Please view attached files
Prepared by: Dr Noor u Zaman Laghari Moderated by: Dr Saeid Iranmanesh April 2020 Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines Unit Code MN503 Unit Title Overview of Internetworking Assessment Type Group (3 students in a Group) Assessment Title Network requirement analysis and plan Purpose of the assessment (with ULO Mapping) This assignment is designed to assess students’ knowledge and skills related to the following learning outcomes: d. Analyse and report on the current and future state of the internetworking infrastructure and its applications. e. Implement a process to support the administration and management of internetworking. Weight 30% of the total assessments Total Marks 70+30=100 Word limit 1500 -2000 (approximately 6-8 pages) Due Date 2nd, June 2020 Week 11 (Submit report on Moodle) Demonstration of the design and simulation model in week 11 during Lab. timings. Submission Guidelines • All work must be submitted on Moodle by the due date along with a title Page. • The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 11-pt Calibri (Body) font and 2.54 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings. • Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using IEEE referencing style. Extension • If an extension of time to submit work is required, a Special Consideration Application must be submitted directly to the School's Administration Officer, in Melbourne on Level 6 or in Sydney on Level 7. You must submit this application three working days prior to the due date of the assignment. Further information is available at: http://www.mit.edu.au/about-us/governance/institute-rules- policies-and-plans/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/assessment-policy Academic Misconduct • Academic Misconduct is a serious offence. Depending on the seriousness of the case, penalties can vary from a written warning or zero marks to exclusion from the course or rescinding the degree. Students should make themselves familiar with the full policy and procedure available at: https://www.mit.edu.au/about- mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and- guidelines/AcademicIntegrityPolicyAndProcedure. For further information, please refer to the Academic Integrity Section in your Unit Description. http://www.mit.edu.au/about-us/governance/institute-rules-policies-and-plans/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/assessment-policy http://www.mit.edu.au/about-us/governance/institute-rules-policies-and-plans/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/assessment-policy https://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/AcademicIntegrityPolicyAndProcedure https://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/AcademicIntegrityPolicyAndProcedure https://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/AcademicIntegrityPolicyAndProcedure MN503 Overview of Internetworking P a g e | 2 Prepared by: Dr Noor u Zaman Laghari Moderated by: Dr Saeid Iranmanesh April 2020 Assignment Description Project Scope: A typical network layout diagram of a higher education Institute is given as Figure-1 (for illustrative purposes only). The Institute has sections segregated as Melbourne and Sydney campuses connected through WAN. Within the campuses, we have laboratories and other office workstations segregated into School of IT and School of Business. The Network requirements are given as follows: 1. Two campuses have separate local area networks. Staff users from both campuses should be able to have access from/to both campuses. 2. There should be a clear restriction that any host from library should not be allowed to ping hosts from other offices. 3. Printing services should be available to all the schools’ users. 4. Wireless access is available to all the staff, student, and guest across both campuses. 5. Internet should be provided to all the sections (i.e. School of IT and School of business from both campuses). 6. IP network design is required. 7. Hardware requirements with costs specification (specification of all the hardware required, number of units and per unit cost). 8. Configuration details on the hardware (Routers, switches and workstations). Assignment requirements: As a group, you are required to analyse the project requirement and then design and simulate a network fulfilling the above mentioned requirement. You need to provide a fully functional simulation model for the network. The report should have a detailed explanation of the planning and designing of network. It is recommended that bullet points are included whenever necessary. The sections that you need to consider in you report are as follows: 1. Project Scope 2. Project requirements 3. Network design – Consider the human factor design concepts • This part should include LAN/WAN/WLAN details and protocols used. 4. IP addressing in a tabular form (include justification whenever necessary) Figure-1: Network layout of the Higher Education Institute MN503 Overview of Internetworking P a g e | 3 Prepared by: Dr Noor u Zaman Laghari Moderated by: Dr Saeid Iranmanesh April 2020 5. Network topology diagram and simulation (CISCO Packet tracer is mandatory) • Switch configuration • Router configuration • Access point and server configuration guidelines • Security configuration Student should show the demo of the network design in Week 11 lab. Work progress and consultation will be done during week 9 and 10. Demonstration marks will be awarded in regards to the stage of the completion of the design The format of the demonstration will be a) An individual demo, b) At least 3 viva voce questions related to the design, and c) Demo and viva voce duration 5 – 7 minutes (at max). The following is to be covered. • Demonstration of the network design simulation in CISCO Packet Tracer. Note to the lab tutor: As per the need, the lab tutor can allocate 15 minutes in Week 9 and Week 10 for work progression check and consultation. Marking criteria The following marking criteria will be followed for the assignment report. Section to be included in the report Description of the section Marks Introduction Introduction of the project and overview of the report 05 Project Scope The project Scope should be explained in a logical approach 05 Project requirements Identify the project’s functional and non-functional requirements 10 Network design Explain the network design approach considering human factor (user-centric design) and also include LAN/WAN/WLAN details and protocols used. 10 Design Analysis Provide an in-depth analysis of the proposed design and strongly justify and support your design 10 IP addresses table Write the table summarising IP address, subnet-netmask, IP and address classes with appropriate justification. 10 Network Topology Diagram This part includes host, switches, routers, DHCP, access points server configuration guidelines and security configurations. 10 Conclusion Write a clear and conclusive summary of the report 05 Reference Style Follow IEEE reference style 05 TOTAL 70 MN503 Overview of Internetworking P a g e | 4 Prepared by: Dr Noor u Zaman Laghari Moderated by: Dr Saeid Iranmanesh April 2020 Demonstration Marks Section to be included in the report Description of the section Marks Simulation Completeness All the elements are present requirement are met 20 Simulation execution Simulation(s) executes satisfactorily 05 Question Answers Student explains the design and complete process 05 Total 30 Assessment/marking Description Marks for the assignment 2 will be calculated as follows: Individual’s Total Marks= Report Marks + Individual’s demonstration marks Example of the marking rubric for the Assignment: Total marks 60. The details about the rubric are as follows: Grades HD 80% and above D 70 - 79% CR 60 - 69% P 50 - 59% Fail<50% introduction/05 all the points are pertinent and covered in brief and provide good summary of the literature and activity performed in the assessment. mostly points are pertinent and covered in brief and provide good summary of the literature and activity performed in the assessment. many points are pertinent and covered in brief and provide summary of the literature and activity performed in the assessment. few point are pertinent and covered in brief and provide outline of the literature and activity performed in the assessment. many points are not pertinent and not clear and summary is not provided for the activity. project scope/05 all topics are pertinent and covered in depth. ability to think critically and source material is demonstrated topics relevant and soundly analysed generally relevant and analysed some relevance and briefly presented not relevant to the assignment topic project requirements/10 demonstrated excellent ability to think critically and sourced reference material appropriately demonstrated excellent ability to think critically but did not source material appropriately demonstrated an average ability to think critically and sourced reference introduction/05="" all="" the="" points="" are="" pertinent="" and="" covered="" in="" brief="" and="" provide="" good="" summary="" of="" the="" literature="" and="" activity="" performed="" in="" the="" assessment.="" mostly="" points="" are="" pertinent="" and="" covered="" in="" brief="" and="" provide="" good="" summary="" of="" the="" literature="" and="" activity="" performed="" in="" the="" assessment.="" many="" points="" are="" pertinent="" and="" covered="" in="" brief="" and="" provide="" summary="" of="" the="" literature="" and="" activity="" performed="" in="" the="" assessment.="" few="" point="" are="" pertinent="" and="" covered="" in="" brief="" and="" provide="" outline="" of="" the="" literature="" and="" activity="" performed="" in="" the="" assessment.="" many="" points="" are="" not="" pertinent="" and="" not="" clear="" and="" summary="" is="" not="" provided="" for="" the="" activity.="" project="" scope/05="" all="" topics="" are="" pertinent="" and="" covered="" in="" depth.="" ability="" to="" think="" critically="" and="" source="" material="" is="" demonstrated="" topics="" relevant="" and="" soundly="" analysed="" generally="" relevant="" and="" analysed="" some="" relevance="" and="" briefly="" presented="" not="" relevant="" to="" the="" assignment="" topic="" project="" requirements/10="" demonstrated="" excellent="" ability="" to="" think="" critically="" and="" sourced="" reference="" material="" appropriately="" demonstrated="" excellent="" ability="" to="" think="" critically="" but="" did="" not="" source="" material="" appropriately="" demonstrated="" an="" average="" ability="" to="" think="" critically="" and="" sourced="">50% introduction/05 all the points are pertinent and covered in brief and provide good summary of the literature and activity performed in the assessment. mostly points are pertinent and covered in brief and provide good summary of the literature and activity performed in the assessment. many points are pertinent and covered in brief and provide summary of the literature and activity performed in the assessment. few point are pertinent and covered in brief and provide outline of the literature and activity performed in the assessment. many points are not pertinent and not clear and summary is not provided for the activity. project scope/05 all topics are pertinent and covered in depth. ability to think critically and source material is demonstrated topics relevant and soundly analysed generally relevant and analysed some relevance and briefly presented not relevant to the assignment topic project requirements/10 demonstrated excellent ability to think critically and sourced reference material appropriately demonstrated excellent ability to think critically but did not source material appropriately demonstrated an average ability to think critically and sourced reference>