Productive Counterargument Prompt: The Productive Counterargument engages in mutually productive deliberation on a local issue. State your argument in direct response to an opposing view. Your goal is...

1 answer below »


Productive Counterargument








Prompt:The Productive Counterargument engages in mutually productive deliberation on a local issue. State your argument in direct response to an opposing view. Your goal is to listen rhetorically to other positions (what do they believe--and why?), civilly engage with an opposing view (you may need to concede some points), and influence a skeptical audience to understand your position.




Process:Identify a problem or issue that merits your taking a stand and identify one published position that differs from your own. As part of yourproposal, provide a copy (or link) of the existing argument you would like to refute. Explain your exigence and purpose for addressing this topic, and identify an audience you can address.



As you aredrafting, introduce the issue and explain the argument to which you are responding in your introduction. Conclude your introduction with a clear thesis statement that articulates your counterargument. Then, in the body paragraphs, craft strong topic sentences that refute relevant points of the initial argument and advance a position of your own. To support your position, you should have sufficient evidence (from credible sources) that is properly integrated, cited, and developed through your own reasoning.



After drafting, you will switch drafts with a classmate and conduct apeer evaluation; their feedback will inform your revisions. Edit and proofread your work before submitting the final draft.



The one-page cover letter should explain your rhetorical decision-making; for this paper, it should include: (1) the common ground you have established with your rhetorical audience, and (2) how you have used the available means of persuasion to assert the validity of your position to that audience.




Style:In addition to a correctly used introductory or parenthetical expression set off by commas and a correctly integrated and punctuated quotation, you will be asked to include coordinating and subordinating conjunctions (at least one of each).




Format:Your final draft should be 4-5 pages (double-spaced, TNR font, 1” margins). When citing your outside source(s), follow MLA format (seeNHGCh. 19 and/or the PSU Libraries’ Citation Research Guide: http://guides.libraries.psu.edu/mlacitation).




Criteria for Evaluation:Your essay should



  1. respond to an existing argument with a rhetorically effective counterargument, driven by a



clear thesis statement and topic sentences, and addressing a specific rhetorical audience;



  1. use research that is credible, appropriate, and properly cited following MLA guidelines

  2. employ an introductory or parenthetical expression set off by commas, a correctly integrated and



punctuated quotation, and subordinating and coordinating conjunctions (at least one each).



Answered Same DayMar 29, 2021

Answer To: Productive Counterargument Prompt: The Productive Counterargument engages in mutually productive...

Ishika answered on Mar 30 2021
151 Votes
Counter-Argument Essay
Should college athletes be paid?
In response to Should college athletes be paid? I think that student athletes from college should be paid, but what is the real issue? I would like to suggest the payment of athle
tes based on results, season end ranking or total income. This contentious subject has many solutions. For example, the University of Northwestern agreed to unite and press for equal care and more money than athletes at the university. The idea was challenged whether they were paying for their jobs, that these athletes are "exploited" and should be compensated. The debate could take a slightly different direction and connect up with the academics, allowing athletes to keep up on time.
The ESPN Article I used, had a very difficult and complex reason on the discussion whether or not university athletes had to be paid. There has been a ongoing debate on whether and what they lose playing for the athletes of students should be paid for. The discussion was brought to a halt because there was no consensus as to how much students in different sports schools would be paid for. With partial justification.
Some who claim that just because the "student" of student athletes means school cares for their athletes, it is true they do so as long as any player they support earns money. You get off the "player." Just like all other sports, like the NFL and NBA, you leave with a band. The whole situation is seen as an endeavor only so that universities can improve their prestige and look good when doing so. So long so they hire the best of the best, what happens to the athlete doesn't matter, unless they are seriously injured. These students are aware of what they are doing to sign a contract that legally binds them to their education.
Essentially, college athletes will not be charged because it poses more concerns and does not offer the money equally. The key thing to draw from this article is that no matter how much it is pushed by student athletes, it rarely works because there are so many issues. How do you decide how much an athlete pays at any sport position? If a few are put on a player or a sport, then people who do less would assume that a sport is not good enough to earn pay like other sports.
Most students think why does this school need me if I don't get a ton back? In the long run, they don't care about...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here