Please pick a prior court case dealing with a healthcare issue that interests you, a current healthcare event/issue that is pending or that has been in the news, or any like healthcare issue that is...

1 answer below »
Please pick a prior court case dealing with a healthcare issue that interests you, a current healthcare event/issue that is pending or that has been in the news, or any like healthcare issue that is worthy of writing about and would be of interest to you or others. Whatever the topic/issue, you should be able to write about it using the criteria outlined below. If the topic does not lend itself to these criteria, it is probably not a good topic to consider. please i would like refrences on this assingment and in an apa format. this is a final research project

Answered Same DayDec 22, 2021

Answer To: Please pick a prior court case dealing with a healthcare issue that interests you, a current...

David answered on Dec 22 2021
130 Votes
HEALTH CARE LAW
HEALTH CARE LAW 1
LAW
STUDENT’ NAME
COURSE, YEAR
UNIVERSITY NAME
PROFESSOR’S NAME
HEALTH CARE LAW 2
ABSTRACT
Contract is defined as an agreement enforceable by comman
dment. Agreement is
an indispensable constituent of a valid contract. Congregation of minds on a
fastidious issue is an imperative element of a valid contract. Let us refer to the case
analysis of Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. [1893] Q.B. 256 (C.A.).
HEALTH CARE LAW 3
FACTS
Carbolic Smoke Ball co. is a renowned patent medicine company in Healthcare
Industry. The Carbolic Smoke Ball Co created the 'Carbolic Smoke Ball'
premeditated to avert users contracting influenza or analogous infections. The
company advertised that it would endow with a reward of 100 pounds to anyone
who contracted influenza subsequent to employing the smoke balls of the company
for a definite interlude according to the printed guidelines. Mrs. Carlill procured
the advertised smoke ball and contracted influenza in spite of employing the smoke
ball according to the printed guidelines. She alleged the reward of 100 pounds.
Carbolic Smoke Ball repudiated to reimburse and Carlill litigated for damages
cropping up from breach of contract. Verdict for 100 pounds was entered for
Carlill and Carbolic Smoke Ball petitioned (Robert W. Emerson J.D., 2009).
HELD
On the concern of whether there was a legitimate offer: The Company disagreed
that the ‘promise’ was not formulated to anybody in fastidious. The Court,
conversely, detained that this was not a contract with the humanity but was merely
an offer to the world competent of developing into a contract with anybody
performing the stipulated state of affairs. The Court moreover discarded the
HEALTH CARE LAW 4
Company's allege that their advertisement comprised of a mere 'puff' and was not
projected to be promissory. The Court was aided in this concern by the...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here