Please refer to the document attached
Assessment 3 Case Analysis/Position Paper Learning outcome assessed Learning Task Assessment Type Weighting K3, K4, K6, K7, S2, S3, S4, S5, A1, A2, A3 Write a critical appraisal of the ethical and legal/statutory tensions inherent in a case study. Explore the implications of these tensions for the clients, and propose a solution that is coherently argued using peer reviewed literature Case Study Analysis 40.0% Due Date: 2 January 2023, 23.59pm. Assignment 3 is an individual assessment task. Details of task: You are working for an agency that supports young Indigenous people in Juvenile Justice. Your agency seeks to lobby government to change Indigenous Juvenile Justice and asks you to draft a position paper that critiques Australia’s poor adherence to relevant UN conventions embodied in local legislation. Clear links should be made to literature and to relevant international, national, state legislative, and ethical frameworks wherever applicable (i.e. you should state relevant legislation, sections, and/or paragraphs). Please note, a clear position/argument must be stated on the issue. Some of the areas that the analysis needs to address are (please note: this is a guide only): 1. Introduction and brief background on the chosen case study (200 words). 2. A critique (based on human rights and conventions, Australian legislation, and professional ethical frameworks) of the way young Indigenous people have been (and continue to be) treated in the Australian Juvenile Justice system. The critique (1000 Words) should include: · Identify at 5 least human rights breaches (refer to the case study for examples) · How these breaches have impacted indigenous youth caught in in the JJ system, their families and wider communities. 3. Research-based recommendations that are informed by social work ethics outlining actions that need to be taken to address the issues you raised (800 words). Case Study: Inside a maximum-security police watch house where children are locked up | Four Corners https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4ShXwJ24xc While the case study is based in Queensland, you can use Victorian legislation that we used in the course to analyse the case study. Word Limit: 2000 words (+/- 10%) Submission: Via submission link in Moodle. Marking Guide: Please refer to your Moodle course outline (Assignment 3 - additional resources). MSWPG7203: Law and Ethics in Social Work Practice Marking Criteria Marking Category Fail (0-49) Pass (50-59) Credit (60-69) Distinction (70-79) High Distinction (80-100) Introduces and outlines historical emergence of JJ focusing on Indigenous youth. 20% Poor introduction that does not capture key developments in the development of JJ focusing on Indigenous youth. Basic introduction and outline that captures key developments in JJ focusing on Indigenous youth. Good introduction and outline of development of JJ focusing on Indigenous youth. Very good introduction and outline of development of JJ focusing on Indigenous youth. Excellent introduction and outline of development of JJ focusing on Indigenous youth. Uses human rights framework to critique Australian JJ legislation and its impacts on Indigenous youth and their families/ communities practice and identifies at least 5 human rights breaches 40% Demonstrates very limited or no understanding of conventions and legislation and their implementation into practice. A critique is largely absent. Demonstrates limited understanding of conventions and legislation and their implementation into practice. A basic critique is provided. Demonstrates some understanding of underpinning conventions and legislation and their implementation into practice. A coherent critique has been provided. Some gaps remain. Demonstrates a very good understanding of underpinning conventions and legislation and their implementation into practice. A sound critique has been provided Demonstrates an excellent understanding of underpinning conventions and legislation and their implementation into practice. And excellent, consistent critique has been provided. Makes Recommendations informed by research, social work values and ethics – including an outline of actions that need to be taken – 20% Recommendations not made or not clearly related to human rights breaches identified in paper. Some relevant recommendations made. Minimal evidence of research. Minimal reference to social work values and ethics. Good, relevant and well-argued recommendations made. Good evidence of research and reference to social work values and ethics. Very good, relevant and well-argued recommendations made. Very good evidence of research and reference to social work values and ethics. Excellent and well-argued recommendations informed by research and social work values made. Structure of Essay and clarity of expression and adherence to APA 7 guidelines 20% Doesn't demonstrate a logical structure. Language/expression not clear. Extensive referencing errors, does not adhere to APA guidelines Demonstrates basic logical structure. Language clear in some places, but not consistently so. Many APA errors present Competent demonstration of logical structure. Language generally clear with well-chosen expressions. Good adherence to APA some errors Very good demonstration of logical structure. Language clear, well-chosen and accurate. Very good adherence to APA guidelines Excellent demonstration of logical structure. Language clear, well-chosen, accurate and no typos or grammatical errors. Excellent adherence to APA 7 guidelines