please focus onRACI,riskmanagement,timeestimation,reportingalso, refer to order id 29882 for the project assifnment 2
MNG00785 Assessment Task 3 Rubric Criteria Weight Scale 1 Scale 2 Scale 3 Scale 4 Scale 5 Description of situation 20% Description inadequate Description attempted, but lacks clarity or is verbose Description attempted but lacks clear Description is succinct and quite clear Description is succinct, clear and sophisticated Integration with theory 45% No connection to theory Connection to theory attempted but inadequate Demonstrates a basic understanding of how the theory relates to the situation Uses theory in a competent way to analyse the situation Uses theory in a sophisticated way to analyse the situation Logical reflective essay structure 20% No reflective structure; may focus more upon description than reflection; may not use theory Uses some semblance of a reflective structure Uses a basic reflective structure that connects experience with theory Uses a competent reflective structure that connects experience with at three theoretical resources Uses a sophisticated reflective structure that connects experience with at five or more theoretical resources References 15% References absent Some references present, but are not relevant (possible sham referencing) Some references present and relevant, and focus upon the Textbook, the PMBoK, and/or the MyReadings, but may contain significant errors References present and relevant, and focus upon the Textbook, the PMBoK, and/or the MyReadings, but may contain errors References accurate, present and relevant, and focus upon the Textbook, the PMBoK, and/or the MyReadings. Assessment 3: Reflective essay MyReflection A critical evaluation of your experience undertaking a project, with reference to theory. Introduction Engaging in critical evaluation This critical evaluation essay requires you to review your experience of undertaking a project – Assessment Task 2. It requires you to critically analyse your experience undertaking Assessment Task 2 in light of the theory we have discussed this session. You are required to critically evaluate how you and your team members did – or did not – utilise the project management tools that you have discovered this session. Task Critically discuss how your experience in Assessment Task 2 aligned (or did not align) with project management principles. Analyse your experience against at least three (3) knowledge areas. You may choose to use positive or negative experiences, although students tend to learn more from reflecting on negative experiences in a reflective essay. You will be expected to: • Introduce the essay • BRIEFLY describe the situation/s you are going to discuss • Link the experience to the theory we have discussed this session • Provide insight into how you engaged in, or contributed to, the situation • Provide insight, in light of what you have experienced and learned, into what you would do differently the next time you undertake a project • Conclude the essay You must refer to the literature and use at least three (3) different textbook or academic quality references. Marking criteria You will be marked on your ability to: • critically evaluate three (3) knowledge areas, identifying your own interaction and the interaction of others • integrate and reflect on personal experiences, collaborative learning processes and theory • use a logical structure, spelling, grammar, punctuation, and be within 10% of word count • use at least three references to support your discussion, using Harvard referencing