please go through the description and example
Assessment feedback School of Management BUSS 3082 Staffing Organisations Assignment 2b – New hire/ Recruitment and selection campaign Weighting 60% of 70% (42% of overall mark) Due: 27 May 2018 by 11pm Student name: The Graduate qualities being assessed by this assignment are: Operates effectively with and upon a body of knowledge of sufficient depth to begin professional practice in understanding and analysing existing business practice (QC1); is prepared for life-long learning in pursuit of personal development and excellence in professional practice by applying existing knowledge and skills to understand organisational business practice to identify better methods for undertaking student pre-employment preparation (QC2); is an effective problem solver, capable of applying logical, critical, and creative thinking to a range of problems, by analysing interview data and proposing business practices that meet social, legal, ethical and business needs (QC3); can work both autonomously and collaboratively as a professional, by undertaking a limited research task that requires a combination of individual effort and group work (QC4); communicates effectively in professional practice and as a member of the community, demonstrated through interviewing and report writing (QC6) Assessment Criteria Needs work Satisfactory Excellent HR Planning Demonstrates an appropriate application of HR planning given the job and organisation Legal context Steps taken to avoid direct discrimination Steps taken to avoid indirect discrimination Strategy acknowledges relevant law Job analysis Clear explanation of the job analysis process Clear rationale for specific KSAOs/competencies Appropriate position description Appropriate selection criteria Recruitment Realistic target group(s) of potential candidates Identifies feasible means of promoting the position to potential applicants Identifies appropriate recruitment source(s) Utilises appropriate recruitment source(s) Recruitment material recognises the appeal (or lack of) of the position and organisation? Is the recruitment material as appealing as it could be (given the limitations of the job and organisation?) Appropriate approach to developing a recruitment pool Acknowledges potential applicant reactions Appropriate use of realistic job preview (if applicable) Appropriate use of employee referral Appropriate use of employee value proposition Selection Clear strategy for selecting candidates Clear rationale for the selection approach Selection approach clearly focusses on the KSAOs/competencies/selection criteria Appreciates range of possible selection techniques Proposes use of appropriate selection techniques Onboarding Clear onboarding strategy Appropriate onboarding strategy Overall Could the document be easily understood by a manager with limited understanding of HR? Is the approach realistic and practical? Coherent (good) or piecemeal strategy (bad) Appropriate punctuation, spelling and grammar Poor Strong Does the student have a limited or extensive understanding of the course material? Limited Extensive Comments: Paper late? Y/N How many days?: ___ Penalty at 5% per day: ___ Grade: Recruitment and Selection of Organisational Talent Assessment 2b Marking Rubric Student name: Course learning outcomes: · CO1 Undertake workforce planning recognising external and internal workforce conditions. · CO2 plan and conduct a job analysis to develop a job description and specification. · CO3 critically evaluate internal and external methods of recruitment and selection, recognising social, legal, ethical and business issues and changing workforce demographics and technology. · CO4 plan, manage, implement and evaluate appropriate recruitment, selection, and onboarding strategies for an organization. · CO5 develop practical skills in developing selection criteria, evaluating resumes, conduct of structured interviews, assessing candidates, making final hiring decision and evaluating organisational effectiveness of staffing systems. Assessment 2: Recruitment Campaign Report: 2000 words: 50% F1-F2 P1-P2 C HD - D MARKS Comments Critical evaluation of suitable methods and relevant contextual issues (20/100 marks) (0-9) Accesses irrelevant information, or information lacks quality. The information presented is fragmented, not appropriately interpreted or evaluated, and/or used inappropriately (e.g. taken out of context or incorrect), so the intended purpose is not achieved. (10-12) Accesses information using simple search strategies, and retrieves information from limited and similar sources. Communicates and organises relevant information but is only partially synthesised. Interprets and evaluates information to some extent, but analysis is only partially coherent. (13-14) Selects types and sources of information that are useful and appropriate for the question. Interprets and evaluates information to develop a coherent analysis. Communicates, organises, and synthesises relevant information to achieve the purpose effectively. (15-20) Selects types and sources of information that are the most appropriate for the question. Interprets and evaluates information to develop a comprehensive critical analysis. Communicates, organises, and synthesises relevant information, and achieves the purpose with clarity and depth. Strategic planning, interpretation, and evaluation (50/100 marks) (0-24) The proposed strategy is not feasible, original and/or creative. Does not consider or address alternative or divergent ideas, including possible obstacles. (25-32) The proposed strategy is feasible and appropriate to the context. Advantages and disadvantages of different approaches are identified, but may only be partially discussed. The strategy is original, but not very creative. The assignment mainly reproduces existing exemplars, and does not experiment with novel or unique contributions to strategic thinking and decision making. (33-37) The proposed strategy is feasible, appropriate, original and creative. Advantages and disadvantages of different approaches are considered. Alternatives are either appropriately excluded, or partially incorporated to develop effective courses of actions. There is some evidence of experimentation with novel or unique ideas that would contribute positively to strategic thinking and decision making within an organisation. (38-50) The proposed strategy shows high degrees of feasibility, appropriateness, originality and/or creativity. Alternate, divergent, or contradictory perspectives are fully integrated. Creates and convincingly justifies a logical, coherent action plan based on selected alternatives. Creates an entirely new solution or idea that would be a highly valued contribution to strategic thinking and decision making within an organisation. Development of campaign materials (20/100 marks) (0-9) Demonstrates limited ability in identifying approaches for achieving the strategic goals. Proposes a solution that is ineffective, or only partially supports the strategy. Shows limited consideration of contextual factors. (10-12) Identifies a suitable approach for achieving the strategic goals. Proposes a solution that is ‘off the shelf’, rather than individually designed to address the specific contextual factors. Indicates basic comprehension of the methods’ strength and weaknesses. (13-14) Identifies and evaluates alternatives, and proposes one or more solutions that indicate good comprehension of the methods’ strength and weaknesses. Implements strategy in a manner that shows some sensitivity to contextual factors. (15-20) Identifies and evaluates multiple approaches, and proposes one or more solutions that indicate a deep comprehension of the methods’ strength and weaknesses. Thoroughly, deeply and effectively implements strategy in a manner that addresses multiple contextual factors. Organisation and presentation (10/100 marks) (0-4) Language choices are not appropriate for the target audience lack clarity, and/or do not support effective communication of key points. The text does not attempt to provide clear and consistent organisational patterns and structure in the presentation of content. References are not provided, or are only partially consistent with academic referencing guidelines. Does not adhere to general format, submission, and/or word-count guidelines. (5-6) Language choices are overall appropriate to the audience, but sometimes lack clarity, and only partially support effective communication of key points. Shows attention to the provision of clear and consistent organisational patterns and structure in the presentation of content, with few lapses. Uses appropriate headings to aid readability. Where necessary, provides references using appropriate style. Adheres to general format, submission, and word-count guidelines. (7-10) Language choices are appropriate for the target audience, clear, and support effective communication of key points. Shows evidence of clear and consistent organisational patterns and structure in the presentation of content. Uses appropriate headings throughout, to aid readability. Where necessary, provides references using appropriate style. Adheres to general format, submission, and word-count guidelines. TOTAL MARKS /100 Grade: Assignment 2b - The full recruitment and selection campaign Assessment Description For Assessment 2b, you will develop an entire recruitment and selection campaign, starting from workforce planning considerations and job analysis, through to recruitment, selection, appointment, and organisational socialisation of the successful applicant. You will submit a 2000-word report describing your strategy, and explaining why your strategy would be the most effective and appropriate to the selected context. You will also need to submit other relevant documents, including revised position description and specification, and recruitment materials developed in Assessment 2a, such as job advertisements. These supporting documents are excluded from the word count. For further information and detailed instructions, see the section below on Assessment instructions (How to complete this assessment). Assessment Aims This assessment task extends the work you did in Assessment 2a, as it includes all relevant steps in a recruitment and selection process. The campaign you design should provide clear guidance for the organisation’s recruitment team from the very beginning (job analysis) through to the appointment and organisational socialisation of the successful applicant. The focus of Assessment 2b, however, is on the selection, appointment, and organisational socialisation stages, although you will also need to factor in the workforce planning stage. Assessment Instructions (How to complete this assessment) Your task is to design an entire campaign to fill a vacancy, starting from defining the role, through to designing the onboarding of the recruited employee. The decisions you make throughout your campaign will be informed by your recruitment and selection strategy. You will outline and discuss your strategy in a 2000-word report. Your report