Please write this for me, it is late
comm 333. communication and technology comm 333. communication and technology The Exam on Technological Determinism on September 23 (Essay 150 pts + Peer Reviews 20 pts + Points Received from Peers 30 pts) · Length: 1,000 word-essay that includes multiple citations (References are not counted.) : Two 150-word peer reviews · Paper Format: Typed in black, 12-point, Times New Roman font, double-spaced, with one-inch margins, & APA citation style (see only in-text citation & reference; Refer to the online source at https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/) · Due Date: Upload your essay to the Blackboard by 9am on September 23. * For blind peer review, it should NOT have any personal details such as your name or any other identity markers in the essay. Then you will receive two essays of your peers from the instructor through email at 2:30pm on September 23. : Upload your file that has two peer reviews to the Blackboard by 3:45pm on September 23. Objective: The purpose of this exam is for you to explore a topic of your choice as a way of understanding the relationship between technology and society by applying the perspective of technological determinism. Essay-writing Procedure: 1. Choose a topic of your interest and genre (e.g., argumentative speech, personal reflection-style essay, blog or any other social media post, a letter to friend, family member, future employer, business partner or celebrity, etc.) by which you can demonstrate your in-depth understanding of the perspective of technological determinism. 2. When you select a topic, consider that your essay must have 4 direct or indirect citations out of 4 different sources we have covered so far. You have the six scholars (Innis, McLuhan, Postman, Turkle, Manovich, & Krasmann) and the three viewing materials (2 episodes form Black Mirror and the documentary of The Great Hack) as the candidates to cite from. One citation can include 1 to 3 sentences. You can have 6 citations from the class materials if needed. This requirement is to encourage you to engage the class materials more actively. 3. Think about what the core message (e.g., claim, lesson, suggestion, etc.) of your essay will be. You should be able to express your message in one sentence. This message should be presented in the title as well as in the beginning and the end of your essay as well. 4. Collect and organize details (e.g., your thought, facts, cited ideas or claims) to back up your message. Feel free to cite any other credible source or incorporate an image in relation to the topic of your choice if you find it helpful. 5. Before submission to the Blackboard, make sure that your essay has title, body, & references without any personal information like name. Upload it by 9am on September 23. Peer Review Procedure: 1. Find the two essays of peers emailed by Dr. Choi at 2:30pm on September 23. 2. Read them carefully and think about what points and comments you’ll give to the peers according to the following criteria. · Key points to consider when you give grade: · Core Message (clarity, interesting, original, etc.): x out of 5 pts · Details to back up the message (specific, well-connected to message, etc.): y out of 7 pts · Mechanics (spelling, format, grammar): z out of 3 pts · Key points to consider when you offer a comment: · Strengths of the essay · Weaknesses of the essay 3. Fill out the following form and submit it to the Blackboard by 3:45pm on September 23. · You will receive 10 pts per each review (20 pts out of two reviews) as long as you fill out the following form as required and submit it within the given exam time. #1 Essay I reviewed Title: Grade (x out of 15 pts): Comment (150 words at least): #2 Essay I reviewed Title: Grade (x out of 15 pts): Comment (150 words at least): 4. Your grade and comment will be delivered to your peers along with the one of Dr. Choi. Evaluation: Your essay will be evaluated by the instructor based on the following rubric: Grading Rubric for Essay (150 pts) Advanced Developing Basic Below Basic Message (35 pts) (31-35 pts) - Message in the form of claim, lesson, or suggestion is clearly formed and presented both in the title and the essay. · The content of the message is relevant to understanding the perspective of technological determinism. (23-30 pts) · Message is recognizable and expressed both in the title and the essay. · Message’s connection to understanding the perspective of technological determinism is vague. (15-22 pts) - Message itself is under-developed - Title made (0-14 pts) - Message is not developed at all or unrecognizable. - No title Details to back up the message (55 pts) (49-55 pts) - Interesting, original, or relevant details are well-organized to support a chosen message - Presented details are accurate, specific, and persuasive to understand the message. (39-48 pts) · Some of presented details are interesting and original, but their relevancy or connection in supporting a chosen message is limited or questionable. (25-38 pts) · Presented details are inaccurate, unclear, or less developed in supporting a chosen message in general. (0-24 pts) · Scarce details are presented to back up a chosen message. · The relevancy of the presented details is very difficult to understand. Four Citations (30 pts) (27-30 pts) -All of four citations are created and incorporated into the flow and content of the essay very well. (23-26 pts) Some citations out of four align with the flow and content of the essay well. (18-22 pts) - Four citations are created correctly, but they’re vaguely connected to the flow and content of the essay. (0-17pts) - Not all of four citations are made. - Citations are incorrect or unrecognizable. Mechanics (30 pts) (17-30 pts) No or minor issue in spelling, punctuation, grammar, and APA citation style (14-16 pts) Some issues in spelling, punctuation, grammar, and APA citation style (0-13pts) Constant issues in spelling, punctuation, grammar, and APA citation style 1