PLEASE READ THE ASSIGNMENT DESCRIPTION CAREFULLY AND THE DUE DATE IS 23/09
A3 BISY2001-ISY2001-ISY201 T1 2020 Case Study Unit BISY2001-ISY2001-ISY201 System Analysis and Design Assessment Type Case Study Group Assessment Number 3 Assessment Weighting Essay 30% Alignment with Unit and Course Unit Learning Outcome Graduate Attributes Assessed LO 1: Describe and discuss concepts and principals of systems analysis and design. LO 2: Examine the stages of the systems development life cycle. LO 3: Apply basic diagrammatic modelling tools to systems analysis and design. LO 4: Use specifications such as user interfaces, databases, and systems interfaces to design systems to meet specific business/project purposes. GA 1: Communication GA 4: Critical Thinking and Problem Solving GA 6: Flexibility Due Date/Time Week 10 – 29th May 2020 5:00 pm via Moodle Assessment Description In this assessment, students must work in a group to prepare a case study analysis of a systems development project. You are required to form groups of Three to Four (3 to 4) students. Your group is required to research and analyse a real life situation and prepare a full analysis of a systems development project. Feel free to discuss your real life situation project with your lecturer before engaging in any work. Suggested topics below. You may use www.creately.com, www.diagrams.net, MS Word, Visio or any other modeling tool to create diagrams. Your systems analysis and design project should include the following: • Executive summary (max. 1/2 page). 2.5 Marks • Introduction including description of the business, problem/opportunity identified and goal and objectives of this project (max. 1 pages). 2 Marks • Data gathering methodology and results (max. 1 pages). 2.5 Marks • Existing system including current system overview, FDD, DFD, and Data Dictionary. 6 Marks • Proposed system including system overview, system requirements checklist, DFD, Data Dictionary, Object relationship diagram, Use Cases, Class Diagram, and Sequence Diagrams. 12 Marks • Conclusions and recommendations (max. 1/2 page). 2.5 Marks • Group reflection on Assessment 3 (max. 1/2 page). 2.5 Marks Suggested topics (list is not restricted): • Hotel Booking System • Library Management System • Car Rentals System • Online enrolment System • Entertainment System ( movies , songs , Books and games ) • Online Shopping System • Real Estate System • Parking lot booking system • Student information chat bot Detailed Submission Requirements • This assessment must be submitted by one student per group through the link on Moodle page for this unit. • Include a cover sheet that has students’ name, subject, date, report title and WORDCOUNT. • The assignment should not exceed 1,200 words. Diagrams, charts and Data Dictionary do not count towards wordcount. Misconduct • Engaging someone else to write any part of your assessment for you is classified as misconduct. • To avoid being charged with Misconduct, students need to submit their own work. • Remember that this is a Turnitin assignment and plagiarism will be subject to severe penalties. • The AIH misconduct policy and procedure can be read on the AIH website (https://aih.nsw.edu.au/about-us/policies-procedures/). Late Submission • Late submission is not permitted, practical submission link will close after 1 hour. Special consideration • Students whose ability to submit or attend an assessment item is affected by sickness, misadventure or other circumstances beyond their control, may be eligible for special consideration. No consideration is given when the condition or event is unrelated to the student's performance in a component of the assessment, or when it is considered not to be serious. • Students applying for special consideration must submit the form within 3 days of the due date of the assessment item or exam. • The form can be obtained from the AIH website (https://aih.nsw.edu.au/current-students/student-forms/) or on-campus at Reception. • The request form must be submitted to Student Services. Supporting evidence should be attached. For further information please refer to the Student Assessment Policy and associated Procedure available on (https://aih.nsw.edu.au/about-us/policies-procedures/). Marking Schema Rubrics Marking Criteria HD D C P F ULO 1: Describe and discuss concepts and principals of systems analysis and design ULO 2: Examine the stages of the systems development life cycle ULO 3: Apply basic diagrammatic modelling tools to systems analysis and design ULO 4: Use specifications such as user interfaces, databases, and systems interfaces to design systems to meet specific business/project purposes. Executive summary: Reflects all of the following characteristics: conciseness, accuracy, and objectivity. Introduction: Description of the business, problem/opportunity identified and goal and objectives of this project are clear and reflect a true work on the project. Data gathering methodology and results: Clear and reflect a true work on the project. Existing System: System overview, FDD, DFD, and Data Dictionary are fully correct. Proposed System: System overview, system requirements checklist, DFD, Data Dictionary, Object relationship diagram, Use Cases, Class Diagram, and Sequence Diagrams are fully correct. Conclusion and recommendations: Clear and reflect a true work on the project. Reflection: Genuine and accurate. (25 - 30 marks) Executive summary: Reflects the following characteristics: conciseness, accuracy, and objectivity with minor mistakes. Introduction: Description of the business, problem/opportunity identified and goal and objectives of this project are somewhat unclear and reflect a good effort on the project. Data gathering methodology and results: Somewhat unclear and reflect a good effort on the project. Existing System: System overview, FDD, DFD, and Data Dictionary are fully correct with minor errors. Proposed System: System overview, system requirements checklist, DFD, Data Dictionary, Object relationship diagram, Use Cases, Class Diagram, and Sequence Diagrams are fully correct with minor errors. Conclusion and recommendations: Somewhat unclear and reflect a good effort on the project. Reflection: Genuine and accurate with minor mistakes. (22 – 25 marks) Executive summary: Unclear and does not reflect all of the following characteristics: conciseness, accuracy, and objectivity. Introduction: Description of the business, problem/opportunity identified and goal and objectives of this project are unclear and do not reflect a true work on the project. Data gathering methodology and results: Somewhat unclear and do not reflect a true work on the project. Existing System: System overview, FDD, DFD, and Data Dictionary are partially correct with a few errors. Proposed System: System overview, system requirements checklist, DFD, Data Dictionary, Object relationship diagram, Use Cases, Class Diagram, and Sequence Diagrams are partially correct with a few errors. Conclusion and recommendations: Somewhat unclear and reflect a good effort on the project. Reflection: Appears to be unauthentic and partially accurate. (19 - 22 marks) Executive summary: Inaccurate and does not reflect any of the following characteristics: conciseness, accuracy, and objectivity. Introduction: Description of the business, problem/opportunity identified and goal and objectives of this project are inaccurate and do not reflect any effort in the project. Data gathering methodology and results: Inaccurate explanation and does not reflect any effort in the project. Existing System: System overview, FDD, DFD, and Data Dictionary are not accurate. Proposed System: System overview, system requirements checklist, DFD, Data Dictionary, Object relationship diagram, Use Cases, Class Diagram, and Sequence Diagrams are inaccurate. Conclusion and recommendations: Are no accurate. Reflection: Appears to be unauthentic and inaccurate. (15 - 19 marks) Executive summary: Is not attempted or quite unclear and incomplete. Introduction: Description of the business, problem/opportunity identified and goal and objectives of this project are not attempted or quite unclear and incomplete. Data gathering methodology and results: Are not attempted or quite unclear and incomplete. Existing System: System overview, FDD, DFD, and Data Dictionary are not attempted or incomplete. Proposed System: System overview, system requirements checklist, DFD, Data Dictionary, Object relationship diagram, Use Cases, Class Diagram, and Sequence Diagrams are not attempted or incomplete. Conclusion and recommendations: Are not accurate. Reflection: Is not attempted or dishonest. (0 - 15 marks)