PLease have a look and let me know if you have any questions and this assignment is due tomorrow. Kindly provide it to me by tomorrow 7 PM Sydney time.
PROJ6002_Assessment_2_Brief_Plans_Module 3 Page 1 of 6 ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEF Subject Code and Title PROJ6002: Project Planning and Budgeting Assessment Project Scope and Quality Management Plans Individual/Group Group (2 Students) Length 2600 words Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include: (a) Evaluate and apply a range of project management tools, techniques and practices to diverse global projects. (b) Evaluate budgetary and planning outcomes against project success measures, including stakeholder expectations. (c) Develop effective communication methods to articulate planning outcomes to key stakeholders. Submission Due by 11:55 pm AEST/AEDT Sunday end of Module 3. Weighting 35% Total Marks 100 marks Assessment Task In a group of 2 students, devise project scope and quality management plans that articulate the scope and quality approaches for the project in the assigned Case Study provided by your Learning Facilitator. Please refer to the Instructions for details on how to complete this task. Context The backbone of a project manager’s work is the Project Management Plan. This plan details the project's execution, monitoring, and control. It combines all of the planning's sub-plans and baselines. You and your group will create a Project Management Plan for your assigned Case Study in this assessment. Applying scope and quality tools and techniques to develop the scope statement and scope and quality management plans of a project is a crucial part of project planning. One of the keys to project success is effective scope management. Project Scope Management includes processes to ensure that the project includes all work required to complete it successfully. PROJ6002_Assessment_2_Brief_Plans_Module 3 Page 2 of 6 A project's quality management plan defines quality requirements, standards for the project and its deliverables, and how the project will demonstrate compliance. One of the main benefits of this process is that it provides guidance and direction on how quality will be managed and validated throughout the project. Instructions 1. Connect with your assigned group members (provided by your Learning Facilitator). 2. Analyse the project from your own perspectives as up-and-coming project manager 3. Your group will devise subsidiary Project Management plans for Scope and Quality, using the assigned Case Study provided on Blackboard by your Learning Facilitator. a) Although all students will receive the same case study, you are expected to complete this task and create a distinct set of plans in your group. b) These project scope and quality management plans and supporting documentation must include, but not be limited to, the following components: ● Project Goals and Objectives ● Project Scope Statement ● Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) ● Quality Responsibilities ● Approaches to Quality Assurance, Control and Improvement ● Quality Metrics 4. Write 2600 words and describe the processes, tools, and techniques used in your scope and quality management plans, as well as your justification for the quality metrics selected. 5. You can use the template in this subject’s Learning Resources or create your own to devise the subsidiary project scope and quality management plans. 6. After completing your plans and supporting documentation, each member of your group should reflect on your respective contributions to the assessment and then (individually) complete the Group Contribution Survey. Referencing It is essential that you use the most recent edition of APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing in the Academic Skills webpage. Submission Instructions Remember that only ONE group member should upload ONE copy of your group’s assessment file(s) via the Assessment 2 link in the main navigation menu in PROJ6002 – Project Planning and Budgeting. Submit your answers in an academic style, including both in-text citations and a full reference list using the correct APA style of referencing. Each member of your group must also individually complete the Group Contribution Survey in the Assessment 2 link in the main navigation menu in PROJ6002 – Project Planning and Budgeting. https://library.torrens.edu.au/academicskills/apa/tool PROJ6002_Assessment_2_Brief_Plans_Module 3 Page 3 of 6 Your assessment will be formally graded via the Grade Centre by your Learning Facilitator and feedback will be provided through My Grades. Academic Integrity All students in the group are responsible for ensuring that all work submitted is their own and is appropriately referenced and academically written according to the Academic Writing Guide. Students also need to have read and be aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure and subsequent penalties for academic misconduct. These are viewable online. Students also must keep a copy of all submitted material and any assessment drafts. Special Consideration To apply for special consideration for a modification to an assessment or exam due to unexpected or extenuating circumstances, please consult the Assessment Policy for Higher Education Coursework and ELICOS and, if applicable to your circumstance, submit a completed Application for Assessment Special Consideration Form to your Learning Facilitator. https://laureate-au.blackboard.com/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_20163_1&content_id=_2498847_1&mode=reset http://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-and-forms https://laureate-au.blackboard.com/bbcswebdav/xid-4650246_1 https://laureate-au.blackboard.com/bbcswebdav/xid-4650246_1 https://laureate-au.blackboard.com/bbcswebdav/xid-4652143_1 https://laureate-au.blackboard.com/bbcswebdav/xid-4652143_1 PROJ6002_Assessment_2_Brief_Plans_Module 3 Page 4 of 6 Assessment Rubric Assessment Attributes Fail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49% Pass (Functional) 50-64% Credit (Proficient) 65-74% Distinction (Advanced) 75-84% High Distinction (Highly advanced) 85-100% Knowledge and understanding of project scope and quality management. Applies project scope and quality management tools and techniques. Percentage for this criterion = 35 % Demonstrates a partially developed understanding of project scope and quality management. Key components of the assignment are not addressed, including elements of scope or quality management plans and/or relevant tools and techniques are not applied. Demonstrates a functional knowledge of project scope and quality management. Demonstrates a limited application of project scope and quality tools and techniques to project planning. Demonstrates proficient knowledge of project scope and quality management. Demonstrates a proficient application of project scope and quality tools and techniques to project planning. Demonstrates advanced knowledge of project scope and quality management. Demonstrates an advanced application of project scope and quality tools and techniques to project planning. Demonstrates highly advanced knowledge of project scope and quality management. Demonstrates a highly advanced application of project scope and quality tools and techniques to project planning. Effectively utilises the case study and presents the required elements of project scope and quality management plans. Percentage for this criterion = 35 % Very limited presentation of information related to the assigned case study Does not adhere to the format of scope and quality management plans. Very limited range of specialised language and terminology; frequent errors Limited presentation of information related to the assigned case study Largely adheres to the format of project scope and quality management plans. Limited range of specialised language and terminology with some errors Adequate presentation of information related to the assigned case study Adheres to the format of project scope and quality management plans. Adequate range of specialised language and terminology with occasional errors Skilful presentation of information related to the assigned case study Adheres to the format of project scope and quality management plans. Range of specialised language and terminology with very few errors Very skilful presentation of information related to the assigned case study Adheres to the format of project scope and quality management plans. Wide range of specialised language and terminology with no errors PROJ6002_Assessment_2_Brief_Plans_Module 3 Page 5 of 6 Assessment Attributes Fail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49% Pass (Functional) 50-64% Credit (Proficient) 65-74% Distinction (Advanced) 75-84% High Distinction (Highly advanced) 85-100% Effective Communication (Written) Percentage for this criterion = 10 % Very limited organisation, text, structure and coherence Frequent errors in spelling, grammar and/or punctuation Limited organisation, text, structure and coherence Some errors in spelling, grammar and/or punctuation Adequate organisation, text, structure and coherence Occasional errors in spelling, grammar and/or punctuation Good organisation, text, structure and coherence Very few errors in spelling, grammar and/or punctuation Very good organisation, text, structure and coherence No errors in spelling, grammar and/or punctuation Teamwork Percentage for this criterion = 10 % Does not maintain awareness of changing team needs and does not adjusts own workload to ensure team commitments are met. Submission is inconsistent in style and design, and