Please refer to attached assessment 3 requirement and use my personal LPA report and Gallup Report.
Ind301a_Assessment_3 Page 1 of 4 ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEF Subject Code and Title IND301A: Industry Consulting Project Assessment Personal Goals and LPA reflection report Individual/Group Individual Length 1,000 words (+/- 10%) Learning Outcomes e) Demonstrate the ability to critically reflect on work integrated learning activities and self-identify personal goals and learning needs Submission By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday Week 11 Weighting 30% Total Marks 100 marks Context: Goal setting and the ability to openly and critically reflect are important skills that can significantly enhance your career development. Goal setting needs to be done systematically and reflection is an essential part of the continual learning process, which in-turn is crucial to your ongoing relevance and employability. This report will help you formulate your current goals and personal learning needs and can become a template for regular future goal/learning need reviews going forward. For example, you can develop a new version of this report for your personal use at the end of each year to help guide your ongoing development. You must use your Laurate Professional Assessment (LPA). You might also incorporate your Gallup Reports. Instructions: You are required to: • develop a 1,000 word Personal Goals and LPA Reflection report that is professionally presented and with appropriate, numbered headings and sub-headings • include an Executive Summary (not included in the word count) • commence with a short Introduction to the paper that outlines the purpose and structure • include a short, referenced statement of the role/importance of both goal setting and reflection in career development Ind301a_Assessment_3 Page 2 of 4 • Include at least 3 Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant and Timely (SMART) personal goals • Include at least 3 workplace examples from your 200 hours of workplace experience that caused you to reflect and a description of that reflection • Cite and reference at least 3 sources from the modules in this subject • Include your LPA results (and possibly Gallup results) and some reflection on how they relate to your goals and workplace reflection(above) • Conclude with a statement of personal commitment to both future goal setting and regular reflection Note that appendices may be used and are not included in the word count. Submission Instructions: Submit the assessment via the Assessment link, in the main navigation menu, in IND301A, by the end of week 11. The facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades. Laureate assessment_template_T3 2017 Page 3 of 4 Learning Rubric: Assessment 3 Assessment Attributes Fail (Unacceptable) 0-49% Pass (Functional) 50-64% Credit (Proficient) 65-74% Distinction (Advanced) 75 -84% High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100% Use and referencing of accepted research, theory, frameworks and data sources 10 % Accepted research theory and frameworks are not used, referenced and/or understood Data sources are poor An adequate use, referencing and understanding of accepted research theory and frameworks is demonstrated Standard data sources are utilised A good understanding and referencing of accepted research theory and frameworks is demonstrated There is thoughtful use of a diverse range of reliable data sources An advanced use, referencing and understanding of accepted research theory and framework is demonstrated A significant number of high-class data sources are utilised Outstanding use, referencing and understanding of accepted research theory and framework is demonstrated An extensive amount of excellent data sources are utilised Highly innovative sources of data are incorporated Formulates an effective, insightful, robust and justifiable personal goals and reflection report in line with the instructions 70 % Demonstrates limited awareness of context and/or purpose of the assignment Fails to provide a report that is reasonable, useful and/or applicable Demonstrates adequate awareness of context and/or purpose of the assignment Provides a standard, straightforward or obvious report Demonstrates consistent awareness of context and/or purpose of the assignment Provides a good report that reflects insightful analysis and reflection, along with some original thinking Demonstrates an advanced and integrated understanding of context and/or purpose of the assignment Provides an advanced report that reflects well developed analysis and robust reflection, along with original thinking Consistently demonstrates a systematic and critical understanding of context and purpose of the assignment Provides an expert report that reflects sophisticated analysis, extremely robust reflection, along with original thinking Laureate assessment_template_T3 2017 Page 4 of 4 Delivery of a professionally structured, written and presented document 20 % Poorly structured document that is difficult to understand and not well presented Acceptable structure and presentation and adequately written Information, plan and explanations are well structured and written Line of reasoning is easy to follow Information, plan and explanations are very well structured and written Line of reasoning is logical, insightful and easy to follow Valuable graphics and/or supporting data/models or theory are introduced that aid in the explanation of the logic Expertly presented; the plan is logical, persuasive and well supported by theory Line of reasoning and approach is expertly written and clear Extremely effective use of graphics and/or supporting data/models or theory are introduced that aid in the explanation of the logic DecideFeedbackReport_Batch LPA SCORE Name: yong kim Assessment Date: Mar 7 2020 The table below displays your level of proficiency on various competencies required for success in a wide variety of professional roles. Competency ANALYZING AND SOLVING PROBLEMS WORKING WELL WITH OTHERS ACHIEVING OBJECTIVES LEARNING AND SELF-DEVELOPMENT ADAPTING TO CHANGE Scoring Interpretation Key** 8-10 You scored higher on this competency than most other individuals who have completed the assessment. You may still be interested in reviewing some of the suggestions below to strengthen this area even further. 4-7 Your score for this competency is similar to the average score of other individuals who have completed the assessment. You may benefit from taking some of the actions indicated below to help you further strengthen this area. 1-3 You scored lower on this competency than most other individuals who have completed the assessment. You will likely benefit from taking some of the actions indicated below to strengthen your skills in this area. Listed below are development activities organized by competency. We recommend that you use the information in this report along with other feedback you have received about your strengths and development needs to identify no more than 2 or 3 competency areas in which to target your development efforts, and then review the tips provided to identify several within each of your targeted competencies that would be relevant to your situation. For example, some tips may be more relevant to individuals with more work or internship experience, and other tips may be more useful to individuals with less experience. ** Your scores are based on a comparison to students around the world who completed the assessment. Student ID: Institution:00063067T Torrens University (Australia) Establish a few general rules to use when evaluating information and use these rules to decide how much importance to place on the information. You might ask yourself questions such as: What is the source of the information? Is it credible? Is the source reliable? Has a trusted expert provided his/her thoughts? Based on careful analysis of the information that is known, does the new information seem accurate? Identify and collect the information you will need to address a specific problem. Make a list of the information you need and evaluate it according to how it will help resolve the problem. Identify how and where you will get the information. Look for additional sources of data when you are trying to understand an issue or make a decision. Try to find at least one or two new sources of information. Examples of new sources are records of a past event, policies and procedures manuals, individuals who have experience in the area, or research reports on the topic. When you are dealing with a critical issue, ask your manager or a knowledgeable colleague to review your sources of information. Ask the person to help you make sure you have all of the data that you need. Remember to ask yourself, "what could be inaccurate, or what am I missing?" List all facts and information available before you begin to analyze a situation. Ask others to review and add to your list. Use this information to gain an in-depth understanding of the situation. Pay attention to how information from different sources fits together to provide a complete overview of the situation. Break complex problems into component parts and identify the links between the parts. After you've identified how parts are connected, consider the potential impact of a solution on these connected parts before making any decisions. When evaluating a problem, be sure to spend an appropriate amount of time analyzing the data, even if you do not think that data analysis is a strong skill you have. Don't make the mistake of giving the information only a quick review, and resist the temptation to apply a quick solution. As you're reviewing data, consider if there are professional standards and/or technical approaches that should be applied. Obstacles or issues are not always expected. If you are confronted with an unanticipated situation, think about who else might be affected by the circumstances. Inform these individuals in a timely manner of the new developments. When beginning your next project, take time to anticipate problems or obstacles that might arise. Consider issues you may encounter with getting the information or resources you need, with meeting certain deadlines, or even with misunderstanding the objectives of the project. Take steps early on to minimize the likelihood of these issues occurring. Organize an informal brainstorming session to discuss new ways to approach recurring problems, new problems