Please submit it in 24 hours, I have my submission, My professor is very strict, please ensure that you are following the assignment format and ensure that no AI is used and its non plagiarised

1 answer below »
Please submit it in 24 hours, I have my submission, My professor is very strict, please ensure that you are following the assignment format and ensure that no AI is used and its non plagiarised


COU306A_Assessment 3_20240603 Page 1 Assessment Brief Program Bachelor of Applied Social Science Subject Narrative Therapy Subject code COU306A Name of assessment Assessment 3: Narrative Therapy Report Length 2,500 words Learning outcomes addressed by this assessment: B, C, D Submission Date: End of week 11, Sunday 11:55pm Assessment brief summary: In this assignment, students will reflect on the elective and select a particular narrative practice, concept or skill that caught their imagination or had special significance for them. They are then to thoroughly explore this through a narrative lens. Total marks 50 Weighting 50% Students are advised that any submissions past the due date incur a 10% penalty per day, calculated from the total mark e.g. a task marked out of 40 will incur a 4 mark penalty per day. Students must attempt all tasks in the unit to be eligible to pass the unit More information can be found in Think Education Assessment Policy document on the Think Education website (http://www.think.edu.au). http://www.think.edu.au/ COU306A_Assessment 3_20240603 Page 1 COU306A_Assessment 3_20240603 Page 2 Assessment Description: In this 2,500 word assignment, students will reflect on the elective and select a particular narrative practice, concept or skill that caught their imagination or had special significance for them. They are then to thoroughly explore this through a narrative lens. Questions students are to answer will include but are not limited to: • How come this caught you imagination? • What personal experiences do you connect with this? • How does it contrast with other ways of thinking or doing things that you have been familiar with? • What discourses are involved in this approach and in contrasting approaches? • How might this new idea or practice shape you personally? • And in your practice as a therapist? • What hopes do you have for your clients as a result of knowing this? • How might you develop or stay close to these new ideas or practices? • How does it connect with other narrative practices and principles? • What values are expressed in this and how does it relate to your own values and visions? Students can refer to some of the handouts and their own notes about narrative questions for guidance in completing this assignment. There should be a balance of personal, subjective reflection and theoretical discussion. Proper referencing is required. Marking Criteria: Max. in category Your points Answering the question and responding to the topic 30 Links to theories and concepts 10 Number and choice of appropriate references 4 Word count, readability, and structure 3 In-text references and reference list, accuracy and use of correct referencing style 3 Total: 50 Comments: COU306A_Assessment 3_20240603 Page 3 What we want to see: The work must be fully referenced with in-text citations and a reference list at the end. We recommend you work with your Academic Writing Guide to ensure that you reference correctly. You will find a link to this document on the main page of every unit, under the 'Assessments' section. Correct academic writing and referencing are essential tasks that you need to learn. We recommend a minimum of six references. Referencing: References are assessed for their quality. You should draw on quality academic sources, such as books, chapters from edited books, journals etc. Your textbook can be used as a reference, but not the Study Guide and lecture notes. We want to see evidence that you are capable of conducting your own research. Also, in order to help markers determine students’ understanding of the work they cite, all in-text references (not just direct quotes) must include the specific page number/s if shown in the original. Researching: You can search for peer-reviewed journal articles, which you can find in the online journal databases and which can be accessed from the library homepage. Reputable news sites such as The Conversation (https://theconversation.com/au/health), online dictionaries and online encyclopedias are acceptable as a starting point to gain knowledge about a topic. Government departments, research institutes such as the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), international organisations such as the World Health Organisation (WHO) and local not for profit organisations such as the Cancer Council are also good resources. Formatting: The assessment MUST be submitted electronically in Microsoft Word format. Other formats may not be readable by markers. Please be aware that any assessments submitted in other formats will be considered LATE and will lose marks until it is presented in Word. What we don’t want to see: Plagiarism: All sources of information need to properly be acknowledged. Please refer to the plagiarism website on blackboardi. By clicking the 'Upload this file' button you acknowledge that you have read, understood and can confirm that the work you are about to submit complies with the Flexible and Online plagiarism policy as shown in the JNI Student Handbook. Like other forms of cheating plagiarism is treated seriously. Plagiarising students will be referred to the Program Manager. Word Count: Marks will be deducted for failure to adhere to the word count – as a general rule you may go over or under by 10% than the stated length. Late Submissions: Students are advised that any submissions past the due date incur a 10% penalty per day, calculated from the total mark e.g. a task marked out of 30 will incur 3 marks penalty per day. No submission: Students must attempt all tasks to be eligible to pass the unit. More information can be found in Think Education Assessment Policy document on the Think Education website. COU306A_Assessment 3_20240603 Page 4 Resources Available to YOU: 1. Academic writing guide link https://laureate- au.blackboard.com/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_20163_1&c ontent_id=_2498847_1&mode=reset 2. Writing & referencing: The link to the Learning and Academic Skills Unit (LASU) is on the left pulldown menu on the blackboard home page: https://laureate- au.blackboard.com/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_20163_1&c ontent_id=_2498847_1&mode=reset LASU also provides a series of academic skills tutorials. Please contact Caroline Spaans ([email protected], 02 949 232 14). 3. Researching: A guide to researching is available on the library page http://library.think.edu.au/research_skills/. Please contact the online and Pyrmont librarian for Health, Dawn Vaux ([email protected]) if you would like further help or a tutorial on how to do research this way. i https://laureate‐ au.blackboard.com/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_20163_1&content_id=_2498858_1&mode=reset mailto:([email protected] http://library.think.edu.au/research_skills/ mailto:([email protected]
Answered Same DayAug 16, 2024

Answer To: Please submit it in 24 hours, I have my submission, My professor is very strict, please ensure that...

Dipali answered on Aug 17 2024
3 Votes
WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT        2
WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT
Table of contents
Introduction    3
This practice is going to catch my imagination due to the following reasons:    3
Personal Connection with the Practice    4
Contrasting with Other Therapeutic Approaches    4
Discourses Involved in Externalization and Contrasting Approaches    5
Personal and Professional Impact of This Practice    6
Hopes for Clients    7
Staying Close to Narrative Practices    8
Connection with Other Narrative Practices and Principles    8
Values Expressed in
Externalizing the Problem    9
Conclusion    10
References    12
Introduction
Fundamentally based on postmodern principles, the Narrative Therapy reflects the ideas of postmodernists paying particular attention to the purposes of stories in forming the reality, identity, and relationships. It exhibits that what we consider our existence’s story strongly determines how we perceive existence. It focuses on the mental scripts, which are the ways people tell their life stories; it aims at helping to change these narratives and give the persons another way of looking at their lives. In this report I will focus on practice of selected by me narrative and which I personally found very inspiring – Externalizing the Problem. This practice, which entails decontextualisation of the individual from his or her problems or difficulties, creates opportunities for clients to write new, more empowering, life narratives.
This practice is going to catch my imagination due to the following reasons:
Since I begin to engage with the concept of Externalizing the Problem, I was eager at the change possibilities. In conventional approaches to treatment, the difficulties are regarded as disturbing aspects of the person, and this creates pathways to guilt, shame, and helplessness. This depersonalization frees up the clinician and the client from solely viewing the client: as the problem, to view the problem as an entity in and of itself.
This basically is a closely relative of the real deal I have gone through in my lifetime. That is why it is essential to admit that frequently people entangle problems with their personal identity, as a result, the person feels that he is surrounded by the problem and is a part of it. The notion of objects or the possibility of ‘pathologization’, that is, the likelihood of perceiving issues as detached from the person, is empowering. It implies that the issue is not part of the individual and cannot fix, alter, or even engage, with oneself or others..
Personal Connection with the Practice
The reason I feel very close to Externalizing the Problem is because I had the first signs of anxiety during my college days. Anxiety for me was not just an episodic phenomenon; it was a constant companion that coloured my self-image and interactions. In turn, I became enmeshed in a story in which being anxious was not just something that happened to me but something that I was: a story that empowered the problem and disempowered me.
I found the idea of externalization to present a completely different outlook on things that I have been through. It is useful to think of anxiety as some object separate from myself which gradually allowed the construction of a barrier between me and my anxiety. It helped me to regain some of the aspects of my character that I felt that my anxiety was dominating too much. I gradually came to notice this very anxiety as something that befalls someone at times and that is not inherent in their character. What really shocked me was to understand this was mine and this feeling was incredibly liberating and changed the course of my self discovery process.
This personal transformation reinforced my faith in the use of narrative practices as not so much as being therapeutic techniques but as practical life strategies. What do I feel and how do I perceive that it has helped me, Externalization offered me a way of comprehending and addressing my difficulties that seemed both viable and useful. With its help, I was able to look at my problems not as threats, but as challenges – this reshaped the mise-en-scène of agency.
Contrasting with Other Therapeutic Approaches
The process of Externalizing the Problem is quite the opposite of the other types of therapies in which the problem often has to be brought inside. For instance, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is well founded on the alteration of specific thoughts within the person. Although CBT is very good for many clients, this model presupposes that the problem is contained within the client’s cognition.
Unlike Postmodernism, Narrative Therapy prescribes an entirely different way of viewing problems as something which is not a part of the individual (Gilkey, 2021). This matters because it shifts the therapeutic relationship from one of self-repair to one of narrative rewriting. Unlike Cognitive Therapy, Narrative Therapy does not aim at altering thought processes for it prescribes ways in which the client’s story can be told in a manner that empowers him or her to be more self-directed.
Discourses Involved in Externalization and Contrasting...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here