please write the essay after reading the peer reviewed journal article given there of 1500 words on APA referencing with providing the plagiarism report.No any similarity to others as it cause serious offence. thanks
21670 MGMT11109 Introduction to Business Assessment task 2 – Written Assessment Assessment details for all students MGMT11109 1 Term 2, 2018 Assessment task 2 – Written Assessment Due date: 4:00PM AEST, Thursday 6 September 2018 (Week 8) ASSESSMENT Weighting: 40% 2 Length: Academic Essay (length 1500 words) Submission: Group or Individual Assessment: Online via Moodle Individual Objectives This assessment task relates to course learning outcomes numbers 3, 4 and 5. 3. Critically assess the factors that influence business environment 4. Evaluate the complex role of globalisation 5. Analyse the roles of ethics and social responsibility in the business environment. Before starting this assessment read the information and marking criteria set out below. Please also review the rubric for this assessment which is downloadable from the Moodle site. Purpose The purpose of this assessment item is to assess a students’ ability to formulate an Academic Essay that demonstrates a student’s critical thinking and communication skills. Students are required to read the following peer reviewed journal articles and be able to demonstrate critical thinking and to communicate this thinking in an appropriate communication style. Other graduate attributes such as problem solving, information literacy and information technology competence, cross cultural competence and ethical practice will be assessed at an introductory level by this assessment. Description The purpose of this assessment item is to assess the student's ability to formulate an essay that demonstrates the student’s critical thinking and communication skills. Students are required to find, then read the following peer reviewed journal article. Chun, J. S., Shin, Y., Choi, J.N., & Kim, M.S. (2013). How does corporate ethics contribute to firm financial performance? Journal of Management, 39(4), 853-877. doi:10.1177/0149206311419662 MGMT11109 Introduction to Business Assessment task 2 – Written Assessment Assessment details for all students MGMT11109 2 Term 2, 2018 Students are then asked to write a 1500 word Academic Essay answering the following topic question “Do you believe that the peer reviewed scholarly literature from 2012 to 2018 supports the use of ethics and social responsibility by global businesses in the current global business environment?" Students are expected to demonstrate the critical thinking skills they have developed in tutorial (Zoom sessions for Distance students) to assess evidence and put forward an argument regarding the use of ethics and social responsibility in the global business environment. This assessment will develop the use of critical thinking by the student. Students will further demonstrate critical thinking and information literacy skills by including six peer reviewed scholarly journals to support their argument to pass this criteria in their 'Reference List'. Please fully review the rubric for this assessment before starting on your Assessment. Students will demonstrate their communication skills by using the third person passive writing style. Students will be asked on this occasion not to use diagrams/pictures in their Academic Essay. This will give further opportunity to demonstrate intermediate communication written skills. MGMT11109 Introduction to Business Assessment task 2 – Written Assessment Assessment details for all students MGMT11109 3 Term 2, 2018 Assessment task 2 – Marking Criteria for Academic Essay (40%) Your submission will be assessed on the extent to which it meets each of the following criteria: CONTENT: Does your submission demonstrate: Total Marks available 1. Evidence of student critical thinking applied to the global business environment. 10.0 2. Evidence of student critical thinking in arguing for or against an ethical position concerning the social responsibility of modern business managers. 10.0 3. Six (6) peer reviewed scholarly journal articles are to be referenced in-text to pass this criteria. 5.0 PRESENTATION: Does your presentation demonstrate: 4. Use of written communication skills including choices made regarding appropriate structure to essay (introduction, body, conclusion) and use of formal tone, length (approx. 1500 words), word choice, expression, grammar, punctuation and correct spelling using Australian English. 10.0 5. Strict conformity to the exact requirements of the CQU APA Referencing Guide (in-text References are to be used throughout, as appropriate, and a reference list must be provided). 5.0 Total marks 40.0 Peer reviewed scholarly journal articles – This definition includes journal titles that are recognised at Ulrichsweb.com as both peer reviewed and peer refereed. The preferred peer reviewed scholarly journals that students should use are those identified and located at the Library Management Guide MGMT11109 Introduction to Business Assessment task 2 – Written Assessment Assessment details for all students MGMT11109 4 Term 2, 2018 Referencing Your Academic Essay needs to be at least 1500 words and be referenced using the CQU American Psychological Association (APA) abridged guide Term 1 2018 Referencing Style Guide. Do not reference Wikipedia/Investopedia sites for this or any other assessment in this Unit. Wikipedia sites are not considered a worthy source as the authorship of this information is not clear. Submission Submission of your assessment is online through moodle. Please see the left hand side of the moodle page for MGMT11109 Introduction to Business in the ASSESSMENT block. Please click on the relevant assessment and moodle will guide you through the submission process. Please be aware that your assessment will be called “Assessment Task Two” in the Assessment block on the left of the moodle site. If you have any problems submitting your assessment then please contact the Information Technology Directorate on any of the following channels. Term 1 & Term 2: Weeks 1-12: Monday-Thursday: 7:30am – 9pm Friday: 7:30am – 7pm Saturday: 10am - 3pm Sunday: 12pm - 3pm Break and Vacation weeks: Monday-Friday: 7:30am-6pm Saturday : CLOSED Sunday: CLOSED Email:
[email protected] Phone: 07 4930 9090 Toll Free: 1300 666 620 International: 61 7 4930 9090 Fax: 07 4930 9254 MGMT11109 Introduction to Business Assessment task 2 – Written Assessment Assessment details for all students MGMT11109 5 Term 2, 2018 Information to have ready - When contacting TaSAC, please provide as much detail as possible describing your situation: Your full name Student number Contact details including a telephone number and email address A description of the issue and any error messages that are displayed Where possible, students and staff are encouraged to attach a screen shot. Marking Rubric Unit code and name: MGMT11109 Introduction to Business Assessment type: Assessment Task 2 Academic Essay – Weighting (40%) Key Criteria Below Expectations (Fail) 0% = Non Submit Below Expectations (Fail) 1-29% Unsatisfactory Below Expectations (Fail) 30-49% Poor Meets Expectations (Pass) 50 – 64% Pass Meets Expectations (Credit) 65 – 74% Fair Exceeds Expectations (Distinction) 75 - 84% Good Exceeds Expectations (High Distinction) 85-100% Excellent Evidence of student critical thinking applied to the global business environment. Non-submit No core concepts demonstrated from Unit materials presented. The assessment fails to provide any clear evidence of the ideas presented from the Unit coursework; drawing no clear conclusions. The assessment provides limited detail with no clear summary of the ideas presented from the Unit coursework; drawing limited conclusions. The assessment presents a somewhat detailed and focused summary of the ideas presented from the Unit coursework; providing some evidence of conclusions. The assessment presents a fairly detailed and focused summary of the ideas presented from the Unit coursework; drawing fairly clear and well thought-out conclusions. The assessment presents a detailed and focused summary of the ideas presented from the Unit coursework; drawing clear and well thought-out conclusions. Student achievement /10 Evidence of student critical thinking in arguing for or against an ethical position concerning the social responsibility of modern business managers. Non-submit There is little, if any, coherent structure to the document. Limited structure and no insights and very limited critical analysis present. The ideas appear less logical, structured and presents in fairly incoherent manner. No ethical position or analysis argued. Limited understanding of social responsibility demonstrated. The ideas are arranged in a logical, some-what structured and coherent manner. Arguments are considered and show critical analysis but are not always backed up by evidence. The ideas are arranged in a fairly logical, structured and coherent manner. Arguments contain evidence. Alternative views have been considered. The ideas are arranged in an extremely logical, structured and coherent manner. Arguments contain compelling evidence. Alternative views contain compelling evidence. Student achievement /10 Key Criteria Below Expectations (Fail) 0% = Non Submit Below Expectations (Fail) 1-29% Unsatisfactory Below Expectations (Fail) 30-49% Poor Meets Expectations (Pass) 50 – 64% Pass Meets Expectations (Credit) 65 – 74% Fair Exceeds Expectations (Distinction) 75 - 84% Good Exceeds Expectations (High Distinction) 85-100% Excellent Six (6) peer reviewed scholarly