Part C
- Use the evidence you have in part A and the ideas you shared in part B and create a poster!
- This poster unlike parts A and B is for the general population and will go towards initiating change a paradigm shift.
- Consider stigma, sensitivity, morals, and ethics.
- Each student must share their poster and provide a 3-minute verbal presentation of their content and rationale
Example of a policy proposal in below link. You will be creating a similar framework with this assessment.
Example of a policy proposal
Part A - Evidence and rationale or a barrier and why it exists
Part B - How you plan on implementing it with rationale
Part C - Is the combination of the two presented to the general population (You never know who is in the audience!).
*Your policy recommendations need to be rigorously researched, evidence-based, with realistic,and achievable suggestions that align with the current primary health and social care systems.
14/08/2021 Preview Rubric: Assessment 3 Rubric - (HHB1204) Australian Health and Social Care Systems and Policy - S - Victoria University https://vucollaborate.vu.edu.au/d2l/common/dialogs/nonModal/blank.d2l?d2l_body_type=1&d2l_nonModalDialog_cb=previewRubric_0692671610… 1/3 Assessment 3 Rubric Course: (HHB1204) Australian Health and Social Care Systems and Policy - S Criteria High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Not satisfactory Criterion Score Clarity of the poster message. / 20 Poster design is culturally appropriate , without creating Stigma. / 20 20 points Outstanding 17 points Poster has a clean and simple layout that demonstrates good poster design principles. Poster can ‘stand-alone’, its message is immediately apparent 12 points Poster layout reinforces the message and mostly conforms to good poster design principles (some graphics or special effects distract from the message). Poster requires some clarification during audio 6 points Poster layout is difficult to view, layout is cluttered and/or confusing. Po ster message is unclear despite elaboration during audio 0 points Not satisfactory 20 points Outstanding 17.07 points Incorporates culturally appropriate images and language recognising diversity of the sub- population. 12 points Incorporates mostly culturally appropriate images and language with some recognition of diversity of the sub- population. 6 points Limited evidence of attempts to incorporate culturally appropriate images and language with minimal recognition of diversity of the sub- population. 0 points Not satisfactory. 14/08/2021 Preview Rubric: Assessment 3 Rubric - (HHB1204) Australian Health and Social Care Systems and Policy - S - Victoria University https://vucollaborate.vu.edu.au/d2l/common/dialogs/nonModal/blank.d2l?d2l_body_type=1&d2l_nonModalDialog_cb=previewRubric_0692671610… 2/3 Criteria High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Not satisfactory Criterion Score Audio presentatio n. / 15 Specific, Measurable , Achievable, Realistic, and Timely recommend ations aimed at the target population. / 15 Poster demonstrat es research of current policy and barriers are clear and well represented . / 10 15 points Excellent message that is clear, articulate and aligns with poster. 12.8 points Good message that is clear, articulate and aligns with poster. 9 points Adequate message that is clear, articulate and aligns with poster. 4.5 points Not a clear message and does not align with poster. 0 points Not satisfactory. 15 points Excellent suggestions that are Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, and Timely recommendati ons aimed at the target population. 12.8 points Good suggestions that are Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, and Timely recommendati ons aimed at the target population. 9 points Adequate suggestions that are Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, and Timely recommendati ons aimed at the target population. 4.5 points Recommendat ions have not been thoroughly considered and researched. 0 points Not satisfactory. 10 points Excellent research of current policy and barriers are clear and well represented. 8 points Good research of current policy and barriers are clear and well represented. 6 points Adequate research of current policy and barriers are clear and well represented. 4 points research of current policy and barriers is not adequate. 0 points Not satisfactory. 14/08/2021 Preview Rubric: Assessment 3 Rubric - (HHB1204) Australian Health and Social Care Systems and Policy - S - Victoria University https://vucollaborate.vu.edu.au/d2l/common/dialogs/nonModal/blank.d2l?d2l_body_type=1&d2l_nonModalDialog_cb=previewRubric_0692671610… 3/3 Total / 100 Overall Score Criteria High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Not satisfactory Criterion Score Effective planning that demonstrat es, a clear and cohesive plan that demonstrat es the relevant parts of Part A that aligns with Part B and comes together is Part C. / 2020 points Excellent, planning that demonstrates, a clear and cohesive plan that demonstrates the relevant parts of Part A that aligns with Part B and comes together in Part C. 16 points Good, planning that demonstrates, a clear and cohesive plan that demonstrates the relevant parts of Part A that aligns with Part B and comes together in Part C. 13.3 points Cohesive planning that demonstrates, a clear plan that demonstrates the relevant parts of Part A that aligns with Part B and comes together in Part C. 8 points Non cohesive planning that does not demonstrates, a clear plan demonstrating the relevant parts of Part A that aligns with Part B and comes together in Part C. 0 points Not satisfactory. High Distinction 80 points minimum Distinction 70 points minimum Credit 60 points minimum Pass 50 points minimum Not Satisfactory 0 points minimum Veterans 000 Australian Veteransliving with a mental healthcondition in 2018-2019(Department of Veterans’ Affairs, 2019) of the Veteran Populationhas a mental health disorder(Van Hooff et al., 2014). Open Arms creates access formany veterans seeking mentalhealth services, yet they donot directly aim to reducestigmas and barriers to care(Open Arms-Veterans & FamiliesCounselling, 2019). The self reported stigmas toaccessing care for mentalhealth disorders: 6%-Harm to career 9%-Being treated differently 0%-Being perceived asweak(Department ofDefence, 2010, p. xxix). The self-reported barriers toaccessing healthcare 9%-Reduced deployability, 1%-Difficulty getting timeoff work 0%-Not knowing where toaccess help (Department of Defence, 2010, p. xxix). Mentors givepresentations to currentserving AustralianDefenceforce membersto promote early accessto mental health services Increase early access tohealthcare to reduce long termmental health disorders Review each objective throughsurveys given either yearly orpost interaction. Evaluate program after threeyears post implementation. Mentors also meet withcurrent and past servingmembers to discusscourse of action andadequate referral Ensuring confidentiality ishighly important to alsoensure current barriers toaccessing mentalhealthcare do not apply toaccessing the mentors MentalHealthStatus CurrentPolicyGaps Stigmas toAccessingCare AccessBarriers toCare Objective 1:Reduce Stigmas& Barriers FutureProjections Objective 2:Quality Support& Referral Objective 3:Confidentiality Aims to break down stigmas andbarriers to access ProposedMental HealthMentor Program Name Current Snapshot Mentor program References: Department of Defence. (2010).Mental Health in the Australian Defence Force: 2010 ADF Mental Health Prevalence and Wellbeing Study Report, p. 2. Open Arms-Veterans & Families Counselling. (2019, November 22).Open Arms-Veterans & Families Counselling.Openarms.Gov.Au.https://www.openarms.gov.au/ VanHooff, M., McFarlane, A. C., Davies, C. E., Searle, A. K., Fairweather-Schmidt, A. K.,Verhagen, A.,Benassi, H., & Hodson, S. E. (2014). The AustralianDefenceForce Mental Health Prevalence and Wellbeing Study: design and methods.European Journal ofPsychotraumatology,5(1), 23950.https://doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v5.23950