Page 1 of 3 MPM712, T XXXXXXXXXXAssignment 3 Criteria Inadequate/ not attempted Needs improvement Acceptable Good Very Good Excellent SECTION A: INTERVIEW WITH ENTREPENEUR/INTRAPRENEUR Entrepreneur...

please perefer the docs and get ne the best solution


Page 1 of 3 MPM712, T2 2020 - Assignment 3 Criteria Inadequate/ not attempted Needs improvement Acceptable Good Very Good Excellent SECTION A: INTERVIEW WITH ENTREPENEUR/INTRAPRENEUR Entrepreneur overview 5 points ULO 1 (GLO8) 0.7 Does not address any of the assessment criteria. Range (0-1.4) 2.0 Entrepreneur was not interviewed in person; minimal provision of interview summary (date, time, length, format or questions/answers) and expressed less than adequately Range (1.5-2.4) 2.7 Entrepreneur not interviewed in person or interview was poorly conducted; most aspects of interview summary (date, time, length, format or questions/answers) provided but expressed only adequately Range (2.5-2.9) 3.2 Entrepreneur interviewed in person; all aspects of interview summary (date, time, length, format or questions/answers) provided with good expression Range (3.0-3.4) 3.7 Entrepreneur interviewed in person; all aspects of interview summary (date, time, length, format or questions/answers) provided with very good expression Range (3.5-3.9) 5 Entrepreneur interviewed in person; all aspects of interview summary (date, time, length, format or questions/answers) provided with excellent expression Range (4.0-5.0) Entrepreneur insights 5 points ULO 1 (GLO1) 0.7 Does not address any of the assessment criteria. Range (0-1.4) 2.0 Justification of selection of entrepreneur and insights not well identified or poorly communicated Range (1.5-2.4) 2.7 Justification of selection of entrepreneur and insights adequately communicated Range (2.5 – 2.9) 3.2 Justification of selection of entrepreneur and insights well communicated Range (3 – 3.4) 3.7 Justification of selection of entrepreneur and insights very well communicated Range (3.5 – 3.9) 5 Justification of selection of entrepreneur and insights excellently communicated Range (4 - 5) SECTION B: PERSONAL AUDIT Personal Innovation capability audit 10 points ULO 1 (GLO8) 1.5 Makes vague, little or no references to previous learning; has difficulty applying knowledge and skills to demonstrate comprehension of innovation concepts to own capabilities. Range (0-2.9) 4.0 Reviews prior learning (past experiences inside and outside of the class room) in some depth, revealing clarified meanings and/or changed perspectives about own innovative capabilities. Range (3.0-4.9) 5.5 Reviews prior learning (past experiences inside and outside of the class room) in depth, revealing fully clarified meanings and/or changed perspectives about own innovative capabilities. Range (5.0-5.9) 6.5 Begins to critically review prior learning (past experiences inside and outside of the classroom) in depth to reveal clarified meanings and significantly advanced perspectives about education/life experiences, which provide foundation for expanded knowledge about own innovative capabilities. Range (6.0-6.9) 7.5 Demonstrates consolidated and critical review of prior learning (past experiences inside and outside of the classroom) in depth to reveal clarified meanings and significantly advanced perspectives about education/life experiences, which provide foundation for expanded knowledge about own innovative capabilities. Range (7.0-7.9) 10 Demonstrates exceptional critical review of prior learning (past experiences inside and outside of the classroom) in depth and supplements this with quality feedback from additional sources to reveal fully clarified meanings and significantly advanced perspectives about education/life experiences, which provide foundation for expanded knowledge about their own innovative capabilities. Range (8.0-10.0) Page 2 of 3 Innovation capability plan 5 points ULO 1 (GLO1) 0.7 Does not apply knowledge and skills in planning how to continue to maintain and/or develop innovation management capabilities. Range (0-1.4) 2.0 Demonstrates some knowledge, skills and some judgement, adaptability, and a level of responsibility, accountability and professionalism in planning how to continue to maintain and/or develop innovation management capabilities. Acceptable creativity and initiative means that you have a solid plan, however it could be improved upon significantly. Range (1.5-2.4) 2.7 Applies appropriate knowledge, skills and acceptable judgement, adaptability, and a higher level of responsibility, accountability and professionalism in planning how to continue to maintain and/or develop innovation management capabilities. Acceptable creativity and initiative means that you have a consolidating plan which requires some minor tweaking. Range (2.5-2.9) 3.2 Applies good knowledge and skills with higher judgement, adaptability, and a level of responsibility, accountability and professionalism in planning how to continue to maintain and/or develop innovation management capabilities. Good creativity and initiative means that you have a solid plan. Range (3.0-3.4) 3.7 Mostly demonstrates a high level of knowledge and skills as well as generating novel information with a high level of authority, responsibility, expert judgement, professionalism and accountability in planning how to continue to maintain and/or develop innovation management capabilities. High level of creativity and initiative means that you have a very good plan which just requires some small tweaks. Range (3.5-3.9) 5 Consistently demonstrates an exceedingly high level of creativity and initiative and applies knowledge and skills as well as generating novel information with a high level of authority, responsibility, expert judgement, professionalism and accountability in planning how to continue to maintain and/or develop innovation management capabilities. Exceedingly high level of creativity and initiative means that you have produced an exceptional plan which shows real insight into the area of innovation management. Range (4.0-5.0) SECTION C: TOOLKIT Overview of innovation models 6 points ULO 4 (GLO6) 0.9 Shows a superficial or no understanding of the innovation models Range (0-1.7) 2.4 Shows some understanding of the innovation models. This means that you have highlighted some of the key models but not all. Range (1.8-2.9) 3.3 Shows sufficient breadth and depth of understanding of innovation models. This means that you have identified most of the key models but may not be that clear on all of them. Range (3.0-3.5) 3.9 Shows good breadth and depth of understanding of innovation models. This means that you have identified most of the key models and are clear on all of them. Range (3.6-4.1) 4.5 Shows very good breadth and depth of understanding of innovation models. This means that you have identified the key models and have done a solid job in explaining them. Range (4.2-4.7) 6 Shows excellent breadth and depth of understanding of innovation models. This means that you have identified key models, categorized them and shown through your explanations that you have an in- depth understanding of them Range (4.8-6.0) Selection and application of two models to suit entrepreneur now/future 6 points ULO 4 (GLO6) 0.9 Your selection is not well aligned with the industry sector and your application of the model is too superficial. Range (0-1.7) 2.4 Your selection is somewhat aligned with the industry sector and your application of the model is basic. Range (1.8-2.9) 3.3 Your selection is aligned with the industry sector and your application of the model is appropriate. Range (3.0-3.5) 3.9 Your selection is aligned with the industry sector and your application of the model is appropriate. Range (3.6-4.1) 4.5 Your selection is well aligned with the industry sector and your application of the model is very good. Range (4.2-4.7) 6 Your selection is very well aligned with the industry sector; in applying your model you demonstrate a clear and convincing analysis Range (4.8-6.0) Presentation, citations and referencing 3 points 0.4 Poor presentation, citations and references