UNCC300 Assessment 2 opinion editorial Description: Choose one of the issues listed below and write a 700 words opinion editorial that critically analyses the challenges with realising aspirations of...

Plz be strictly mindful of similarity and required to get over 50% compulsory to pass this unit, thanks.


UNCC300 Assessment 2 opinion editorial Description: Choose one of the issues listed below and write a 700 words opinion editorial that critically analyses the challenges with realising aspirations of the common good in your professional community, locally and globally. · Patient access to prohibitively expensive treatments · Patient confidentiality (breaches) · Discrimination in the workplace · Discrimination in education (access and equity) · Fraud (financial/business contexts) · Abuse of privacy (social media, IT organisations) · The “Digital Divide” · Asylum seekers (and detention/incarceration) · Poverty and homelessness · Slavery (and human trafficking) · Assesment-3 Essay Description Extending your work from Assignment 2, write a 1200 word paper that briefly critiques a global issue (i.e., the issue or challenge you chose for Assessment 2) where shared responsibility for the common good is not being realised (approx. 300 words) and then, propose ways to address this challenge (approx.. 900 words) in your professional community, locally and globally. (NB: Emphasis is on your proposed ways to address the challenge because some of the critique will have been covered in Assignment 2). Please Note: In order to achieve a higher grade you will need to demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the Common Good and its relationship to other CST principles, particularly Human Dignity. Your discussion should demonstrate how Advocacy and Community Engagement may contribute to your proposed solution. Due date: Weighting: Length and/or format: 4 June 4am 50% 1200 words. Purpose: To demonstrate your ability to apply your knowledge and understanding of principles of human dignity, advocacy, and community engagement to potential ways to address the challenge of realising the common good in a global context. Reference: APA Required to get over 50% marks each in assignments to pass this unit UNCC300 Assessment Task 2 – Op Ed HD 85-100 Di 75-84 Cr 65-74 Pa 50-64 NN 0-49 Critical Analysis (26 marks) Provides a highly distinctive critical analysis of the chosen issue and the challenges with realising aspirations of the common good in their professional community, locally and globally. Provides a distinctive critical analysis of the chosen issue and the challenges with realising aspirations of the common good in their professional community, locally and globally. Provides a creditable critical analysis of the chosen issue and the challenges with realising aspirations of the common good in their professional community, locally and globally. Provides a satisfactory critical analysis of the chosen issue and the challenges with realising aspirations of the common good in their professional community, locally and globally. Fails to provide a satisfactory critical analysis of the chosen issue and the challenges with realising aspirations of the common good in their professional community, locally and globally. HD DI CR PA NN Style and Writing Mechanics (2 marks) F=0 P=1 C=1.3 D= 1.5 HD=2.0 Presents information in a very clear, coherent and highly engaging style. No errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling. Presents information in a very clear, coherent engaging style. Few or no errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling. Presents information in a clear, coherent engaging style. Few errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling. Presents information in a satisfactory style. Some errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling. Presents information in an unsatisfactory style. Many errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling. Referencing (2 marks) F=0 P=1 C=1.3 D= 1.5 HD=2.0 Exemplary citation of all sources of information to support the credibility and authority of the information presented. Very good referencing throughout; sources cited accurately and correctly. Provides accurate and full information about sources used. Good referencing throughout; sources cited accurately throughout. Provides accurate and sufficient information about sources used. Satisfactory referencing, in general; sources cited accurately, in general. Provides sufficient information about sources used. No referencing or numerous sources not cited accurately. Does not provide sufficient information about sources used.