Please help
Prepared by: Dr Sanjeeb Shrestha Moderated by: Dr Imran Jokhio May 2022 T1 2022 Assignment 2 Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines Unit Code BN321 Unit Title Advanced Network Design Assessment Type Group report (5 Students in a group at maximum) Assessment Title Network Requirement Analysis and Design Purpose of the assessment (with ULO Mapping) After successful completion of this assignment, students should be able to: a. Analyse the need for advanced networks, standards and network solutions; b. Analyse network design requirements; c. Develop appropriate frameworks and standards for network implementation; d. Apply concepts and theories of human factors as related to network design and implementation; e. Compare performance metrics and dimensions according to specifications Weight 25% of the total assessments Total Marks 50 Word limit 1200 - 1500 Due Date Week 11, 03/06/2022 (11:59 PM) Submission Guidelines All work must be submitted on Moodle by the due date along with a completed Assignment Cover Page. The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 11-pt Calibri (Body) font and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings. For demonstration video, the video must include the presenter. It is recommended (not mandatory) to have the video created using ZOOM app. Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using IEEE referencing style. Extension If an extension of time to submit work is required, a Special Consideration Application must be submitted directly to the School's Administration Officer, on academic reception level. You must submit this application within three working days of the assessment due date. Further information is available at: http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures- and-guidelines/specialconsiderationdeferment Academic Misconduct Academic Misconduct is a serious offence. Depending on the seriousness of the case, penalties can vary from a written warning or zero marks to exclusion from the course or rescinding the degree. Students should make themselves familiar with the full policy and procedure available at: http://www.mit.edu.au/about- mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism- Academic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure. For further information, please refer to the Academic Integrity Section in your Unit Description. http://www.mit.edu.au/about http://www.mit.edu.au/about http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure BN321 Advanced Network Design Page 2 of 4 Prepared by: Dr Sanjeeb Shrestha Moderated by: Dr Imran Jokhio May 2022 Assignment Description Background and Objective A consulting firm in Australia is expanding. You are hired as a network engineer to design and implement their IT infrastructure. Assume that the organisation intends to use the latest technology however, reasonable budget and expenditure are highly recommended. In a face-to face meeting with the top-level Management, you were able to receive only the general information about the organisation. The general information includes: the two office sites in Sydney and in Adelaide. Sydney site requires 50 employees while Adelaide site have 75 employees. Both the sites have Customer Services, Sales, Marketing, Finance and Management departments. A network design and implementation proposal are required. As a part of proposal, submit a report to address the following two tasks. Please note that this is a group assignment, and 5 students are allowed in a group at maximum. Task 1: In order to gather (user, application, and network requirements) different techniques i.e., Interviews and questionnaire are used. Create a questionnaire to get application requirements. The questionnaire must have at least 4 questions. Describe the purpose of each question and categorise the question whether it is focused to user, application or device requirements. Record possible answers to use in next task. Task 2: Based on the requirements identified at Task1, design a WAN structure of the business showing all devices such as routers, switches, links, etc., by using a relevant network designing software. Draw a diagram to illustrate your high-level design. Determine network addresses by using the subnet 192.168.P.0/24, where P is your group number. You also need to use Variable Length Subnet Mask (VLSM) technique whilst creating the subnets and allow 20% for possible future expansion. You need to explain the technical aspects for the choosing devices such routers, switches, hubs, cables, servers etc. Configure the topology devices with basic configurations, routing and NAT (Using Packet Tracer). Additional configuration such as VLAN and Port security etc. Task 3: Video demonstration (10 minutes at Max) The group is required to prepare a short 7–10-minute video covering the following aspects: overall implementation of the network routing configuration and VLAN configuration BN321 Advanced Network Design Page 3 of 4 Prepared by: Dr Sanjeeb Shrestha Moderated by: Dr Imran Jokhio May 2022 It is mandatory to have your avatar on the screen while describing your design. You may upload the video on the Moodle Shell or may have the link for the video. Marking criteria: Sections to be included in the report Description of the section Marks Task 1 Information Collection Requirements Gathering Requirements Gathering from for Users, Devices, Application and Network. 2.5+2.5+2.5+2.5=10 Technique used for collecting requirements in Task 1 Questionnaire its purpose and category. 5 Task 2 Design and Implementation Network Design & subnetting Include a diagram of your designed network, and write justifications of your design 5+5=10 Devices and Technical Aspects Provided technical aspect of choosing devices and media 5 Devices configurations Configuration provided in the report 5 Task 3 Video Demonstration Implementation Demonstration Video demonstration of the implementation of the network, routing and VLAN configuration 5+2.5+2.5=10 Reference style Follow IEEE reference style minimum credible 5 references 5 Total 50 BN321 Advanced Network Design Page 4 of 4 Prepared by: Dr Sanjeeb Shrestha Moderated by: Dr Imran Jokhio May 2022 Marking Rubric Grade Mark HD 40-50 DI 35-39 CR 30-34 P 25-29 Fail<25 excellent very good good satisfactory unsatisfactory task 1 requirements gathering /10 requirements gathered are concise and specific to the project requirements gathered are moderately concise and specific to the project requirements gathered are somehow relevant to the project. some relevance but not well presented. this is not relevant to the assignment topic. technique used for collecting requirements in task 1 /5 demonstrated excellent ability to think critically and relevant to assessment requirements demonstrated excellent ability to think critically but few material used is not relevant demonstrated good ability to think critically and relevant to assessment requirements demonstrated satisfactory ability to think critically and relevant to assessment requirements did not demonstrate ability to think critically and not relevant to assessment requirements task 2 network design and subnetting /10 network design logic is clear and easy to follow with strong arguments network design logic is clear but not clearly presented with arguments network design logic is moderately clear and easy to follow with strong arguments network design logic is not clear however some arguments are satisfactory network design logic is not clear and not presented appropriately task 2 devices technical aspects /5 full technical aspects with images some technical aspects with images some technical aspects with some images some technical aspects without images some technical or non-technical aspects with or without images task 2 devices configurations /5 full & accurate working configurations full & accurate working configuration with some minor errors some accurate working configurations without errors some accurate working configurations with error some non- accurate configurations and non-working demo /10 full professional demo – working no error s full professional demonstration working with minor errors full professional demo – partially working – some errors some average configuration – some working – with errors some or non- working -average configuration – some or non- working – with errors reference style /5 clear styles with excellent source of references. clear referencing style generally good referencing style sometimes clear referencing style lacks consistency with many errors excellent="" very="" good="" good="" satisfactory="" unsatisfactory="" task="" 1="" requirements="" gathering="" 10="" requirements="" gathered="" are="" concise="" and="" specific="" to="" the="" project="" requirements="" gathered="" are="" moderately="" concise="" and="" specific="" to="" the="" project="" requirements="" gathered="" are="" somehow="" relevant="" to="" the="" project.="" some="" relevance="" but="" not="" well="" presented.="" this="" is="" not="" relevant="" to="" the="" assignment="" topic.="" technique="" used="" for="" collecting="" requirements="" in="" task="" 1="" 5="" demonstrated="" excellent="" ability="" to="" think="" critically="" and="" relevant="" to="" assessment="" requirements="" demonstrated="" excellent="" ability="" to="" think="" critically="" but="" few="" material="" used="" is="" not="" relevant="" demonstrated="" good="" ability="" to="" think="" critically="" and="" relevant="" to="" assessment="" requirements="" demonstrated="" satisfactory="" ability="" to="" think="" critically="" and="" relevant="" to="" assessment="" requirements="" did="" not="" demonstrate="" ability="" to="" think="" critically="" and="" not="" relevant="" to="" assessment="" requirements="" task="" 2="" network="" design="" and="" subnetting="" 10="" network="" design="" logic="" is="" clear="" and="" easy="" to="" follow="" with="" strong="" arguments="" network="" design="" logic="" is="" clear="" but="" not="" clearly="" presented="" with="" arguments="" network="" design="" logic="" is="" moderately="" clear="" and="" easy="" to="" follow="" with="" strong="" arguments="" network="" design="" logic="" is="" not="" clear="" however="" some="" arguments="" are="" satisfactory="" network="" design="" logic="" is="" not="" clear="" and="" not="" presented="" appropriately="" task="" 2="" devices="" technical="" aspects="" 5="" full="" technical="" aspects="" with="" images="" some="" technical="" aspects="" with="" images="" some="" technical="" aspects="" with="" some="" images="" some="" technical="" aspects="" without="" images="" some="" technical="" or="" non-technical="" aspects="" with="" or="" without="" images="" task="" 2="" devices="" configurations="" 5="" full="" &="" accurate="" working="" configurations="" full="" &="" accurate="" working="" configuration="" with="" some="" minor="" errors="" some="" accurate="" working="" configurations="" without="" errors="" some="" accurate="" working="" configurations="" with="" error="" some="" non-="" accurate="" configurations="" and="" non-working="" demo="" 10="" full="" professional="" demo="" –="" working="" no="" error="" s="" full="" professional="" demonstration="" working="" with="" minor="" errors="" full="" professional="" demo="" –="" partially="" working="" –="" some="" errors="" some="" average="" configuration="" –="" some="" working="" –="" with="" errors="" some="" or="" non-="" working="" -average="" configuration="" –="" some="" or="" non-="" working="" –="" with="" errors="" reference="" style="" 5="" clear="" styles="" with="" excellent="" source="" of="" references.="" clear="" referencing="" style="" generally="" good="" referencing="" style="" sometimes="" clear="" referencing="" style="" lacks="" consistency="" with="" many="">25 excellent very good good satisfactory unsatisfactory task 1 requirements gathering /10 requirements gathered are concise and specific to the project requirements gathered are moderately concise and specific to the project requirements gathered are somehow relevant to the project. some relevance but not well presented. this is not relevant to the assignment topic. technique used for collecting requirements in task 1 /5 demonstrated excellent ability to think critically and relevant to assessment requirements demonstrated excellent ability to think critically but few material used is not relevant demonstrated good ability to think critically and relevant to assessment requirements demonstrated satisfactory ability to think critically and relevant to assessment requirements did not demonstrate ability to think critically and not relevant to assessment requirements task 2 network design and subnetting /10 network design logic is clear and easy to follow with strong arguments network design logic is clear but not clearly presented with arguments network design logic is moderately clear and easy to follow with strong arguments network design logic is not clear however some arguments are satisfactory network design logic is not clear and not presented appropriately task 2 devices technical aspects /5 full technical aspects with images some technical aspects with images some technical aspects with some images some technical aspects without images some technical or non-technical aspects with or without images task 2 devices configurations /5 full & accurate working configurations full & accurate working configuration with some minor errors some accurate working configurations without errors some accurate working configurations with error some non- accurate configurations and non-working demo /10 full professional demo – working no error s full professional demonstration working with minor errors full professional demo – partially working – some errors some average configuration – some working – with errors some or non- working -average configuration – some or non- working – with errors reference style /5 clear styles with excellent source of references. clear referencing style generally good referencing style sometimes clear referencing style lacks consistency with many errors>