Question 1 Ethnic composition in Southeast Asia never really changed that much. Question 1 options: a. This is a false statement. This is so because SEA is a diverse region. This diversity came from the European migration that happened during the time of colonization. b. This is a fallacious statement. As what we all know, SEA has become so diverse. The reason for such is the migration of different people. c. This is a true statement. If you look at the composition of SEA, yes it is diverse but this diversity never really changed. SEA started as very diverse region. d. False. The reason is that, due to the segmented regional economic conditions, influx of diverse population came into economic centers thus changing and adding to the diversity of Southeast Asia. Question 2 What is patron-client relationship/ties? Question 2 options: a. Patron-client ties was prevalent in SEA in the pre-colonial times. It is true that it is the patron (a landlord) who provides benefits for the client (peasant) in exchange for support, loyalty and service. This informal institution has evolved in order to suit the modern times which is no longer agricultural. b. This is a kind of system that allows the client to take whatever it needs from the patron because the patron owes the client loyalty and affinity. c. It is best explained as a give and take relationship because the client who provides for the needs of the patron will ask the patron for help in times of need. The patron in turn gives his full loyalty to the client. d. All these statements are incorrect statements because it is the patron that provides benefits for the clients in exchange for their support, loyalty and service. Although this is the case, patron-client relationship in SEA is now an extinct system because SEA is no longer an agricultural community. Question 3 Did the Europeans who colonized SEA partnered with the local ruling elites in the region? Question 3 options: a. Yes. They did so by marrying the daughters of the local elites. b. No because the Europeans never accepted the local rulers. c. No because they simply wanted to obtain the wealth of the rulers so they did not really mind the local rulers and just proceeded with the extraction of wealth. d. Yes because they needed the help of the local rulers in order to gain the support of the entire population. Question 4 What could be the best explanation why Southeast Asia is a very diverse region. Question 4 options: a. SEA is a region full of more diversity rather than similarities. b. SEA is a region that became a watershed of migration all throughout the world during post-colonial times due to the increasing influence of western rule. c. All the options are correct answers because they all reflect the importance of colonialism in the tracing of the historical evolution of SEA. d. The territorial demarcation during colonial period reflected political convenience of the foreign powers rather than pre-existing ethno-linguistic differences.

Question 1 Ethnic composition in Southeast Asia never really changed that much. Question 1 options: a. This is a false statement. This is so because SEA is a diverse region. This diversity came from...

Question 1 options:

a.	This is a false statement. This is so because SEA is a diverse region. This diversity came from the European migration that happened during the time of colonization.
b.	This is a fallacious statement. As what we all know, SEA has become so diverse. The reason for such is the migration of different people.
c.	This is a true statement. If you look at the composition of SEA, yes it is diverse but this diversity never really changed. SEA started as very diverse region.
d.	False. The reason is that, due to the segmented regional economic conditions, influx of diverse population came into economic centers thus changing and adding to the diversity of Southeast Asia.

What is patron-client relationship/ties?

Question 2 options:

a.	Patron-client ties was prevalent in SEA in the pre-colonial times. It is true that it is the patron (a landlord) who provides benefits for the client (peasant) in exchange for support, loyalty and service. This informal institution has evolved in order to suit the modern times which is no longer agricultural.
b.	This is a kind of system that allows the client to take whatever it needs from the patron because the patron owes the client loyalty and affinity.
c.	It is best explained as a give and take relationship because the client who provides for the needs of the patron will ask the patron for help in times of need. The patron in turn gives his full loyalty to the client.
d.	All these statements are incorrect statements because it is the patron that provides benefits for the clients in exchange for their support, loyalty and service. Although this is the case, patron-client relationship in SEA is now an extinct system because SEA is no longer an agricultural community.

Did the Europeans who colonized SEA partnered with the local ruling elites in the region?

Question 3 options:

a.	Yes. They did so by marrying the daughters of the local elites.
b.	No because the Europeans never accepted the local rulers.
c.	No because they simply wanted to obtain the wealth of the rulers so they did not really mind the local rulers and just proceeded with the extraction of wealth.
d.	Yes because they needed the help of the local rulers in order to gain the support of the entire population.

What could be the best explanation why Southeast Asia is a very diverse region.

Question 4 options:

a.	SEA is a region full of more diversity rather than similarities.
b.	SEA is a region that became a watershed of migration all throughout the world during post-colonial times due to the increasing influence of western rule.
c.	All the options are correct answers because they all reflect the importance of colonialism in the tracing of the historical evolution of SEA.
d.	The territorial demarcation during colonial period reflected political convenience of the foreign powers rather than pre-existing ethno-linguistic differences.

Jun 09, 2022