Post your final individual paper. Minimum 6 to maximum 10 pagesin length (double spaced)not including end notes and references. You need to do a Works Cited or Reference Page for your final paper...

Last Name:    9
Name:
Professor:
Course:
Date:
Title: Abortion Law in Georgia
Contents
Introduction    3
Discussion and Arguments    3
The Humanitarian Aspect    3
Context of Global Population    4
Liberty of Women    5
Aspect of Health Hazards of Pregnant Women    6
Conclusion    7
Work Cited    9
Introduction
    The medical and social practice of abortion has catered more significance with the unprecedented population increase on the planet and it has divided the perspective of the society in two sections. The one is favoring abortion as a means of expressing women liberty and controlling measure on population, while the other sees abortion as a means of sophisticated infanticide, which needs to be checked for the morale improvement of the human society.
In order to check the conflicts surrounding abortion, government norms have been enforced in all countries, however, the changes in norms have raised waves of discussion for and against the norms on abortion and its nature. In the given study the recent changes made in law in Georgia State in United States of America has been discussed critically.
Discussion and Arguments
The Humanitarian Aspect
    The fetal heartbeat bill passed in Georgia in May 2019 can be seen as a humanitarian act. As stated by Ely et al., majority of the laws developed for the regulation of abortion aim commonly at saving lives of child, giving them the right to live freely and deciding the course of their lives instead of being on the mercy of their parents. Many of them are either negligent or reluctant to nurture life, putting forward their own comforts over the life of the unborn child.
Enforcing strict laws would save lives and the children will be born, ethically attaining their right to live. In order to counter the raised concern over increasing number children in the society, the government provides free healthcare for children, early life support, nutrition and immunity development programs as well as education for future. These reduce the responsibilities of the parents to a considerable degree in terms of the expenditure involved with the upbringing of the child, therefore, making the provisions that hinder abortion is well justified.
    Despite the seemingly justification for the imposing of the abortion laws in Georgia, it has to be considered that a major section of the abortions are done on women under the age of 18, making the situation problematic. As mentioned by Marseille et al., teenage pregnancy is evident in USA and the symptoms of pregnancy are not realized by most of the pregnant under aged women before the physical changes tend to appear, which takes nearly 8 to 12 weeks. Restricting the abortion after six weeks, as per the fetal heartbeat bill, the scope for safeguarding the lives of young women will be difficult.
Therefore, the bill cannot be supported rationally, even from a humanitarian aspect. The restriction on abortion could also lead to psychological impact on women, as the body undergoes changes during pregnancy and often lead to health issues post the childbirth, which from a humanitarian aspect cannot support the fetal heartbeat bill. It is also worth the mention that women with multiple childbirth would also lead to health issues, which with a more moderate law for abortion could have been attained.
Context of Global Population
    Although the global...