Practice frameworks chosen:
7. Victorian public health and wellbeing outcomes framework (Department of Health).This framework provides a transparent approach to monitoring and reportingprogress in health services collective efforts to achieve health and wellbeing.
8. Guide to municipal public health and wellbeing planning (Department of Health). Thisframework is used by local government planners to develop their Municipal PublicHealth plans. It is an important framework for anyone planning to work within, or withlocal council in a health context.
IMPORTANT - Only answer this question:"4. Critique the frameworks against a core practice related value or principle (e.g. participation, empowerment, equity, resilience, motivation)" in 500 words
1 PHE3FPI Field Placement Assessment 4: Group Practice Framework Report (20%) Words: 500-word equivalent per student Submit by: 9am, 28 May (Thursday) (Week 11) Context When working in rehabilitation counselling, sports counselling and athlete welfare, health promotion or public health fields, it is important to both know about and understand the implications of critical practice frameworks. Firstly, funding is often dependent upon an ability to articulate how your program meets the requirements of practice frameworks. Secondly, work practice in the field is guided by such frameworks. And finally, practice frameworks allow for inter-disciplinary collaboration such as between clinicians and field workers (e.g., rehabilitation support workers and health promotion officers). Task Choose two practice frameworks from the list below. Or, you can choose other frameworks relevant to your discipline and that may be used in your potential placement sites. You can use international, national, regional and local frameworks (check with your Academic Supervisor that they are suitable). 1. Neami National Health Promotion Framework. This framework is used by Neami National in its commitment to doing what it can to improve the physical health outcomes of people with mental illness and integrates this commitment in all aspects of its work with consumers. 2. Framework for Recovery-Oriented Practice (Department of Health). This framework presents an invitation of the specialist mental health workforce to continue to develop and enhance practice in line with recovery principles. 3. Belonging, Being, and Becoming: The Early Years Learning Framework for Australia (Australian Government Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations). This framework was developed to assist educators to provide young children with opportunities to maximise their potential and develop a foundation for future success in learning. 4. My Time, Our Place: Framework for School Age Care in Australia (Australian Government Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations). This Intended Learning Outcome: Appraise critical practice frameworks relevant to field placement in a discipline-based setting. Learning activity: Investigate critical practice frameworks individually and collate in a written group report Intended output: Practice framework group report. 2 framework assists educators to provide children to develop a strong foundation for their future as they go through and leave school. 5. Aboriginal Cultural Standards Framework (Department of Education, WA). The framework supports all Department of Education staff to reflect on their approaches to the education of Aboriginal students. It sets expected standards for all staff when working with Aboriginal students, their families and communities. 6. Aboriginal Services and Practice Framework (Government of WA). This framework is designed to support and sustain the commitment of the WA government to improving outcomes for Aboriginal children, families and communities that come into contact with the child protection system. 7. Victorian public health and wellbeing outcomes framework (Department of Health). This framework provides a transparent approach to monitoring and reporting progress in health services collective efforts to achieve health and wellbeing. 8. Guide to municipal public health and wellbeing planning (Department of Health). This framework is used by local government planners to develop their Municipal Public Health plans. It is an important framework for anyone planning to work within, or with local council in a health context. 9. Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research. The code guides institutions and researchers in responsible research practices and promotes research integrity. 10. National Statement for on Ethical Conduct in Human Research. The National Statement consists of a series of guidelines made in accordance with the National Health and Medical Research Council Act 1992. 11. Aged Care Diversity Framework (Department of Health). The Diversity Framework seeks to embed diversity in the design and delivery of aged care; and support action to address perceived or actual barriers to consumers accessing safe, equitable and quality aged care, while enabling consumers and carers to be partners in this process. 12. National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Flexible Aged Care Program: Quality Framework (Department of Health and Ageing). This framework provides a set of quality standards and a process for monitoring achievements against these standards for services funded under the program. 13. Positive Practice Framework (Department of Human Services). The goal of this framework is to maximise quality of life and reduce behaviours of concern for people with a disability. 14. Practice Framework for Disability Services (Optia). This framework is designed to be a best-practice guide for Optia staff, grounded in organisational values, legislation, and evidence-based research. 3 This assignment requires you to: 1. Identify and briefly describe key concepts, principles, values and practices contained in each framework. 2. Analyse strengths and weaknesses within and between the two frameworks. 3. Explain how you might you use these frameworks in your potential placement site. For example, the Aged Care Diversity Framework will assist you to take a human rights-based approach to working with older people from diverse communities, and to work with other sectors to address barriers to accessing quality aged care services. 4. Critique the frameworks against a core practice related value or principle (e.g., participation, empowerment, equity, resilience, motivation). *Ideas need to be supported by evidence throughout the report. Suggested structure for the report 1. Title page (names, student ID’s, subject, date and facilitator) 2. Introduction 3. Body of report (subheadings and tables can be used here) 4. Conclusion 5. References 9. Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research. The code guides institutions and researchers in responsible research practices and promotes research integrity. 10. National Statement for on Ethical Conduct in Human Research. The National Statement consists of a series of guidelines made in accordance with the National Health and Medical Research Council Act 1992. 11. Aged Care Diversity Framework (Department of Health). The Diversity Framework seeks to embed diversity in the design and delivery of aged care; and support action to address perceived or actual barriers to consumers accessing safe, equitable and q... 12. National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Flexible Aged Care Program: Quality Framework (Department of Health and Ageing). This framework provides a set of quality standards and a process for monitoring achievements against these standards fo... 13. Positive Practice Framework (Department of Human Services). The goal of this framework is to maximise quality of life and reduce behaviours of concern for people with a disability. 14. Practice Framework for Disability Services (Optia). This framework is designed to be a best-practice guide for Optia staff, grounded in organisational values, legislation, and evidence-based research. FIELD PLACEMENT INDUCTION (PHE3FPI) 1 Assessment 4: Group Report - Critical Practice Framework Marking Guide (35%). Criteria A (80+) B (70-79) C (60-69) D (50-59) Fail >50 Introduction and conclusion (15 marks) 12-15 Introduction is succinct, cogent, and provides a clear statement of the purpose of the report. Key points to be covered in the report are succinctly outlined, providing a clear and well-defined structure for the report. Draws clear conclusions about the importance of practice frameworks. 10.5-11.5 The introduction is clear and presents a solid outline of the key points to be made in the report. An indication of the structure of the report is provided. Clear conclusions that tie together the key ideas of the report are provided. Conclusion is a concise summary of what the report contained. 9-10.5 The introduction provides a basic outline of the key points to be covered in the report. Provided a conclusion to the report and summary of basic issues. 7.5-8.5 A basic introduction and conclusion are provided but there is little indication of the purpose/intent of the report. An outline of the key points to be covered is less clear. Limited conclusions that draw together key ideas of the report. >7 Introduction is unclear and disconnected from the key ideas in the report. Conclusions does not reflect key points and findings of report a) Identify and briefly describe the key concepts, principles, values and practices contained in the two frameworks (5 marks) 4-5 A comprehensive list of key concepts, principles, values and practices in both frameworks are described in detail. 3.5 Most key concepts, principles, values, and practices in both frameworks are described. 3 Some description of the key concepts, principles, values, and practices contained in both frameworks are provided. 2.5 Limited description of the key concepts, principles, values, and practices contained in both frameworks are provided. Or, limited description of the key concepts, principles, values, and >2.5 Poor and inadequate description of the concepts, principles, values and practices in frameworks. FIELD PLACEMENT INDUCTION (PHE3FPI) 2 practices for one framework is provided. b) What are the strengths and weaknesses within and between the two frameworks? (20 marks) 16-20 Thoughtful critique with the