Part B: Business Process Improvement Report
♦ Review All modules; ♦ Familiarise with reflection report writing style.
In continuum of Part A, students are required to compile a personal reflection report. The report should incorporate the feedback from cohort on Part A presentation, and personal learning journey through this subject. Output:
The BPI Reflection report should cover: ♦ Brief description of the case study and comments from Part A; ♦ Review and Analysis on the feedback from the cohort; ♦ Individual learning journey through the subject. Can follow “Before, During, After” or “What, So What, Now What” format; ♦ Other personal thinking and feeling
Microsoft Word - PROJ6009 Assessment 2 Brief July 2018.docx PROJ 6009 Assessment 1 Brief July 2018 Page 1 of 7 ASSESSMENT BRIEF - 2 Subject Code and Title PROJ6009 Business Process Management and Systems Assessment Assessment 2: Business Process Improvement Reflection (2 parts) ♦ Part A: Presentation: Comments on Best Practice of BPI Case study ♦ Part B: Reflection Report: Best Practice of BPI case study (Incorporating the feedback from the cohort) Individual/Group Individual and/or Group for both Online and Face-to-Face delivery Words limits Part A: 8-10 minutes (Group presentation) Part B: 1000 words (Individual reflection report) Learning Outcomes 1. Critically analyse the role of management information systems in sustaining successful organisations. 2. Critically evaluate approaches to business process management and systems, their associated risks and implementation processes. 3. Establish and justify governance processes for business process management change to ensure that all stakeholders are considered in technology change decisions Submission Part A: By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday end of Module 4 Part B: By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday end of Week 11 (First half of Module 6) Weighting 40% (Part A: 20%; Part B: 20%) Total Marks 40 (20 marks for each part) Context: This assessment is to evaluate students’ critical thinking and analytical skills, as well as public speaking and personal reflection. The assessment requests students to deliver a presentation in class or via a teleconference, and provide a commentary on a selected Business Process Improvement (BPI) case study. Feedback from the cohort must be collected, analysed and incorporated in the personal reflection report, which is the second part of the assessment. PROJ 6009 Assessment 1 Brief July 2018 Page 2 of 7 Instructions: In this assessment, the students will begin with reading a selective case study of Business Process Improvement practice, which is issued during Module 3 study. This assessment contains TWO parts. To prepare for this assessment: Part A: Presentation: Comments on Best Practice of BPI Case study • Review Modules 1, 2, 3 and 4; • In a team of 4 people, intensively read the case study and conduct extra research when necessary; • Coordinate with team members to design, prepare and rehearse the presentation; Output: ♦ Maximum 10 slides, 8 -10 mins presentation delivered in class or via a teleconference; ♦ Critical analysis and evaluation on the BPI practice of the case study; ♦ All team members should be presenting and sharing the workload equally; ♦ Actively listen and provide feedback on other teams’ presentation. Part B: Business Process Improvement Report ♦ Review All modules; ♦ Familiarise with reflection report writing style. In continuum of Part A, students are required to compile a personal reflection report. The report should incorporate the feedback from cohort on Part A presentation, and personal learning journey through this subject. Output: The BPI Reflection report should cover: ♦ Brief description of the case study and comments from Part A; ♦ Review and Analysis on the feedback from the cohort; ♦ Individual learning journey through the subject. Can follow “Before, During, After” or “What, So What, Now What” format; ♦ Other personal thinking and feeling. PROJ 6009 Assessment 1 Brief July 2018 Page 3 of 7 Learning Rubrics – Assessment 1 Part A: Business Process Improvement Presentation Assessment Attributes Fail (0-49) Pass (50-64) Credit (65-74) Distinction (75-84) High Distinction (85-100) Presentation Contents and Structure: 50% Limited amount of information obtained from the case study; No data used to support the commentary; No analysis, justification or evaluation presented; No logical connection of BPM and BPI knowledge and tools in the presentation; Poor presentation structure or organisation Reasonable amount of information obtained from the case study; Some data used to support the commentary; Limited analysis and evaluation presented; Limited connection of BPM and BPI knowledge and tools in the presentation; Acceptable organisation of the contents and structure. Good amount of information obtained from the case study; Reasonable data used to support the commentary; Good analysis and evaluation presented; Good connection of BPM and BPI knowledge and tools in the presentation; Well structured contents, easy to follow; Good opening, topics and opinions stated with a conclusive ending; Accurate information obtained from the case study; Specific and appropriate data and evidence used to support the commentary; Comprehensive analysis, critique, justification and evaluation presented Strong connection and utilisation of BPM and BPI knowledge and tools in the presentation; Clearly structured contents, using agenda, heading, easy to follow; Strong opening, clear topics and opinions stated with a conclusive ending; Extra research conducted and demonstrated through valid sources. Solid and accurate information obtained from the case study; Specific and appropriate data and evidence used to support the commentary; Comprehensive and in-depth analysis, critique and justification presented with none-bias evaluation; Strong connection and utilisation of BPM and BPI knowledge and tools in the presentation; Clearly structured contents, using agenda, heading, sub-headings, easy to follow; Strong opening, clear topics and opinions stated with a conclusive ending; Extra research conducted and demonstrated through valid sources. PROJ 6009 Assessment 1 Brief July 2018 Page 4 of 7 Presentation delivery and Q&A: 30% Presentation was incomplete and no connection with audiences; Contents are patricianly delivered, key parts are missed; Limited language used, verbal communication lack of coherent; NO visual aids use; NO answers to questions. Presentation was completed and some connection with audiences; Contents are patricianly delivered, some missing parts; Use simple and straightforward language; Basic visual aids use, not fully support the presentation; Limited answers to questions, with incorrect information. Smooth presentation and some connection with audiences; Contents are delivered in a logical and sensible manner; Use understandable and straightforward language; Use visual aids to support delivery; Partially answered questions nicely, provide reasonable explanation Presenters demonstrated good confidence and connection with audiences, including body languages and eye contact; Contents are delivered in a logical cohesive, and sensible manner; Use engaging, professional and straightforward language; Use various types of visual aids to support delivery, incorporating with available technologies. Handled questions nicely, provide simple and good explanation. Presenters demonstrated a great deal of confidence and strong connection with audiences, including body languages and eye contact; Contents are delivered in a logical cohesive, and sensible manner; Use engaging, professional and straightforward language, well explained on technical terminologies; Appropriately use various types of visual aids to support delivery, incorporating with available technologies. Handle questions with confidence, provide simple and proper answers with justification Constructive feedback to peers: 20% No useful feedback provided Limited support and encouragement demonstrated; Lack of awareness of and sensitivity to diversity amongst peers Offers some feedback, not specific or constructive; No articulation between contents and BPI; random comments Basic support and encouragement demonstrated; Lack of awareness of and sensitivity to diversity amongst peers Offers some constructive feedback, specific and appropriate; Reasonable articulation between contents and BPI; Feedback communicated to peers with support and encouraging manner Demonstrates some awareness of and sensitivity to diversity amongst peers Offers detailed constructive feedback, specific and appropriate; Articulated the presentation contents and BPI, effectively communicates them to peers; Provides good assistance, support, and encouragement to peers; Demonstrates a good level of awareness of and sensitivity to diversity amongst peers. Actively offers detailed constructive feedback, specific and appropriate; Expertly articulated the presentation contents and BPI, effectively communicates them to peers. Provides excellent assistance, support, and encouragement to peers. Consistently demonstrates a high level of awareness of and sensitivity to diversity amongst peers. PROJ 6009 Assessment 1 Brief July 2018 Page 5 of 7 Learning Rubrics – Assessment 1 Part B: Business Process Improvement Reflection Report Assessment Attributes Fail (0-49) Pass (50-64) Credit (65-74) Distinction (75-84) High Distinction (85-100) Description of case study and key elements of commentary. 20% NO description of the case study; Limited information provided from the commentary on BPI practice; NO evidence presented. Brief description of the case study, covered some key elements; Some information provided from the commentary on BPI practice; Limited evidence presented. Good description of the case study, covered some key elements; Highlight the outcomes of BPI on organisation; Reasonable amount of information provided from the commentary on