Page 1 of 5 XXXXXXXXXXHA3032 AUDITING - GROUP ASSIGNMENT – T1, 2021 HOLMES INSTITUTE FACULTY OF HIGHER EDUCATION Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines Trimester T1 2021 Unit Code HA3032 Unit...

1 answer below »
file


Page 1 of 5 HA3032 AUDITING - GROUP ASSIGNMENT – T1, 2021 HOLMES INSTITUTE FACULTY OF HIGHER EDUCATION Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines Trimester T1 2021 Unit Code HA3032 Unit Title Auditing Assessment Type Group Assignment Assessment Title “Developing an Audit Program for a selected publicly listed Company” Purpose of the assessment (with ULO Mapping) Students are required to: 1.1- Identify and distinguish between tests of controls, substantive tests of transactions and substantive tests of balances. 1.2- Identify and understand when the auditor will undertake substantive audit procedures in response to specific assessed risks of material misstatement. 1.3- Understand how assertions relate to account balances 1.4- Understand how to select the most efficient and effective combination of audit procedures that allows them to achieve the audit objective 1.5– Active participation in an “audit team context” with professional group discussions The following Unit Learning Outcomes are applicable: 1. Demonstrate a thorough understanding of the reporting requirements of auditing standards relating to auditors’ reports. 2. Explain how the audit planning process directs the auditor to obtain adequate evidence to support audit findings and address the importance of materiality in an audit; 3. Explain the process of audit planning to determine risk assessments and an overall audit strategy; 4. Explain the auditors’ obligations with regards to understanding the client’s business and internal controls, and assessing business risks. 5. Achieve a high level of competence in applying prescribed auditing techniques in gathering evidence to satisfy audit assertions. Weight 40% of the total assessment Total Marks 40 Marks Word limit Maximum 3,000 – 3,500 words Due Date Week 10 Page 2 of 5 HA3032 AUDITING - GROUP ASSIGNMENT – T1, 2021 Guidelines on Submission • All work must be submitted on Blackboard by the due date along with a completed Holmes Institute Assignment Cover Page. • The assignment must be in MS Word format, single spacing, 12-pt Arial font and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings and page numbers. • Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using Harvard referencing style. Adapted Harvard Referencing Holmes has now implemented a revised Harvard approach to referencing: 1. Reference sources in assignments are limited to sources which provide full text access to the source’s content for lecturers and markers. 2. The Reference list should be located on a separate page at the end of the essay and titled: References. 3. It should include the details of all the in-text citations, arranged alphabetically A-Z by author surname. In addition, it MUST include a hyperlink to the full text of the cited reference source. For example; P Hawking, B McCarthy, A Stein (2004), Second Wave ERP Education, Journal of Information Systems Education, Fall, http://jise.org/Volume15/n3/JISEv15n3p327.pdf 4. All assignments will require additional in-text reference details which will consist of the surname of the author/authors or name of the authoring body, year of publication, page number of contents, paragraph where the content can be found. For example; “The company decided to implement an enterprise wide data warehouse business intelligence strategies (Hawking et al, 2004, p3(4)).” Non - Adherence to Referencing Guidelines Where students do not follow the above guidelines: 1. Students who submit assignments which do not comply with the guidelines may be required to resubmit their assignments or incur penalties for inadequate referencing. 2. Late penalties will apply per day after a student or group has been notified of a resubmission requirements. • Students whose citations are fake will be reported for academic misconduct http://jise.org/Volume15/n3/JISEv15n3p327.pdf Page 3 of 5 HA3032 AUDITING - GROUP ASSIGNMENT – T1, 2021 HA3032 Auditing – Group Assignment Specifications Purpose: The aim of this group assignment is to provide you with an opportunity to design a “risk- based” audit program for a real-world company and focus on the “Substantive tests of balances”, which involves substantiating the ending balance of an account(s), which is comprised of multiple transactions, as at a certain year-end date. Students are also required to research the applicable accounting and auditing standards depending on the material account balances selected. Assignment Requirements and Structure 1. Students are required to form groups of 4 students group members by completing the “HA3032 Group Form details”. 2. Each group of students group have been provided by unit coordinator, a unique ASX listed company to use for progressive analysis in this group assignment. 3. Prepare a detailed audit program Report [3,000-3500 words] for the client/company in a group of 4 students. Students must use a Report Format with an Executive Summary and Table of Contents. 4. Use publicly available online resources for research purposes, such as: The Accounting and Auditing standards, which are available from government-based websites. *Note: Students are required to form and self-enrol into groups – a maximum of 4 students per group. You will not be able to submit your group assignment unless you are OFFICIALLY enrolled into a designated group in Blackboard (even if it is a solo-group of 1). Submit the group assignment as a single document, including the Holmes official COVER SHEET. Once formed, the group membership should not be changed for the duration of the trimester. For help with any group assignment matters, please address your email to [email protected] ensuring that your full details (Name, student ID, unit name and number) are included. Detail Assignment Tasks: Developing an Audit Program for a listed ASX Company 1. Gain an understanding of the nature of the entity and its industry and then identify key business risks. After this is completed, assess where the risks of material mis- statements could be in the financial report. Consider the factors affecting both Inherent Risk and Control Risk. Finally, apply the Audit Risk Model [AR = f (IR, CR, DR)] to the selected company. Which risk rating would you apply (Low, Medium or High) to the company’s inherent risk assessment and control risk assessment? How does this affect your assessment of Detection Risk and Audit Risk? 2. Perform analytical procedures of the Statement of Financial Position and of Financial Performance over the last three years using appropriate ratios and/or metrics. Select four key ratios and provide a brief explanation in the report. This should be presented in a table format. 3. Discuss with your group members which account balances are considered “material”. Explain how you calculated materiality for planning purposes and provide appropriate justification for your decision-making. (Note - Use a table format to structure your answers to questions 4, 5, 6, 7 & 8) 4. Select up to ten different material account balances, at least five assets and five liabilities. 5. For each material account balance selected, list the relevant financial report assertions and explain why the selected assertions are applicable to each account. mailto:[email protected] Page 4 of 5 HA3032 AUDITING - GROUP ASSIGNMENT – T1, 2021 6. Design a comprehensive set of audit work steps for each material account balance, which addresses the selected assertions and which will result in sufficient and appropriate audit evidence being collected for your selected client company. (Note - Assume that a predominantly substantive approach is being adopted). Consider which standards are appropriate. 7. Include a sampling plan, which details how you will use sampling for each material account balance to be tested. How many items will be tested for each test? 8. Refer to some or all of the following websites for further information and research processes: http://www.auasb.gov.au/Home, http://www.asic.gov.au/, www.cpaaustralia.com.au, http://www.ifrs.org, 9. Holmes Online Resources Holmes has also provided students with an online resources hub. Students can use the following link to access the Holmes Open Education Resources Web Site: https://www.studyresources.holmes.edu.au/ Group Assignment Report - Marking Criteria Weighting % Key Business Risk Identification 4 10% Audit Risk Model – Assessment of Inherent Risk, Control Risk, Detection Risk 4 10% Analytical Review of the selected company, including ratio analysis in a table 4 10% Material Account Balance Identification (Minimum 5 x Assets and 5 x Liabilities) 10 25% Assertions identified – Correct Assertions are stated and explanations are noted 4 10% Audit Program – Audit work steps / procedures are clearly stated and listed. 10 25% Sampling Plan for each material account balance with samples sizes. 4 10% Weight 40 Marks 100% http://www.auasb.gov.au/Home http://www.auasb.gov.au/Home http://www.auasb.gov.au/Home http://www.auasb.gov.au/Home http://www.asic.gov.au/ http://www.asic.gov.au/ http://www.asic.gov.au/ http://www.asic.gov.au/ http://www.asic.gov.au/ http://www.asic.gov.au/ http://www.cpaaustralia.com.au/ http://www.cpaaustralia.com.au/
Answered 7 days AfterMay 15, 2021HA3032

Answer To: Page 1 of 5 XXXXXXXXXXHA3032 AUDITING - GROUP ASSIGNMENT – T1, 2021 HOLMES INSTITUTE FACULTY OF...

Harshit answered on May 22 2021
145 Votes
Executive Summary
This report depicts the aftereffects of our review of Australian examining organizations in the year and covers the yearly budget summaries for the period from December 31, 2020. The review work centres around inspecting the budget reports of public interest substances as per the Stock Company Act. The reason for this review association's examination plan is to help improve and keep up review quality. The review helps out the organization to accomplish this goal. Considering the organization's endeavours to improve the quality and consistency of the test, this is a baffling outcome.
The outcomes demon
strate that more work is required, and at times new or amended procedures are expected to improve quality. Great reviews are directed on issues like the use of important experience and information, powerful interior observing and audit, and whether there is a solid responsibility component. that is the reason public bookkeepers urge all reviewers to work as per this standard.This results show that review firms need to proceed with their endeavours to improve review quality and consistency of review results. As organizations keep on giving a valiant effort to improve this territory, they ought to consider improving existing projects and spotlight on new and manageable projects to improve review quality and keep a culture of zeroing in on this.
The chiefs are primarily liable for reviewing. Monetary Reporting Quality Reporting inspecting quality keeps up the nature of budget summaries, and it is to the greatest advantage of helping the chiefs and review board of trustees to help the review process.Ensure that administration delivers top notch monetary data, utilize adequate assets, abilities and involvement with the revealing cycle, and guarantee that adequate assets are utilized for examining. this report firmly prescribe not to choose analysts based on cost and not to guarantee the nature of the survey. Audit Quality the review doesn't endeavour to quantify where the inspectors play out their obligations and bring up criticisms regarding the association's draft budget summaries, which brings about huge changes to these assertions. We know very well. When playing out their obligations, the evaluator will roll out significant improvements to the arrangement of the yearly fiscal reports.
Table of Contents
    Sl. No.
    Topics
    Page No.
    1.
    Key Business Risk Identification
    3-4
    2.
    Analytical Review
    5-7
    3.
    Material Account Balance Identification
    8
    4.
    Assertions identified
    9
    5.
    Audit Program
    10
    6.
    Sampling Plan
    11
    7.
    Reference
    12
Key Business Risk Identified
The different dangers related with ANZ Bank's business can be generally partitioned into the accompanying classes:
Credit Risk
ANZ Bank's credit hazard objective is to accomplish economical development of productive credit, and can be additionally communicated as:
Strong danger control and revealing to be expected. For driving;
Strong hazards the executives’ abilities to empower ANZ's business to accomplish its objectives.
To accomplish this objective, there is a credit hazard the executives framework that gives an organized and restrained credit hazard the board cycle. The hazard of monetary misfortune because of rebelliousness or full consistence with ANZ clients' credit or agreement terms. This is consistently a danger component related with credit portfolios, and workers should be satisfactorily prepared to recognize, assess and oversee advances.
The principle expansion of this is that the return should be sensible to counterbalance the danger. Vision, worth and credibilityPrinciples and Guidelines The adequacy of the credit hazard the executives framework is affirmed through the consistence and checking measure, which along with portfolio the board characterizes and controls the credit cycle, association and staff.
Market Risk
Market hazard ANZ has a definite market hazard the executives and control framework to help exchanges. Joining free danger estimation techniques to evaluate the action of the market hazard degree in the exchanging portfolio.Use fitting examination to decide the scope of potential outcomes that can be anticipated throughout some stretch of time and the overall probability of these outcomes. Market hazard likewise incorporates the danger that ANZ Bank will expand revenue expenses because of monetary requirements when economic situations are poor.
Liquidity (asset report or non-tradable market hazard) ANZ Bank has an autonomous danger the executives and control framework dependent on the approach and breaking point structure supported by the directorate. As a feature of the general system and rules, bunch level market hazard control is the joint obligation of business divisions and hazard management.Within ANZ Bank, all market hazard positions are mutually overseen by three zones: Institutional market; Management organization's resource portfolio; Group depository.
Operational danger
Operational danger the board is a significant piece of ANZ Bank's by and large corporate administration and hazard the executives system. It is imperative to plainly comprehend the idea of this risk.ANZ Bank's meaning of operational danger is as per the following: "Dangers from every day business exercises may bring about immediate or backhanded misfortunes. These misfortunes might be because of inability to agree with arrangements, strategies, laws and guidelines, extortion or fraud, infringement of administrations, frameworks and The accessibility or culmination of the data may harm ANZ Bank's standing.
"Protection can be accommodated sure operational dangers, and protection can be acquired if benefits are made. No protection is accommodated numerous operational dangers. ANZ Bank accepts that the objective of operational danger the executives is to give organized danger ID, evaluation, estimation, the board and monitoring.ANZ Bank doesn't expect to reject all dangers, yet will attempt to limit chances dependent on a thorough danger/return examination of global monetary establishments.
Controversial and Other Risk
ANZ Bank's strategy is to direct business as per the laws, applicable guidelines and implicit rules of the country/area where it works,...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here