Part II: Dynamic Partitioning Operating system Operating system Operating system Operating system 8M Process Process20M 20M Process 1 20M 56M Process 2 14M Process 2 14M 36M Process 3 18M 22M 4M (a)...

Extracted text: Part II: Dynamic Partitioning Operating system Operating system Operating system Operating system 8M Process Process20M 20M Process 1 20M 56M Process 2 14M Process 2 14M 36M Process 3 18M 22M 4M (a) (b) (e) (d) Operating system Operating system Operating system Operating system Process 2 14M Process I 20M Process I 20M 20M 6M Process 4SM Process 4KM Process 4 8M 6M 6M 6M Process 3 18M Process 3 18M Process 3 18M Process 3 18M 4M 4M (e) Figure 2. Aseauencesf.memonvallocation sf fourerocesses. implementing the dyramic paritioning tecbnique- 64MB memov. Questions: 4. What do you think is the possible reason why Process 2 was pulled/swapped out (e) of the memory? 5. When Process 1 finishes the execution (g) and Process 2 is swapped back in the memory (h), what possible condition or phenomenon can occur within the memory? Rationalize your answer. 6. If you are to develop a file management system, would you suggest the implementation of the dynamic partitioning technique in memory management? Why or why not?


Extracted text: Part I: Fixed Partitioning Operating system Operating system 8M 8M 2M SM 4M 6M 8M 8M SM 8M 8M 12M 8M 8M 16M 8M (b) Unequal-size partitions Figure 1. An illustration of fxed partitioning with an (a) equal and (b) UDegual sized memory partitions - 64MB memory. (a) Equal-size partitions Questions: 1. Which partitioning setup could possibly reduce internal fragmentation and how? Based on the two partitioning setup above, would you recommend the implementation of the fixed partitioning technique in developing automated machines? Why or why not? 3. In your perspective, what ace the possible downside of utilizing an equaly sized memory partitions? Rationalize your answer. 2.