Quality Improvement ProposalTitle(Insert title of Proposal)1.Introduction1.1Purposeof the proposal for change(Identify the patient safety risk concern that...

1 answer below »









Quality Improvement Proposal






Title








(Insert title of Proposal)






1.








Introduction






1.1








Purpose








of the proposal for change








(


Identify the patient safety risk concern that you






are addressing in your quality improvement initiative. This is looking at what you are






looking to improve). Delete explanation and just keep heading.






1.2








Background








(Provide a background explanation why this patient safety concern is






an issue (you need to support your discussions using current literature). Delete






explanation and just keep heading.






1.3








Objectives








(Identify two (2) objectives (interventions) that you propose to implement






that are specific and achievable to contribute to eliminating the risk of the safety






concern identified. This is looking at how you are going to improve current practices.






Current literature is needed to support your objectives). Delete explanation and just






keep heading.






1.4








Evaluation








of








Change








(Discuss the evaluation phase of change and its importance.






Give two (2) specific examples of how you are going to evaluate change in relation






to your objectives. Current literature should be utilised in this response). Delete






explanation and just keep heading.






2. Stakeholder Communication






2.1








Identification of major stakeholders








(Identify the major stakeholders that would






be








involved








in








your








quality








improvement








initiative.








Consider








all








levels








of






organisational structure when identifying stakeholders. Current literature should be






considered). Delete explanation and just keep heading.






2.2








Engagement and communication with the stakeholders








(Discuss what you






would








communicate








with








stakeholders,








discuss








how








you








would








engage






stakeholders, and discuss why communication with stakeholders is imperative).






Delete explanation and just keep heading.






3. Leadership Style






3.1








Specific leadership style








(Identify an appropriate leadership style that you






would adopt to lead this quality improvement initiative). Delete explanation and just






keep heading.






3.2








Attributes








of the leadership style that will promote success (Discuss two (2)






attributes specific to the leadership style identified and analyse how these attributes






would guide success of the quality improvement initiative). Delete explanation and






just keep heading.












Answered 11 days AfterSep 26, 2024

Answer To: Quality Improvement ProposalTitle(Insert title of...

Dipali answered on Oct 07 2024
6 Votes
WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT        3
WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT
Table of contents
1. Introduction    3
1.1 Purpose of the Proposal for Change    3
1.2 Background    3
1.3 Objectives    4
1.4 Evaluation of Change    4
2. Stakeholder Communication    5
2.1 Examining the Main Actors    5
2.2 Outreach and Interactions with the Client    6
3. Leadership Style    6
3.1 Specific Leadership Style    6
3.2. Other Qualities of the L
eadership Style That Supports Success    7
4. Barriers to Change    8
4.1 Organisational Barrier    8
4.2 Individual Barrier    8
References    10
Quality Improvement Proposal
Title: Enhancing Communication Practices to Reduce Patient Safety Risks in Surgical Wards
1. Introduction
1.1 Purpose of the Proposal for Change
The main aim of developing this proposal is to fix a shortcoming of communicating in health facilities especially the surgical ward. They are among the leading causes of avoidable medical mistakes resulting in patient harm, longer hospitalization and raised expenses. In essence, this quality improvement work intends to minimise the frequency of these errors by elevating the exchanges among the personnel of the healthcare services as well as raising the safety and quality of the services provided to the patients.
1.2 Background
It is established that communication breakdowns in care organizations are a root cause of adverse events in health care. Healthcare workers notes that inadequate communication is highly associated with medical errors, slow treatment, and improper patient management suggested by (Aldawood et al., 2020). This is especially so in the intensive area of operating theatres, where refined and unambiguous communication is vital and may be severely hampered through the use of interpreter. The Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2024) states that communication failures remain a major source of adverse events which could be minimized with structured communication tools and better interdisciplinary teamwork. Solving this problem is necessary not only to improve patient conditions but also to increase coherence between employees and decrease unnecessary waste.
1.3 Objectives
· Objective 1: The communication protocol to be adopted is the SBAR protocol; apply this tool in the handover process of patient from shift to shift in the surgical ward. This tool has been created to facilitate retrieval and review of specific information with an aim of minimising on misunderstandings and to check on the consistency in conveying details.
· Objective 2: The proposed beginning quarterly interdisciplinary communication workshops for purpose of enhancing communication among members of staff focusing on matters of weakness, stress. These workshops will cover elements such as listening to a relevant patient case, speaking about a patient’s facts, and effective collaboration during handover.
1.4 Evaluation of Change
Its necessity arises from the need to determine the effectiveness of the suggested activities to enhance patient safety levels. Two specific evaluation methods will be used:
· Evaluation Method 1: An examination based on the occurrence of incident reports concerning communication mishaps will be done before and after the implementation of the plan. In specific, the audit will include the use of erasures in the number of errors noted before the implementation of the SBAR tool and after. The number of people involved in communication-related accidents will also be smaller if the intervention is successful.
· Evaluation Method 2: Self-assessment questionnaires of staff intercommunication effectiveness will be conducted before and after the interdisciplinary workshops. The surveys will assess the enhancements in the quality of handovers received regarding clarity and the quality of teamwork. Improved feedback with positive connotations will clearly illustrate the benefits of the workshops in...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here