please have a look , assesment 1 and 2 was done here, this is assesment 3....
MIS605_Assessment 1_Case Study Page 1 of 1 Online Student Enrolment System at ABC University ABC University (ABCU) is seeking to develop an online student enrolment system (the System) whereby the students would be able to enrol themselves into eligible subjects at the beginning of each trimester and pay their tuition fees online. You have been hired as the Business Analyst for this project. Founded in Sydney in 2013, ABCU has experienced a remarkable growth in student numbers in recent years and has opened new campuses in three other Australian cities including Melbourne, Brisbane and Adelaide. ABCU currently has 50,000 students across their four campuses with an estimated 5000 student in-take in each trimester. This phenomenal growth in their student numbers has necessitated the need for an online student enrolment system. Once developed, this system will replace the manual enrolment process that is currently in place. The current manual enrolment process is labour- intensive, error-prone, and rather inefficient as it requires the Student Enrolment Officers to manually enrol each student into the subjects upon the receipt of a study plan from the students. The Pro Vice Chancellor (Learning and Teaching) envisage an online student enrolment system which would allow students to complete their enrolments and tuition fee payments before the Census date. The System should not only enable Student Enrolment Officers of each School to create, edit and remove Courses offered by their School but also to create, edit and remove core subjects and electives offered in each course. The students should be able to access the system through a device of their choice (e.g. desktop web browser, mobile phone or tablet app). Most subjects would have pre-requisites that must be satisfied before the students are eligible to enrol in the subject. It would be the responsibility of the Program Directors to provide and update the relevant course and subject information including the descriptor, availability (i.e. whether a subject or a course is offered in a certain trimester) and the prerequisites. The Timetabling Officers may also create, edit and remove timetables for each available Subject through the new System. Each campus will hold multiple classes for the same subject. A Subject is offered in the form of classes. Each campus may offer multiple classes for the same Subject. Once logged into the System, students should be able to view all the available subjects, enrol in and drop subjects. The System will detect timetable clashes and prevent students from enrolling into subjects that clash. The System should not let students to enrol in too many or few subjects unless they have an increased or reduced study load approved by the Student Enrolment Officer. Once the enrolment has been completed the system will generate a timetable customised to each individual student outlining the class times and locations. The System will then prompt the students to pay their tuition fees through a secure payment process. The System should be able to send email reminders to students who have not completed the enrolment process by a designated deadline. It should also allow the Student Enrolment Officers and Program Directors to generate customized reports (e.g. a report showing a total number of students enrolled in a particular subject or a course). MIS605_Assessment_3_Brief_VideoCollage_Module 6 Page 1 of 6 Task Summary Apply human interface design skills and design a prototype either as a web application or a mobile application for an online student enrolment system and create a short video describing the prototype to a client. Context In the previous two assessments (i.e. Assessment 1 and 2), you conducted a requirement analysis and a high-level design for an online student enrolment system. Using the human interface design principles and techniques, now it is time to develop a prototype for ABCU and communicate that prototype to the relevant stakeholders involved the project. Task Instructions Group formation Form groups of 2 -3 members. Please read the attached MIS605_Assessment 3_Group Working Guide document for more information about group formation. Case scenario Please read Assessment 1_Case Study - Online Student Enrolment System at ABC University. Please note that every piece of information provided in this case study serves a purpose. ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEF Subject Code and Title MIS605 Systems Analysis and Design Assessment Assessment 3 – Video Collage Individual/Group Group Length 15 minutes Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include: (d) Demonstrate team work skills and empathy while maintaining high level of ethical and legal behaviour and standards as a professional. Submission Due by 11:55pm AEST Sunday end of Module 6.1 (Week 11) Weighting 30% Total Marks 100 marks MIS605_Assessment_3_Brief_VideoCollage_Module 6 Page 2 of 6 Complete the following tasks: Part A – The Prototype Based on the case study as well as the requirement analysis and design specification you completed for Assessment 1 and Assessment 2 respectively, develop a prototype for the System. The prototype must address the following criteria: conform to human interface design guidelines in Module 5 reflect all major functional requirements in the case and additional requirements in Assignment 1 be in a digital form, viz. Please note that hand drawn on a piece of paper is not acceptable enable all actors of the System to perform their designated task be designed as either a web application XOR a mobile app. (60 marks) Part B - Video Record a video of YOU demonstrating the prototype you built in Task 1 to the Pro-Vice Chancellor (Learning and Teaching) of ABCU. The length of the video should be between 13 – 15 minutes. As a minimum, you will need to demonstrate: how the prototype/IS solution meets the business requirement of ABCU the advantages of the type of application of choice over the other. For example, if the prototype is a mobile app, demonstrate advantages of a mobile app over a web application how each actor in the System will interact with the System, viz. how they would be able to complete their tasks through the System (40 marks) Part C – Peer Evaluation It is required that each individual student complete a confidential peer evaluation on the other team members. Please see documents Group Work Guidelines and Group Participation Matrix found in Assessment 3 link via main navigation menu. Referencing It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing here http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing Submission Instructions There are two submission points for this assessment: Graded submission- Group submission Each team will submit a video and all the supporting documents via the Assessment 3 section found in the main navigation menu of the subject Blackboard site. You are required to compress all files into a single zip file (i.e. the video and the prototype with all supporting documents). http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing MIS605_Assessment_3_Brief_VideoCollage_Module 6 Page 3 of 6 Please submit ONE zip file (.zip, NOT .rar) via the Assessment link within Assessment 3. All use case diagrams must be inserted into that MSWord document. Physical copies/Email submissions are not accepted. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades. Peer Evaluation – Individual Submission Each individual student is to submit a completed team participation score matrix document in the Assessment 3 – Peer Evaluation submission link. Please submit a peer review correctly, as no submission may result is zero grading for this assessment criteria. MIS605_Assessment_3_Brief_VideoCollage_Module 6 Page 4 of 6 Assessment Rubric Assessment Attributes Fail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49% Pass (Functional) 50-64% Credit (Proficient) 65-74% Distinction (Advanced) 75-84% High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100% User Interface Design 40% The prototype reflects limited knowledge of the user interface design guidelines for the platform of choice, which is demonstrated by meeting the following criteria: The interfaces are not user friendly and are difficult to navigate. The design language is used inconsistently. It is not evident that the user interface attempted to accommodate users with different skill levels. The user interface does not respond to different screen sizes, orientation or resolutions. The prototype functional knowledge of the user interface design guidelines for the platform of choice, which is demonstrated by meeting the following criteria: The interfaces are not entirely user friendly and some less advanced users may find it difficult to navigate. There is noticeable inconsistency in the design language. The user interface made an unsuccessful attempt to accommodate users with different skill levels. The user interface changes according to screen sizes but there is significant room for improvement in the adjusted layout. The prototype reflects proficient knowledge of the user interface design guidelines for the platform of choice, which is demonstrated by meeting the following criteria: The interfaces are moderately user friendly and are easy to navigate. The design language is used somewhat consistently. The user interface accommodates users with two different skill levels. The user interface auto adjusts to different screen sizes and orientation, but the adjusted layout has some room for improvement. The prototype reflects