home | many pasts | evidence | www.history | blackboard | reference talking history | syllabi | students | teachers | puzzle | about us Carnegie Speaks: A Recording of the Gospel of Wealth In his...

1 answer below »
Please answer the questions below and respond to a few peers for this assignment. Review the sources below these instructions carefully before answering the questions. Access the attachment(Source Analysis Questions)andtype your answers on the document. Use the word document provided to answer the questionswith the boxes, and use the 2 PDF to answer the questions for both of the resources.


home | many pasts | evidence | www.history | blackboard | reference talking history | syllabi | students | teachers | puzzle | about us Carnegie Speaks: A Recording of the Gospel of Wealth In his essay “Wealth,” published in the North American Review in 1889, industrialist Andrew Carnegie argued that individual capitalists were duty bound to play a broader cultural and social role and thus improve the world. Carnegie’s essay later became famous under the title “The Gospel of Wealth,” and in 1908, at age seventy-three, Andrew Carnegie recorded a portion of it under that title. (Click here to read the full text of the article.) Listen to Audio: Andrew Carnegie: I quote from the Gospel of Wealth published twenty-five years ago. This then is held to be the duty of the man of wealth. First: to set an example of modest, unostentatious living, shunning display; to provide moderately for the legitimate wants of those dependent upon him, and after doing so, to consider all surplus revenues which come to him simply as trust funds, which he is strictly bound as a matter of duty, to administer in the manner which in his judgment is best calculated to produce the most beneficial results for the community. The man of wealth must become a trustee and agent for his poorer brethren, bringing to their service his superior wisdom, experience, and ability to administer. Those who would administer wisely must indeed be wise. For one of the serious obstacles to the improvement of our race is indiscriminate charity. It were better for mankind that the millions of the rich were thrown into the sea than so spent as to encourage the slothful, the drunken, the unworthy. -00:00 http://historymatters.gmu.edu/ http://historymatters.gmu.edu/ http://historymatters.gmu.edu/browse/manypasts/ http://historymatters.gmu.edu/browse/makesense/ http://historymatters.gmu.edu/browse/wwwhistory/ http://historymatters.gmu.edu/browse/digblack/ http://historymatters.gmu.edu/browse/refdesk/ http://historymatters.gmu.edu/browse/talkhist/ http://historymatters.gmu.edu/browse/syllabus/ http://historymatters.gmu.edu/browse/studhist/ http://historymatters.gmu.edu/browse/secrets/ http://historymatters.gmu.edu/browse/puzzled/ http://historymatters.gmu.edu/credits.html javascript:document.my_keyword.submit() javascript:document.my_keyword.submit() http://historymatters.gmu.edu/search.php http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/5767 In bestowing charity, the main consideration should be to help those who help themselves. It provides part of the means by which those who desire to improve may do so; to give to those who desire to rise the aids by which they may rise; to assist but rarely or never to do all. He is the only true reformer who is careful and as anxious not to lead the unworthy as he is to lead the worthy, and perhaps even more so, for in alms giving, more injury may be done by promoting vice than by relieving virtue. Thus, is the problem of the rich and poor to be solved. The laws of accumulation should be left free; the laws of distribution free. Individualism will continue. But the millionaire will be but a trustee for the poor; entrusted for a season with a part of the increased wealth of the community, but administering it for the community far better than it did, or would have done, of itself. The best in minds will thus have reached a stage in the development of the race in which it is clearly seen that there is no mode of disposing of surplus wealth creditable to thoughtful and earnest men into whose hands it flows save by using it year-by-year for the general good. This day already dawns. Men may die without incurring the pity of their fellows, sharers in great business enterprises from which their capital cannot be, or has not been withdrawn, upon which is left entirely a trust for public uses. Yet the day is not far distant when the man who dies, leaving behind him millions of available wealth, which was free for him to administer during life, will pass away “unwept, unhonored, and unsung,” no matter to what use he leaves the dross which he cannot take with him. Of such as these, the public verdict will then be: the man who dies thus rich, dies disgraced. Such in my opinion is the true gospel concerning wealth, obedience to which is destined someday to solve the problems of the rich and the poor, to hasten the coming brotherhood of man, and at last to make our earth a heaven. Source: Courtesy of the Michigan State University Voice Library. See Also:The Gospel According to Andrew: Carnegie's Hymn to Wealth http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/5767 home | many pasts | evidence | www.history | blackboard | reference talking history | syllabi | students | teachers | puzzle | about us Upton Sinclair Hits His Readers in the Stomach In 1904, in the midst of a bitter stockyard strike, socialist writer Upton Sinclair’s two- month visit to Chicago’s “Packingtown” area provided him with a wealth of material that he turned into his best-selling novel, The Jungle. The book is best known for revealing the unsanitary process by which animals became meat products. Yet Sinclair’s primary concern was not with the goods that were produced, but with the workers who produced them. Throughout the book, as in this chapter, he described with great accuracy the horrifying physical conditions under which immigrant packing plant workers and their families worked and lived, portraying the collapse of immigrant culture under the relentless pressure of industrial capitalism. Despite his sympathies, as a middle-class reformer Sinclair was oblivious to the vibrancy of immigrant communities beyond the reach of bosses, where immigrants found solidarity and hope. Sinclair’s graphic descriptions of how meat products were manufactured were an important factor in the subsequent passage of the federal Pure Food and Drug and Meat Inspection Act in 1906. Sinclair later commented about the effect of his novel: "I aimed at the public’s heart and by accident hit its stomach." Jurgis heard of these things little by little, in the gossip of those who were obliged to perpetrate them. It seemed as if every time you met a person from a new department, you heard of new swindles and new crimes. There was, for instance, a Lithuanian who was a cattle-butcher for the plant where Marija had worked, which killed meat for canning only; and to hear this man describe the animals which came to his place would have been worth while for a Dante or a Zola. It seemed that they must have agencies all over the country, to hunt out old and crippled and diseased cattle to be canned. There were cattle which had been fed on “whiskey-malt,” the refuse of the breweries, and had become what the men called “steerly”—which means covered with boils. It was a nasty job killing these, for when you plunged your knife into them they would burst and http://historymatters.gmu.edu/ http://historymatters.gmu.edu/ http://historymatters.gmu.edu/browse/manypasts/ http://historymatters.gmu.edu/browse/makesense/ http://historymatters.gmu.edu/browse/wwwhistory/ http://historymatters.gmu.edu/browse/digblack/ http://historymatters.gmu.edu/browse/refdesk/ http://historymatters.gmu.edu/browse/talkhist/ http://historymatters.gmu.edu/browse/syllabus/ http://historymatters.gmu.edu/browse/studhist/ http://historymatters.gmu.edu/browse/secrets/ http://historymatters.gmu.edu/browse/puzzled/ http://historymatters.gmu.edu/credits.html javascript:document.my_keyword.submit() javascript:document.my_keyword.submit() http://historymatters.gmu.edu/search.php splash foul-smelling stuff into your face; and when a man’s sleeves were smeared with blood, and his hands steeped in it, how was he ever to wipe his face, or to clear his eyes so that he could see? It was stuff such as this that made the “embalmed beef” that had killed several times as many United States soldiers as all the bullets of the Spaniards; only the army beef, besides, was not fresh canned, it was old stuff that had been lying for years in the cellars. Then one Sunday evening, Jurgis sat puffing his pipe by the kitchen stove, and talking with an old fellow whom Jonas had introduced, and who worked in the canning-rooms at Durham’s; and so Jurgis learned a few things about the great and only Durham canned goods, which had become a national institution. They were regular alchemists at Durham’s; they advertised a mushroom-catsup, and the men who made it did not know what a mushroom looked like. They advertised “potted chicken,”—and it was like the boarding-house soup of the comic papers, through which a chicken had walked with rubbers on. Perhaps they had a secret process for making chickens chemically—who knows? said Jurgis’s friend; the things that went into the mixture were tripe, and the fat of pork, and beef suet, and hearts of beef, and finally the waste ends of veal, when they had any. They put these up in several grades, and sold them at several prices; but the contents of the cans all came out of the same hopper. And then there was “potted game” and “potted grouse,” "potted ham,“ and ”devilled ham“—de-vyled, as the men called it. ”De-vyled“ ham was made out of the waste ends of smoked beef that were too small to be sliced by the machines; and also tripe, dyed with chemicals so that it would not show white; and trimmings of hams and corned beef; and potatoes, skins and all; and finally the hard cartilaginous gullets of beef, after the tongues had been cut out. All this ingenious mixture was ground up and flavored with spices to make it taste like something. Anybody who could invent a new imitation had been sure of a fortune from old Durham, said Jurgis’s informant; but it was hard to think of anything new in a place where so many sharp wits had been at work for so long; where men welcomed tuberculosis in the cattle they were feeding, because it made them fatten more quickly; and where they bought up all the old rancid butter left over in the grocery-stores of a continent, and ”oxidized" it by a forced-air process, to take away the odor, rechurned it with skim-milk, and sold it in bricks in the cities! Up to a year or two ago it had been the custom to kill horses in the yards—ostensibly for fertilizer; but after long agitation the newspapers had been able to make the public realize that the horses were being canned. Now it was against the law to kill horses in Packingtown, and the law was really complied with—for the present, at any rate. Any day, however, one might see sharp- horned and shaggy-haired creatures running with the sheep—and yet what a job you would have to get the public to believe that a good part of what it buys for lamb and mutton is really goat’s flesh! There was another interesting set of statistics that a person might have gathered in Packingtown—those of the various afflictions of the workers. When Jurgis had first inspected the packing-plants with Szedvilas, he had marvelled while he listened to the tale of all the things that were made out of the carcasses of animals, and of all the lesser industries that were maintained there; now he found that each one of these lesser industries was a separate little inferno, in its way as horrible as the killing-beds, the source and fountain of them all. The workers in each of them had their own peculiar diseases. And the wandering visitor might be sceptical
Answered Same DayOct 19, 2021

Answer To: home | many pasts | evidence | www.history | blackboard | reference talking history | syllabi |...

Bichitrananda answered on Oct 21 2021
149 Votes
Source Analysis Questions
    What kind of sources are these?
Are these paintings, photographs, diary excerpts, newspaper articles, v
ideos, etc.? Are the sources primary or secondary? Why or how do you know this? Please explain your answer and provide some examples.
 The sources provided here are an essay “Wealth” written by Andrew Carnegie that was published in the North American Review and a chapter from the novel “Jungle” by Upton Sinclair. The Novel “Jungle” by Upton Sinclair is a primary source since it was information collected during his time spent in Packingtown, a city in Chicago and the information he gathered about the meat industry and the packing was from actual workers and people who handled various functions such as canning, packing, wool pluckers, beef luggers, etc. The Essay by Andrew Carnegie is a secondary source since it doesn’t have information collected by first-hand sources but rather an analysis of the lives of the wealthy and his opinion regarding this. (Carnegie,1889) An example of this is a line from the essay “The man of wealth must become a trustee and agent from for his poor brethren, bringing to their service his superior wisdom, experience and ability to administer himself.”
 
    Do the sources have a purpose/agenda? Who or What do you think is missing?
Are the sources...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here