aims at providing transparency and increasing the delivery of corporate social responsibilities to the external stakeholders like the suppliers, government, potential investors, etc from whom the business has non-economic benefits. (O’Dwyer, 2006, p.220)
As per the latest 2019, sustainability report of Rio Tinto there has been a significant falls in the frequency rates of injury over the last 10 years by 48%. There was also a decrease in the rate of occupational illness in 2018 by 34%. In 2009 the all injury frequency rate was 0.81 declined to 0.42 in Rio Tinto per 200000 hours worked in the organization. This is a clear sign of Rio Tinto’s valuing their employees towards the safety and well being of their employees, workers and the daily...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here