Assessment 2, Thank you.
Page | 1 Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College 55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111 PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D Approved: 14/02/2019,Version 1 Unit Code and Title: SBM1101 Project Management Fundamentals Assessment Overview Assessment Task Weighting Due Length ULO Assessment 1: Article Summary (Individual) Individual Assignment wherein the student summarizes a recently published journal article in the field of the subject and covers the concepts suggested by the lecturer requiring the article’s main topic(s), aim/ purpose, key points and conclusions are identified and summarised clearly 10% Week 4 400 - 500 words ULO-1 ULO-4 CLO-1 Assessment 2A: Reflective Journal (Individual) In this assignment (Reflective Learning Journal) you are required to think deeply and write about your learning experience and the topic (s) content you have learned over Week 6 and Week 7. 10% Week 7 400 - 500 words ULO-4 ULO-5 CLO-1 CLO-2 CLO-3 CLO-7 Assessment 2B: Reflective Journal (Individual) In this assignment (Reflective Learning Journal) you are required to think deeply and write about your learning experience and the topic (s) content you have learned over Week 8 and Week 9. 10% Week 9 400 - 500 words ULO-4 ULO-5 CLO-1 CLO-2 CLO-3 CLO-7 Assessment 3: Case Study and Literature Review (Individual) Students are required to work individually to provide a literature review and evaluate a case study. 30% Week 10 2000 words ULO-1 ULO-2 ULO-3 ULO-4 ULO-5 CLO-3 CLO-7 CLO-8 Assessment 4: Applied Project and Presentation (Group) Students are required to work to investigate, analyze, report and present on the initiation and planning of a case project prepare a report and power- point (PP) presentation file. 40% Week 12 2000 words and PP file ULO-1 ULO-2 ULO-3 ULO-4 ULO-5 CLO-1 CLO-2 CLO-3 CLO-7 CLO-8 Assessment Details Page | 2 Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College 55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111 PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D Approved: 14/02/2019,Version 1 Assessment 1: Article Summary Due date: Week 4 Group/individual: Individual Word count / Time provided: 400 -500 words (excludes link and reference) Weighting: 10% Unit Learning Outcomes: ULO-1, ULO-4 Assessment Details: The students are expected to select a published journal article (not older than 5 years) from the field of project management related to Adoption of Agile methodology in Industry (Engineering, Construction or any domain of your choice) and summarize the article’s main topic(s), aim/ purpose, key points and conclusions clearly in 400 (min.) to 500 words (max.). Students must provide the article’s website link and correctly provide the article’s reference in the submitted word file. The link and reference are not included in the word count. Marking Criteria and Rubric: The assessment will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 10% of the total unit mark Marking Criteria Not satisfactory (0-49%) of the criterion mark) Satisfactory (50-64%) of the criterion mark Good (65-74%) of the criterion mark Very Good (75-84%) of the criterion mark Excellent (85-100%) of the criterion mark Article choice (10 Marks) The article selected does not reflect the subject’s main concepts. The article selected is in the field of the subject and reflects one/some of the main concepts suggested by the lecturer. The article selected is in the field of the subject, covers the main concepts suggested by the lecturer but may not be current or scholarly. The article selected is in the field of the subject and covers the concepts suggested by the lecturer and is scholarly and relatively current. The article is from academic Journal and directly discusses the main concepts suggested by the lecturer and is highly relevant, scholarly and recently published. Written communication skills (20 marks) Writing lacks clarity and coherence. Points have not been paraphrased well. There are many errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. Writing is generally clear with some lapses in coherence. Some points have been paraphrased well. There are some errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. Writing is clear and coherent. Most points have been paraphrased well. There are some errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. Writing shows good clarity and cohesion. Points have been paraphrased well. There are few errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. Writing shows excellent clarity and cohesion. Points have been skilfully paraphrased. There are no or very few errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. Content (40 marks) The article’s main topic(s), aim/ purpose, key points and conclusions are missing, unclear, The article’s main topic(s), aim/ purpose, key points and conclusions are generally evident, but may be vague, The article’s main topic(s), aim/ purpose, key points and conclusions are identified and summarised The article’s main topic(s), aim/ purpose, key points and conclusions are identified and summarised clearly The article’s main topic(s), aim/ purpose, key points and conclusions are identified and summarised clearly, Page | 3 Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College 55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111 PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D Approved: 14/02/2019,Version 1 Marking Criteria Not satisfactory (0-49%) of the criterion mark) Satisfactory (50-64%) of the criterion mark Good (65-74%) of the criterion mark Very Good (75-84%) of the criterion mark Excellent (85-100%) of the criterion mark inaccurate and/or irrelevant. incomplete, or have some inaccuracies. accurately in most parts. Some information may be irrelevant or inaccurate. and accurately, providing a good overview of the article with minimal irrelevant or inaccurate information. accurately and precisely, providing an excellent overview of the original article. Structure (20 marks) The summary is not well organised, does not flow logically and is difficult to follow. The summary shows some organisation, but some parts may not flow logically and are difficult to follow. The summary shows organisation and is easy to follow, but occasionally still lacks flow. The summary shows coherent and logical organisation and most points are easy to follow. The summary shows coherent and logical organisation and has clear, well- structured points. Style and article link (10 mark) The article is not referenced and link is not provided. Reporting verbs and connecting words are not used. The article is referenced but link is not provided. Reference contains errors or does not follow Harvard referencing style. Limited reporting verbs and connecting words are used. The article is referenced in Harvard referencing style but may contain some minor errors. Article link is provided. Some reporting verbs and connecting words are used. The article is referenced in Harvard referencing style with few errors. Link is provided. Reporting verbs and connecting words are used well to create flow. The article is accurately referenced in Harvard referencing style. Link is provided. Reporting verbs and connecting words are used very well to create flow and cohesion. Assessment 2: Reflective Learning Journal (A and B) Due date: Week 7 and Week 9 Group/individual: Individual Word count / Time provided: 400-500 words Weighting: 10% each reflective journal (total 20%) Unit Learning Outcomes: ULO-1, ULO-2 In this assignment (Reflective Learning Journal) you are required to think deeply and write about your learning experience and the topic (s) content you have learned over the past weeks. You are required to write two reflective journal entries one about your learning experience and the topic (s) you learned in (Week 6 and Week 7) that is Reflective Journal (A) and it is due on Sunday of Week 7, and one about your learning experience and the topic (s) you learned in (Week 8 and Week 9) that is Reflective Journal (B) and it is due on Sunday of Week 9. It is recommended to visit the SLS page for more information about this type of assessment via this link https://apic.instructure.com/courses/39/pages/reflective-learning-journal https://apic.instructure.com/courses/39/pages/reflective-learning-journal Page | 4 Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College 55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111 PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D Approved: 14/02/2019,Version 1 In writing you reflective learning journal, you will need to follow the following strategy to write your journal entry: DIEP (Describe, Interpret, Evaluate, Plan) Strategy. Source: (RMIT University–adapted from Boud, D 1985, Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning) https://emedia.rmit.edu.au/learninglab/content/writing-academic-reflection-0 See attached file for explanation of each criterion in DIEP Mainly you need to select one of the main topics discussed in week 6 and week 7 and write your reflection on the selected topic. You required to write 400-500 words to describe your learning experience. You can use the following questions to guide your writing entry: • What did I read for this topic, apart from the notes? (Include information and references from a range of sources) • What was the most interesting thing I read for