PowerPoint Presentation CRICOS 03171A 1 Assessment 1 Type:Individual assessment, A Report Word Limit XXXXXXXXXX% words, not including a cover page, reference and appendix Value:20% Due Date:Week 6,...

sujan


PowerPoint Presentation CRICOS 03171A 1 Assessment 1  Type:Individual assessment, A Report Word Limit - 2000 + - 10% words, not including a cover page, reference and appendix Value:20%   Due Date:Week 6, 5.00pm Friday 1 Case for the assignment Read the case a few times carefully. The Sydney Symphony Orchestra Report Structure Title page, Executive summary, Table of contents, Introduction Suitable headings and subheadings, Conclusions, Reference list (Harvard – Anglia style) Appendix. Use 12 pt Times New Roman or 11 pt Calibri fonts. Single line spacing.  Executive Summary The Executive Summary (approx. 60 words) Quick overview of the key outcomes of the analysis Introduction Approx. 200 words Purpose(s) of the report Importance of the purpose(s), background Main plan of analytical process Key outcome(s) of the report. Major Contents of the report 1. Macro environmental analysis - factors which are changing or impacting on the company and/or the industry– include some discussion as to what they mean for the company 2. Industry analysis •brief description of the life cycle stage of the industry •Porter’s 5 forces analysis – conclusion regarding attractiveness Major Contents of the report 3. Company analysis: resources and capabilities – core competencies – include some discussion of which ones are/will be most effective in achieving strategies and objectives or are most important to identified environmental factors – macro and/or industry. VRIO Framework. 4. Competitor analysis: Conduct the market commonality and the resources similarity Analysis. Discuss the competitors’ future objectives, current strategies, assumptions and capabilities. Major Contents of the report 5. Strategy analysis Identify strategies - Business level Analyse if working or not – why / why not Suggestions for improving current strategies or suggestions for new strategies – link back to analysis and explain why you think they will work Conclusion Summary of the analyses of factors Weigh up key arguments and counter-arguments and Reconcile them with rebuttal Incremental Assignments ( recommendation only) This assessment can be submitted to the tutor in four (4) stages. StageMajor Contents TaskDueSubmission Form 11 and 2Week 3Hard copy to tutor 23, 4 and 5Week 4Hard copy to tutor 36 and 7Week 5Hard copy to tutor 4AllWeek 6Soft copy Upload on Moodle Incremental Assignments Before the start of your weeks 3, 4 and5 tutorials, you can print and bring to the class a copy of the work you have written in the expected report style structure. Students can not use the available tutorial time to go out and print the files. Incremental Assignments Your tutor will provide feedback for your work and sign off each week on it. This submission approach is designed to increase the support which students receive and help them achieve a good outcome. Final Submission (compulsory) Upload a soft copy into Turnitin on Moodle Word file: .doc / .docx Do not use Apple Mac file or Image file type   Research requirements Students need to support their analysis with references. Reference Requirements: Minimum of eight(8) suitable, reliable, current and academically acceptable sources – check with your tutor if unsure of the validity of sources. Students seeking Credit or above grades should support their analysis with increased number of reference sources comparable to the grade they are seeking.   Difference Between a Bibliography & a Reference list. Bibliography- A bibliography includes details of all the resources you used to produce your assignment, including those you did not quote or paraphrase. Reference - Each reference cited in-text must appear in the reference list, and each entry in the reference list must be cited in-text.  Presentation of the report Do Not Use Fancy images, Coloured letters Water marks Different font size/ font style Your name and number on the every page ‘Body’ as a heading Any images without reference Marking Guide Analysis 30% Research – extent and application30% Recommendations/conclusions20% Presentation 20% This mark will be scaled to a mark out of 20. See the SO for the Marking Rubric Turnitin - Similarity Report What % is acceptable?   Turnitin - Similarity Report Similarity percentage is not same as a percentage of the assessment has been plagiarised   KOI plagiarism Guide L1 - Level 1 Minor Academic Misconduct (if say less than 10% of the assessment has plagiarism) – this would justify a few nominal marks deduction for the question   L2 - Level 2 Moderate Academic Misconduct (if say between 10% and 25% of the assessment has plagiarism) – this would justify more marks deducted for the question   KOI plagiarism Guide DANGEROUS Level L3 - Level 3 Major Academic Misconduct (if say more than 25% of the assessment has been plagiarised) – this would justify a zero mark for the question   Contract Cheating Contract cheating is where a student commissions - either paid or unpaid - that is offering its services to produce academic work on the student's behalf. These days, there are many online contract cheating sites that try to attract students to behave dishonestly. It is academic misconduct. Such an incident will be treated very seriously at KOI. CAUTION The slides are designed to help the students to start their work. Do not limit your work in the guide. ( Limiting your research will limit your performance)