Plaintiffs owned a piece of lakeside property. The land was subsequently rezoned to prohibit high-density apartment complexes and restrict the use of the property to single-family dwellings. On what...

Plaintiffs owned a piece of lakeside property. The land was subsequently rezoned to prohibit high-density apartment complexes and restrict the use of the property to single-family dwellings. On what basis would the plaintiffs claim that their constitutional rights had been violated by the zoning change? Would they be correct?