This criterion is linked to a learning outcomePresentation of assignment (10 Marks)Submission follows SUT requirements. Accurate spelling, grammar, punctuation. Cohesively writing. Meets word limit. |
10.0to >7.0PtsHigh Distinction 100-80Fluent writing style. Grammar and spelling accurate. Evidence of a cohesive and polished report. Meets word limit and submission requirements. |
7.0to >6.0PtsDistinction 79-70Language fluent. Grammar and spelling accurate. Mostly cohesively written report. Meets word limit and submission requirements. |
6.0to >5.0PtsCredit 69-60Language mainly clear and fluent. Grammar and spelling overall accurate. Shows an attempt in cohesively write but not evident throughout. Meets word limit and submission requirements. |
5.0to >4.0PtsPass 59-50Meaning apparent but language not always fluent or clear. Grammar and/or spelling contains errors. Report lacks clear cohesion of writing. Submission requirements or word limit not met. |
4.0to >0PtsFail Meaning unclear and/ grammar and spelling contains frequent errors. Poorly presented and not cohesive. |
|
10.0pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeProject Overview (10 Marks)Overview of your project: context, global or local health care structure. Motivation for undertaking the project |
10.0to >7.0PtsHigh Distinction 100-80Clear and comprehensive overview of your project: including context, global or local health care structure. Clear and comprehensive explanation of motivation for undertaking the project. |
7.0to >6.0PtsDistinction 79-70Clear overview of your project: including context, global or local health care structure. Clear explanation of motivation for undertaking the project. |
6.0to >5.0PtsCredit 69-60Brief overview of your project: including context, global or local health care structure. Brief explanation of motivation for undertaking the project. |
5.0to >4.0PtsPass 59-50Limited overview of your project: including context, global or local health care structure. Limited explanation of motivation for undertaking the project. |
4.0to >0PtsFail Project overview and motivations unclear clear or absent. |
|
10.0pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeStrengths-Based Nursing (5 Marks)Identification and explanation of relevant strengths based nursing elements related to your project |
5.0to >3.5PtsHigh Distinction 100-80Appropriate identification and comprehensive explanation of 1-2 relevant strengths based nursing values well related to the project. |
3.5to >3.0PtsDistinction 79-70Mostly appropriate identification and explanation of 1-2 relevant strengths-based nursing values. Well related to the project. |
3.0to >2.5PtsCredit 69-60Appropriate identification but brief explanation of 1-2 strengths-based nursing values. Partially related to the project. |
2.5to >2.0PtsPass 59-50Limited identification and explanation of strengths based nursing values. Limited relationship to the project. |
2.0to >0PtsFail No or unclear identification and explanation of strengths-based values related to the project. |
|
5.0pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeObjectives & Milestones (10 Marks)Identification of objectives, milestones and budget (if relevant), were they met, evidence to show achievement. |
10.0to >7.0PtsHigh Distinction 100-80Appropriate identification of objectives, milestones and budget (if relevant). Clear, comprehensive and engaging explanation and evidence of if and how these were meet. Clear and comprehensive link between objectives and milestones. |
7.0to >6.0PtsDistinction 79-70Appropriate identification of objectives, milestones and budget (if relevant). Clear and engaging explanation and evidence of if and how these were meet. Clear link between objectives and milestones. |
6.0to >5.0PtsCredit 69-60Brief identification of objectives, milestones and budget (if relevant). Brief explanation and evidence of if and how these were meet. Brief link between objectives and milestones. |
5.0to >4.0PtsPass 59-50Limited identification of objectives, milestones and budget (if relevant). Limited explanation and evidence of if and how these were meet. Limited/no connection between objectives and milestones. |
4.0to >0PtsFail No or unclear identification of objectives, milestones and budget (if relevant). No or unclear explanation and evidence of if and how these were meet. |
|
10.0pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeIssues (10 Marks)Identification of problems encountered on the project. Explanation of how were these were managed. |
10.0to >7.0PtsHigh Distinction 100-80Reflective and appropriate identification of problems. Clear, comprehensive problem solving and explanation of how were these were managed. |
7.0to >6.0PtsDistinction 79-70Reflective and appropriate identification of problems. Clear problem solving and explanation of how were these were managed. |
6.0to >5.0PtsCredit 69-60Brief identification of problems. Brief problem solving and explanation of how were these were managed. |
5.0to >4.0PtsPass 59-50Limited identification of problems. Limited problem solving and explanation of how were these were managed. |
4.0to >0PtsFail No or unclear identification and explanation of problems and how these were managed. |
|
10.0pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeClosure & feedback (10 Marks)Identification and utilisation of feedback |
10.0to >7.0PtsHigh Distinction 100-80Comprehensive solicitation of feedback from a wide variety of sources. Clear and comprehensive explanation of how feedback was utilised for reporting and improvement. |
7.0to >6.0PtsDistinction 79-70Clear solicitation of feedback from a variety of sources. Clear explanation of how feedback was utilised for reporting and improvement. |
6.0to >5.0PtsCredit 69-60Brief solicitation of feedback. Brief explanation of how feedback was utilised for reporting and improvement. |
5.0to >4.0PtsPass 59-50Limited solicitation of feedback. Limited explanation of how feedback was utilised for reporting and improvement. |
4.0to >0PtsFail Unclear or no solicitation of feedback and how feedback was utilised for reporting and improvement. |
|
10.0pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeLessons learned (10 Marks)Identification and explanation of lessons learned during the project using the modified Gibbs reflective cycle. |
10.0to >7.0PtsHigh Distinction 100-80Comprehensively identifies all elements of the modified Gibbs cycle to clearly and succinctly reflect on the project experience with comprehensive identification of changes for future projects. |
7.0to >6.0PtsDistinction 79-70Clearly identifies all elements of the modified Gibbs cycle to clearly reflect on the project experience with clear identification of changes for future projects. |
6.0to >5.0PtsCredit 69-60Brief identification of the modified Gibbs cycle. Brief reflection on the project experience and identification of changes for future projects. |
5.0to >4.0PtsPass 59-50Limited identification of the modified Gibbs cycle. Limited reflection on the project experience and identification of changes for future projects. |
4.0to >0PtsFail No or unclear identification of the modified Gibbs reflective cycle and identification for changes for future projects. |
|
10.0pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeReferencing (5 Marks)Follows APA style 7th ed. Use of
broad range of sources. References no earlier than 2010. |
5.0to >4.0PtsHigh Distinction 100-80Range (3) of high-quality sources which have been accurately included in accordance with APA style 7th ed. No errors in reference list. |
4.0to >3.0PtsDistinction 79-70Adequate variety and quality of sources (3). Adherence to APA style 7th ed. Minor errors in reference list only. |
3.0to >2.5PtsCredit 69-60Adequate number of sources (3) relevant to the subject. Mostly adheres to APA style 7th ed. Minimal errors in a reference list or in text. |
2.5to >2.0PtsPass 59-50Minimal use of literature sources ( |
2.0to >0PtsFail Either no evidence of literature being consulted or use of an irrelevant, old or very small number of sources. Omission or major errors in a reference list and in text. |
|
5.0pts
|
Total points:70.0 |