Please find the attached documents and please make sure all the rubrics and instructions are met properly!
Page 1 of 2 Final Project Name: Part I My Framework A. My Decision-Making Philosophy B. The Framework 1. Identify the ethical issue 2. Identify the morally significant beings 3. .. n. Conclusion Part II Code of Ethics Preamble Principles 1. Delete this prompt: Copy and paste the principle that you paired with Kant here To prove the principle ethical, the inverse of the principle will be proven unethical. Kant’s 1st and 2nd formulations Kant’s 1st formulation of his categorical imperative (Birsch, 2014; Kant, 2002, 1981; Lulis, 2017; Quinn, 2020) Principle: I will not …. Inverse of the principle: I will Maxim: Whenever I am in a situation where … I will. Universalized maxim: Whenever anyone ….. Argument: Conclusion: Kant’s 2nd formulation of his categorical imperative (Birsch, 2014; Lulis, 2017; Quinn, 2020) Principle: I will not …. Inverse of the principle: I will …. Argument: Conclusion: ccc Conclusion using Kant’s 1 & 2 formulations: Duties: The inverse of the principle was found unethical. As a result of this proof, it can be concluded that the original stated principle is ethical. 2. Delete this prompt: Copy and paste the principle that you paired with act & Rawls here To prove the principle ethical, the inverse of the principle will be proven unethical. Act utilitarian (Bentham, 2022; Birsch, 2014; HubPages Inc., 2003; Lulis, 2017; Quinn, 2020) Principle: Inverse of the principle: Units: Scale: Stakeholders: 1st Stakeholder remember to delete the red prompts Benefits Benefit #1: The intensity, or magnitude The duration, or how long the experience lasts: The certainty, or probability it will happen: The propinquity, or how close the experience is in space and time: The fecundity, or its ability to produce more experiences of the same kind: The purity, or extent to which pleasure is not diluted by pain: The extent, or number of people involved: As a result of the above argument, the impact (weight) of my being able to respond to people in real-time = ?... Costs Cost #1: The intensity, or magnitude The duration, or how long the experience lasts: The certainty, or probability it will happen: The propinquity, or how close the experience is in space and time: The fecundity, or its ability to produce more experiences of the same kind: The purity, or extent to which pleasure is not diluted by pain: The extent, or number of people involved: As a result of the above argument, the impact (weight) of my sustaining serious injury/death due to an accident I cause while texting and driving = ?...? Stakeholder #2 Benefits Costs Cost #1: The intensity, or magnitude The duration, or how long the experience lasts: The certainty, or probability it will happen: The propinquity, or how close the experience is in space and time: The fecundity, or its ability to produce more experiences of the same kind: The purity, or extent to which pleasure is not diluted by pain: The extent, or number of people involved: As a result of the above argument, the impact (weight) of my ….. = ?...? Conclusion: The net costs + net benefits = c1 + b1 + ….. = Rawls’s Theory of Justice (Birsch, 2014; Lulis, 2017; Rawls’s, 1971; Quinn, 2020) Principle: ... Inverse of the principle: ... 1. Each person may claim a “fully adequate” number of basic rights and liberties, so long as these claims are consistent with everyone else having a claim to the same rights and liberties. Argument: ... 2. Any social and economic inequalities must · Be associated with positions that everyone has a fair and equal opportunity to achieve · Be to the greatest benefit of the least-advantaged members of society (the difference principle) The inverse of the principle was found unethical. As a result of this proof, it can be concluded that the original stated principle is ethical. 3. Delete this prompt: Copy and paste the principle that you paired with rule here To prove the principle ethical, the inverse of the principle will be proven unethical. Rule utilitarian (Bentham, 2022; Birsch, 2014; HubPages Inc., 2003; Lulis, 2017; Quinn, 2020) Principle: ... Inverse of the principle: ... Rule: ... Universalized rule: ... Stakeholders in the large: ... ... ... Argument: ... Conclusion: ... The inverse of the principle was found unethical. As a result of this proof, it can be concluded that the original stated principle is ethical. 4. Delete this prompt: Copy and paste the principle that you paired with social contract here To prove the principle ethical, the inverse of the principle will be proven unethical. Social contract (Birsch, 2014; Friend, 2004; Lulis, 2017; Quinn, 2020) Principle: ... Inverse of the principle: ... The stakeholders and their rights: Me …… Argument & Conclusion: ... The inverse of the principle was found unethical. As a result of this proof, it can be concluded that the original stated principle is ethical. 5. Delete this prompt: Copy and paste the principle that you paired with virtue ethics here Virtue ethics (Aristotle, 2022; Birsch, 2014; Lulis, 2017; Quinn, 2020) Principle: ... Type of virtue: ... Argument and conclusion: ... 6. Delete this prompt: Copy and paste the principle that you paired with moral rights here To prove the principle ethical, the inverse of the principle will be proven unethical. Moral rights (Birsch, 2014; Lulis, 2017) To prove the principle ethical, the inverse of the principle will be proven unethical. Principle: ... Inverse of the principle: ... ... ... Argument (were relevant duty, or duties, fulfilled? Were rights violated?): ... Conclusion: The inverse of the principle was found unethical. As a result of this proof, it can be concluded that the original stated principle is ethical. 7. Delete this prompt: Copy and paste the principle that you paired with your framework here My framework: To prove the principle ethical, the inverse of the principle will be proven unethical. Principle: ... Inverse of the principle: ... The inverse of the principle was found unethical. As a result of this proof, it can be concluded that the original stated principle is ethical. References Aristotle. “Nicomachean ethics.” The Internet Classics Archive by Daniel C. Stevenson, Web Atomics. Trans. W. D. Ross. classics.mit.edu//Aristotle/nicomachaen.html Accessed January 2022. Bentham, J. “Introduction to the principles of morals and legislation.” Some Texts from Early Modern Philosophy. Peter Millican and Amyas Merivale. Annotated by Jonathan Bennett. www.earlymoderntexts.com/authors/bentham Accessed January 2022. Birsch, D. (2014) Introduction to ethical theories, a procedural approach. IL:Waveland Press, Inc. Friend, C. (2004). Social contract theory. (10 March 2013) Internet encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from http://www.iep.utm.edu/soc-cont/ HubPages Inc. (2003). Different types of modern utilitarianism. Retrieved from http://philanthropy2012.hubpages.com/hub/Different-TypesofModernUtilitarianism Kant, I. (1981). Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals with on a supposed right to lie because of philanthropic concerns, 3rd ed. (James W. Ellington Trans.). Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc. (Original work published 1785). Kant, I. (2002). Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals. (Allen W. Wood, Edited and Trans.). New Haven and London:Yale University Press. (Original work published 1785). Lulis, E. (2017). CTA example: applying the procedures. [Class handout]. School of Computing, DePaul University, Chicago, IL. Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice, by John Rawls, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Quinn, M. J. (2020) Ethics for the Information Age, 8th edition. NY:Pearson/Addison Wesley. Final Project Rubric Final Project Point Breakdown Item Points Writing Part 1a 25 points Organization 20 Part 1b 25 points Mechanics 20 Preamble 10 points Citing 20 Each principle 5 points each for a total = 35 Corrections 20 Each Application 25 points each for a total = 175 Total: 350 Final Project Rubric Needs Improvement Sufficient Above Average Part 1a The philosophy is not well-defined; missing parts. The Philosophy is well-defined. The philosophy is well-defined and well-focused. Relevant details enrich the work. Preamble Does not contain the necessary information. Provides only two of the required information items. Contains all necessary information (year in school, major, hobbies, employment) and is well-formulated. Part 1b The steps are vague and difficult to follow. The steps can be followed by anyone without having to ask the author questions. The procedure is clearly defined and flows naturally. Each Principle Does not address author’s personal use of computing, or is not an ethical issue. Does address author’s personal use of computing, and is an ethical issue. Meets the criteria (addresses own use of computing tech and is an ethical issue) and is concrete and simple stated. Each application The procedure is not applied correctly. There is a complete absence of relevant facts cited in the arguments that require facts, e.g., social contract and at utilitarian procedures. The procedure is applied correctly, but is disorganized; it is difficult to follow the logic. Less than four relevant facts cited in the arguments that require facts, e.g., social contract and at utilitarian procedures. The procedure is applied correctly, the logic flows, and argument insights enrich the work. Meaningful and relevant facts were researched and cited. Organization Information is poorly sequenced; did not maintain the formatting of the template. Information is present in a manner that can be followed, but not always easily. Information is presented in a logical sequence; the organization maintains the template and formatting specifications. Mechanics There are five or more spelling, or grammar, mistakes. There are less than firm spelling, or grammar, mistakes. Ter are no spelling or grammar mistakes. Citing Missing most in-text citations and not all new sources are placed in the Reference Sheet. Most sources cited correctly (in-text citations) and most of the new sources are placed in the Reference Sheet. Or all new sources are place din the Reference sheet, but not in the correct order.in the proper place. All sources cited correctly (in-text citations) and all new sources are placed in the Reference Sheet in the proper place. Corrections from Feedback on Parts 1, 2, & 3 More than three of the corrections from the feedback were not made. No more than three necessary corrections from feedback on Part 1, 2, & 3 were not made. All of the necessary corrections were made. Checklist for the Final Draft of the Final Project Submissions Checklist before submission: 1. Use the template as is do not change order of frameworks, change the frameworks, change the font, spacing, do not use bold, do not underline, etc. If you do not format your document correctly, I will not grade it. Note: all of your additions to the document are single spaced, properly indented as in the template, with 12pt Times New Roman black regular font. No highlighting or underlining. The Template uses APA formatting; do not change this. It is not an issue, as there are examples of all you need already in the template. 2. Make certain that you apply the frameworks correctly as we did in lab. ** The template provides the organization for your work. **The template indicates that you need to prove the inverse of the principle unethical in order to prove the principle ethical for all frameworks except virtue ethics. **You can review the document on using negative reasoning found Content | Week 6 | Using Negative Reasoning 3. Do not explain the applications, just apply the frameworks. 4. Do NOT explain the pairing of principles to frameworks as you did in Part 2. 4. Visit the Writing Center and remember: · Please format your proofs as we did in lab, so they are easy to read. Note the template does that for you. · Place each step in a separate paragraph so you do not have a run-on proof. · When drafting papers, each paragraph needs to be about one, or at most two, things. Each step in a framework needs it own paragraph. · Is the paper well organized? ·