Part 2 requirements (1 000 words maximum):
The financial statements for the year ending 30 June 2019 for the economic entity have been prepared on the basis of your journals from Part 1. These statements have been presented to the Board of Directors, who have asked the followingquestions:
(a)What is the advantage of making the consolidation adjustment entries prepared in Part1?
(400 wordsmaximum)
(b)Management have not undertaken any revaluation of non-current assets since the acquisition of the subsidiary, arguing revaluations are optional and will be undertaken at some time in the future when the total non-current assets increase in value. Do you agree with thisapproach?
(600 words maximum)
Your task is to prepare a response to the abovequestions.
You need to use authoritative, relevant references and relevant Accounting Standards and the AASB Framework to help support your argument. However, remember your audience (senior management) are not accountants, so you need to use this information to support your argument (e.g. don’t just quote large sections of the standards, as the managers won’t readit!).
Note: youmustmake reference to relevant paragraphs of the Accounting Standards and AASB Framework and to other sources of material. When referencing both the Accounting Standards and the AASB Framework, include the relevant paragraph number (eg: AASB101, para.137(a) or AASB Framework, para.3).