Please prepare me a 10 pages about ( A Byte Out of History $10 Million Hack, 1994-Style) case. Here is a link to take idea about the case...

Running Head: CASE STUDY                                 1
CASE STUDY                                         3
A BYTE OUT OF HISTORY $10 MILLION HACK, 1994-STYLE
CASE STUDY
Abstract
This report realizes the different instances of the case “A Byte out of History $10 Million Hack, 1994-Style” where a Russian criminal has been found to steal 10 million USD from Citibank in the US by employing two agents in the US that belonged to Russia. The different legal instances and political developments associated with the case in relation to the judicial system have been analyzed in this report.
Table of Contents
Abstract    2
1. What countries/ jurisdictions are involved?    4
1.1 What regulatory barriers could prevent the collection of information on the alleged perpetrators in the foreign jurisdiction?    4
1.2 Is there potential for government cooperation    5
2. How would the assets flow from the victims in the U.S. to other countries?    5
2.1 Were assets held temporarily in one country before moving onto the destination?    6
2.2 Were money mules, straw businesses, or money laundering techniques involved?    7
2.3 Were any government officials involved?    8
3. How could the proceeds of the crime be seized, forfeited, and repatriated for the victims?    8
3.1 Is there potential for government cooperation    10
3.2 Would a defendant’s cooperation be necessary (or even sufficient)?    11
4. References    12
1. What countries/ jurisdictions are involved?
Two countries had been included in this case and the jurisdictions based on these countries have been evident from the case study. The first country has been the United States where CitiBank has been subjected to stealing money (Sara, 2019). The other country involved has been Russia, from where the operations have been carried out in St Petersburg. Therefore, the jurisdiction of Russia has also been included in this case. In simpler terms, both the US and Russia had been included in the case.
1.1 What regulatory barriers could prevent the collection of information on the alleged perpetrators in the foreign jurisdiction?
In many cases, it is evident that the criminals who are the alleged perpetrators residing in a different country face some of the advantages with respect to the foreign jurisdiction. In this case, it sometimes becomes difficult for the countries to gather information about the alleged perpetrators according to the foreign jurisdiction parameters (Sara, 2019). In this case, the Government of the foreign country plays a vital role in collaborating and communicating with the host country in extracting the information about the alleged perpetrator.
One of the primary levels of jurisdiction that may serve as a barrier to this process is the Human rights commission. Human rights play a significant role in ensuring that individuals regardless of their personal identity in a definite country are safeguarded against the other countries in terms of the allegations that are laid on them. Therefore, in this case Human rights perform the role of the primary barrier for the alleged perpetrator in this case.
However, in this case, the barriers may be resolved through the implementation of the extraterritorial jurisdiction (Li & Qin, 2018). Through the implementation of the extraterritorial jurisdiction, it may or rather be favorable for the countries together with a significant level of information residing in a given country under the grounds of the alleged perpetrator. Business barriers are also one of the primary reasons that may be evident in the context of the alleged perpetrator in this case.
1.2 Is there potential for government cooperation
It is evident that the alleged perpetrator has been successful in transferring around 10 million US dollars from Citibank in the US into other offshore accounts while operating in Russia. In this case, the substantial amount of money being stolen from Citibank may prove to be a significant loss for the Government of the country. Consequently, in terms of Russia, the alleged perpetrator has been found to utilizing unethical and criminal activities in transferring the money from one bank to another.
Therefore, in this case, a strict level of negotiation may be made between the US government and the Russian government to allow the scope for further investigation into this case (Khalifa, 2020). However, in this condition, no direct law may be applied where the US FBI team may move to Russia for this investigation. Therefore, in this case, the investigating team will be formed in Russia that will investigate the issues of the theft in Russia and consequently continue to present information to the FBI in the US.
2. How would the assets flow from the victims in the U.S. to other countries?
The role of the assets, in this case, has been found to be variable and difficult to be traced. In many cases, it is evident that the assets continue to transfer the money from Citibank in the US to a bank in San Francisco where cash would be withdrawn by the individuals that are recruited by the alleged perpetrator. This cache may then be grasped by the individuals working in the US for residing in the US in a very short span of time.
Consequently, this withdrawal money would then be carried by these agents, who are primarily the agents of the criminals in...