advance networking assignment
Prepared by: Mr. Tarek Elwan Moderated by: Dr. Ghassan kbar Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines Unit Code BN321 Unit Title Advanced Network Design Assessment Type Group written report ( 2 Students ) – T1 2019 (Assignment 2) Assessment Title Network Requirement analysis and Design Purpose of the assessment (with ULO Mapping) After successful completion of this assignment, students should be able to: Apply concepts and theories of human factors as related to network design and implementation Compare performance metrics and dimensions according to specifications Weight 15% of the total assessments Total Marks 50 Word limit 1200 - 1500 Due Date 31st May 2019 (23:55) Submission Guidelines All work must be submitted on Moodle by the due date along with a completed Assignment Cover Page. The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 11-pt Calibri (Body) font and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings. Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using IEEE referencing style. Extension If an extension of time to submit work is required, a Special Consideration Application must be submitted directly to the School's Administration Officer, on academic reception level. You must submit this application within three working days of the assessment due date. Further information is available at: http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures- and-guidelines/specialconsiderationdeferment Academic Misconduct Academic Misconduct is a serious offence. Depending on the seriousness of the case, penalties can vary from a written warning or zero marks to exclusion from the course or rescinding the degree. Students should make themselves familiar with the full policy and procedure available at: http://www.mit.edu.au/about- mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism- Academic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure. For further information, please refer to the Academic Integrity Section in your Unit Description. http://www.mit.edu.au/about http://www.mit.edu.au/about http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure BN321 Advanced Network Design Page 2 of 4 Prepared by: Mr. Tarek Elwan Moderated by: Dr. Ghassan kbar Assignment Description Objectives: ABC is a small IT Support business under development. You have been hired as an IT administrator to design and implement the office IT infrastructure and provide a full IT solution. It is understood that the ABC intend to go with the latest IT technology however, reasonable budget and expending is highly recommended. In a face-to face meeting with the ABC manager, you have been given general information about the required development and you have been advice to collect the rest of the requirements using different collecting data techniques. ABC will have 2 sites one in Sydney and the other in Melbourne. Sydney will have a total of 30 employees and Melbourne will have 20 Employees. Both Sites will have Customer Services, IT however, Sydney site will have 2 extra Departments HR and Accounting. You are required to provide a full IT proposal which include two Tasks: Task 1: Gather (user, application, device and network requirements) with the help of different techniques such as Interview, questionnaire, etc. Give sample of these requirements and the techniques which have been used to collect these data. Task 2: Based on the requirements identified at Task1, design a WAN structure for the ABC showing full devices such as routers, switches, links, etc. by Using a relevant network designing software. Draw a diagram to illustrate your high level design Determine the Network Addresses by using the subnet 192.168.P.0/24, where P is your group number. You also need to use VLSM technique, subnet both networks and allow 30% for possible future expansion. You need to explain the technical Aspects for the choosing devices such routers, switches, hubs, Aps, cables, servers ,etc. (Using either Netsim or GNS3 or Packet Tracer) Configure the topology devices with basic configurations, routing and NAT. Extra configuration such as VLAN and Port security entitled to extra marks. Marking criteria: Sections to be included in the report Description of the section Marks Task 1 Requirements Gathering Requirements Gathering from for Users, Devices, Application and Network. 10 Technique used for collecting requirements in Task 1 Clarity of Technique used in a way to collect maximum requirements. 5 Task 2 Network Design & subnetting Include a diagram of your designed network, and write justifications of your design 10 Devices Technical Aspects Provided technical aspect of choosing devices and media 5 Devices configurations Configuration provided in term of reports as text 5 Implementation & Demo Implement partially configuration on real equipment’s 10 Reference style Follow IEEE reference style 5 BN321 Advanced Network Design Page 3 of 4 Prepared by: Mr. Tarek Elwan Moderated by: Dr. Ghassan kbar Total 50 BN321 Advanced Network Design Page 4 of 4 Prepared by: Mr. Tarek Elwan Moderated by: Dr. Ghassan kbar Marking Rubric Grade Mark HD 40-50 DI 35-39 CR 30-34 P 25-29 Fail<25 excellent very good good satisfactory unsatisfactory task 1 requirements gathering /10 requirements gathered are concise and specific to the project requirements gathered are moderately concise and specific to the project requirements gathered are somehow relevant to the project. some relevance but not well presented. this is not relevant to the assignment topic. technique used for collecting requirements in task 1 /5 demonstrated excellent ability to think critically and relevant to assessment requirements demonstrated excellent ability to think critically but few material used is not relevant demonstrated good ability to think critically and relevant to assessment requirements demonstrated satisfactory ability to think critically and relevant to assessment requirements did not demonstrate ability to think critically and not relevant to assessment requirements task 2 network design and subnetting /10 network design logic is clear and easy to follow with strong arguments network design logic is clear but not clearly presented with arguments network design logic is moderately clear and easy to follow with strong arguments network design logic is not clear however some arguments are satisfactory network design logic is not clear and not presented appropriately task 2 devices technical aspects /5 full technical aspects with images some technical aspects with images some technical aspects with some images some technical aspects without images some technical or non-technical aspects with or without images task 2 devices configurations /5 full & accurate working configurations full & accurate working configuration with some minor errors some accurate working configurations without errors some accurate working configurations with error some non- accurate configurations and non-working demo /10 full professional demo – working no error s full professional demo – working - with minor errors full professional demo – partially working – some errors some average configuration – some working – with errors some or non- working -average configuration – some or non- working – with errors reference style /5 clear styles with excellent source of references. clear referencing style generally good referencing style sometimes clear referencing style lacks consistency with many errors excellent="" very="" good="" good="" satisfactory="" unsatisfactory="" task="" 1="" requirements="" gathering="" 10="" requirements="" gathered="" are="" concise="" and="" specific="" to="" the="" project="" requirements="" gathered="" are="" moderately="" concise="" and="" specific="" to="" the="" project="" requirements="" gathered="" are="" somehow="" relevant="" to="" the="" project.="" some="" relevance="" but="" not="" well="" presented.="" this="" is="" not="" relevant="" to="" the="" assignment="" topic.="" technique="" used="" for="" collecting="" requirements="" in="" task="" 1="" 5="" demonstrated="" excellent="" ability="" to="" think="" critically="" and="" relevant="" to="" assessment="" requirements="" demonstrated="" excellent="" ability="" to="" think="" critically="" but="" few="" material="" used="" is="" not="" relevant="" demonstrated="" good="" ability="" to="" think="" critically="" and="" relevant="" to="" assessment="" requirements="" demonstrated="" satisfactory="" ability="" to="" think="" critically="" and="" relevant="" to="" assessment="" requirements="" did="" not="" demonstrate="" ability="" to="" think="" critically="" and="" not="" relevant="" to="" assessment="" requirements="" task="" 2="" network="" design="" and="" subnetting="" 10="" network="" design="" logic="" is="" clear="" and="" easy="" to="" follow="" with="" strong="" arguments="" network="" design="" logic="" is="" clear="" but="" not="" clearly="" presented="" with="" arguments="" network="" design="" logic="" is="" moderately="" clear="" and="" easy="" to="" follow="" with="" strong="" arguments="" network="" design="" logic="" is="" not="" clear="" however="" some="" arguments="" are="" satisfactory="" network="" design="" logic="" is="" not="" clear="" and="" not="" presented="" appropriately="" task="" 2="" devices="" technical="" aspects="" 5="" full="" technical="" aspects="" with="" images="" some="" technical="" aspects="" with="" images="" some="" technical="" aspects="" with="" some="" images="" some="" technical="" aspects="" without="" images="" some="" technical="" or="" non-technical="" aspects="" with="" or="" without="" images="" task="" 2="" devices="" configurations="" 5="" full="" &="" accurate="" working="" configurations="" full="" &="" accurate="" working="" configuration="" with="" some="" minor="" errors="" some="" accurate="" working="" configurations="" without="" errors="" some="" accurate="" working="" configurations="" with="" error="" some="" non-="" accurate="" configurations="" and="" non-working="" demo="" 10="" full="" professional="" demo="" –="" working="" no="" error="" s="" full="" professional="" demo="" –="" working="" -="" with="" minor="" errors="" full="" professional="" demo="" –="" partially="" working="" –="" some="" errors="" some="" average="" configuration="" –="" some="" working="" –="" with="" errors="" some="" or="" non-="" working="" -average="" configuration="" –="" some="" or="" non-="" working="" –="" with="" errors="" reference="" style="" 5="" clear="" styles="" with="" excellent="" source="" of="" references.="" clear="" referencing="" style="" generally="" good="" referencing="" style="" sometimes="" clear="" referencing="" style="" lacks="" consistency="" with="" many="">25 excellent very good good satisfactory unsatisfactory task 1 requirements gathering /10 requirements gathered are concise and specific to the project requirements gathered are moderately concise and specific to the project requirements gathered are somehow relevant to the project. some relevance but not well presented. this is not relevant to the assignment topic. technique used for collecting requirements in task 1 /5 demonstrated excellent ability to think critically and relevant to assessment requirements demonstrated excellent ability to think critically but few material used is not relevant demonstrated good ability to think critically and relevant to assessment requirements demonstrated satisfactory ability to think critically and relevant to assessment requirements did not demonstrate ability to think critically and not relevant to assessment requirements task 2 network design and subnetting /10 network design logic is clear and easy to follow with strong arguments network design logic is clear but not clearly presented with arguments network design logic is moderately clear and easy to follow with strong arguments network design logic is not clear however some arguments are satisfactory network design logic is not clear and not presented appropriately task 2 devices technical aspects /5 full technical aspects with images some technical aspects with images some technical aspects with some images some technical aspects without images some technical or non-technical aspects with or without images task 2 devices configurations /5 full & accurate working configurations full & accurate working configuration with some minor errors some accurate working configurations without errors some accurate working configurations with error some non- accurate configurations and non-working demo /10 full professional demo – working no error s full professional demo – working - with minor errors full professional demo – partially working – some errors some average configuration – some working – with errors some or non- working -average configuration – some or non- working – with errors reference style /5 clear styles with excellent source of references. clear referencing style generally good referencing style sometimes clear referencing style lacks consistency with many errors>