Only part B
Prepared by: Dr Noor u Zaman Laghari Moderated by: Dr Saeid Iranmanesh March, 2020 T1 2020 Assignment 1 Details and Submission Guidelines Unit Code MN503 Unit Title Overview of Internetworking Assessment Type Individual Assessment Title Network requirement analysis and plan Purpose of the assessment (with ULO Mapping) This assignment is designed to assess students’ knowledge and skills related to the following learning outcomes: b. Explain human factors in achieving business and technical goals through planning and design. c. Investigate and develop an architectural internetworking design for the business and application domains. Weight Part A: 3% Part B: 7% 10% of the total assessments Total Marks 100 Word limit PARTA: Around 700 PARTB: Around 1300 Due Date PART A: T1, 2020 Week 3, 7th April 2020, 11:55 p.m. - submit a report on Moodle T1,PART B: T1, 2020 Week 7, 5th May 2020, 11:55 p.m. - submit a report on Moodle Submission Guidelines All work must be submitted on Moodle by the due date along with a Title Page. The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 11-pt Calibri (Body) font and 2.54 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings. Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using IEEE referencing style. Extension If an extension of time to submit work is required, a Special Consideration Application must be submitted directly on AMS. You must submit this application three working days before the due date of the assignment. Further information is available at: http://www.mit.edu.au/about-us/governance/institute-rules-policies- and-plans/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/assessment-policy Academic Misconduct Academic Misconduct is a serious offence. Depending on the seriousness of the case, penalties can vary from a written warning or zero marks to exclusion from the course or rescinding the degree. Students should make themselves familiar with the full policy and procedure available at http://www.mit.edu.au/about- mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism- Academic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure. For further information, please refer to the Academic Integrity Section in your Unit Description. http://www.mit.edu.au/about-us/governance/institute-rules-policies-and-plans/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/assessment-policy http://www.mit.edu.au/about-us/governance/institute-rules-policies-and-plans/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/assessment-policy http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure MN503 OVERVIEW OF INTERNETWORKING P a g e | 2 Prepared by: Dr Noor u Zaman Laghari Moderated by: Dr Saeid Iranmanesh March, 2020 Assignment 1 Overview of Internetworking MN503 A case study entitled “SUPPORTING A WIRELESS CAMPUS AND EDUCATION MISSION” is uploaded with the assignment 1 folder, and the link for the case study is provided in the appendix. Founded by King Henry VI in 1440, Eton College has been one of the leading independent schools in the U.K. throughout its history. No stranger to innovation, Eton is always looking forward to anticipate new learning demands. As Eton has moved from a completely wired network environment to primarily wireless connectivity, it relies on RivaNET and its Ruckus solutions to keep it at the forefront of education. REQUIREMENTS Deliver reliable wireless coverage in a variety of challenging environments Increase network capacity to support new cloud applications Enable students to use multiple devices on campus Support online and physical security measures While designing the wired and the wireless network for Eton college campus, please consider Eton College has the 400 Buildings, with all the major facilities and systems, including school-provided desktop computers, laptops, and audio-visual equipment which are connected over the core network. In the past three years, students have increasingly arrived at Eton with multiple devices, such as, at least a laptop, tablet, and smartphone, and they expect a robust wireless network. However, delivering high-quality Wi-Fi across many different environments on campus is challenging. Students and teaching staff need reliable connections in the boarding houses, because each boy has his own room, the number of rooms, walls, and doors make it difficult to deliver uniformly good coverage and high capacity. Based on your comprehension of the case study analyse the scenario and simulate the the proposed wired and wireless network solution for ETON COLEGE in CISCO packet tracer. The report on the proposed design must have the following contents. Introduction Project scope Challenges and constraints User-centric design concept Approach adopted for the network design Analysis of project hardware requirements Analysis of the network design Results Limitations and further design Conclusion Demonstration of the simulation model in CISCO packet tracer IEEE referencing style MN503 OVERVIEW OF INTERNETWORKING P a g e | 3 Prepared by: Dr Noor u Zaman Laghari Moderated by: Dr Saeid Iranmanesh March, 2020 Marking criteria: Example of marking criteria is shown in the following table. Marks are allocated as follows: Section needs to be included in the report Description of the section Marks P A R T - A Introduction Introduction of the project and overview of the report 5 Project Scope Outline of the project requirements discussing the overall Scope and boundaries of the project 5 Challenges Identify at least 3 challenges of the case study that needs to be addressed 5 User centric design concept The user centric design approach used in the case study and the additional improvements in terms of the user centric design 5 Approach adopted for the Network Design Explain what design approach you are going to choose and why. Further explain main steps involved in this approach in context of the project 5 References Follow IEEE style referencing 5 Sub Total 30 P A R T - B Feedback This section should include a snapshot of feedback (from Moodle) provided for the part A. Also include a summary of the actions taken by you to address the comments. 5 Project hardware requirements and analyses Name of the devices with manufacturer’s name, series, model, features and ports Types of cables or connections Name of the servers, Hosts (PCs, laptops, smartphones etc.) 10 Approach and model adopted for Network design Network design using a simulator software Justification of the approach and the concept (Execution of the simulation model is not required in this assignment) 15 Outcomes Identify at least 4 outcomes of the network 5 Limitations and further development Identify and 2 limitation of the project and your suggestion/s for future 5 Conclusions Write a clear conclusion of the case study 5 Reference style Follow IEEE style referencing 5 Demonstration Demonstration of your network design (Week 6 and 7) 20 Sub Total 70 Total 100 MN503 OVERVIEW OF INTERNETWORKING P a g e | 4 Prepared by: Dr Noor u Zaman Laghari Moderated by: Dr Saeid Iranmanesh March, 2020 Demonstration (20 Marks) Demonstration of your network design will be required in week-6 and week-7 lab with the following in focus (the day of your demonstration would be decided by your tutor). 1 Detail network design in a simulation software 12 2 List of equipment 3 3 Configurations and settings 3 4 Justification of the design 2 Total 20 Example Marking Rubric for Assignment #: Total Marks 50 Grades Excellent >80% Very Good [70%-80%) Good [60%- 70%) Satisfactory [50%-60%) Unsatisfactory< 50% introduction all the points are pertinent and covered in brief and provide good summary of the literature and activity performed in the assessment. mostly points are pertinent and covered in brief and provide good summary of the literature and activity performed in the assessment. many points are pertinent and covered in brief and provide summary of the literature and activity performed in the assessment. few point are pertinent and covered in brief and provide outline of the literature and activity performed in the assessment. many points are not pertinent and not clear and summary is not provided for the activity. project scope concise and specific to the project topics are relevant and soundly analysed generally relevant and analysed some relevance and briefly presented this is not relevant to the assignment topic challenges and constraints concise and specific to the project topics are relevant and soundly analysed generally relevant and analysed some relevance and briefly presented this is not relevant to the assignment topic user centric design concept concise and specific to the project topics are relevant and soundly analysed generally relevant and analysed some relevance and briefly presented this is not relevant to the assignment topic approach and model adopted for the network design 50%="" introduction="" all="" the="" points="" are="" pertinent="" and="" covered="" in="" brief="" and="" provide="" good="" summary="" of="" the="" literature="" and="" activity="" performed="" in="" the="" assessment.="" mostly="" points="" are="" pertinent="" and="" covered="" in="" brief="" and="" provide="" good="" summary="" of="" the="" literature="" and="" activity="" performed="" in="" the="" assessment.="" many="" points="" are="" pertinent="" and="" covered="" in="" brief="" and="" provide="" summary="" of="" the="" literature="" and="" activity="" performed="" in="" the="" assessment.="" few="" point="" are="" pertinent="" and="" covered="" in="" brief="" and="" provide="" outline="" of="" the="" literature="" and="" activity="" performed="" in="" the="" assessment.="" many="" points="" are="" not="" pertinent="" and="" not="" clear="" and="" summary="" is="" not="" provided="" for="" the="" activity.="" project="" scope="" concise="" and="" specific="" to="" the="" project="" topics="" are="" relevant="" and="" soundly="" analysed="" generally="" relevant="" and="" analysed="" some="" relevance="" and="" briefly="" presented="" this="" is="" not="" relevant="" to="" the="" assignment="" topic="" challenges="" and="" constraints="" concise="" and="" specific="" to="" the="" project="" topics="" are="" relevant="" and="" soundly="" analysed="" generally="" relevant="" and="" analysed="" some="" relevance="" and="" briefly="" presented="" this="" is="" not="" relevant="" to="" the="" assignment="" topic="" user="" centric="" design="" concept="" concise="" and="" specific="" to="" the="" project="" topics="" are="" relevant="" and="" soundly="" analysed="" generally="" relevant="" and="" analysed="" some="" relevance="" and="" briefly="" presented="" this="" is="" not="" relevant="" to="" the="" assignment="" topic="" approach="" and="" model="" adopted="" for="" the="" network="">